House v. NCAA: what the sources say
Judge Claudia Wilken wrote “satisfies the fair, reasonable, and adequate standard.” WilmerHale wrote “Some critics argue that the salary pool constitutes illegal wage fixing.”
Published May 23, 2024 to Jun 13, 2025.
The record
- Settlement terms announced
- May 23, 2024NCAA.org, May 23, 2024
- Final approval
- June 6, 2025U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025
- Docket
- In re College Athlete NIL Litigation, No. 4:20-cv-03919-CW, N.D. Cal., Dkt. 978U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025
What was said
The court
Judge Claudia Wilken, U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California
First, the objectors have cited no authority that Title IX applies to damages awards distributions or that damages distributions made by a claims administrator are subject to Title IX.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025
Opinion, via CourtListener (storage.courtlistener.com); taken from the court docket and matched against the PDF text with the pleading margin line numbers (1-28) removed
Judge Claudia Wilken, U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California
The Court finds that the SA, as modified, satisfies the fair, reasonable, and adequate standard with respect to all class members, including those who were or may be impacted by its roster limits provisions.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025
Opinion, via CourtListener (storage.courtlistener.com); taken from the court docket and matched against the PDF text with the pleading margin line numbers (1-28) removed
Judge Claudia Wilken, U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California
We are not adjudicating if it is an antitrust violation ... We are adjudicating whether it is a proper balance of risks and rewards
Judge Claudia Wilken, U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California
Some objectors argue that the Pool cap is unfair to class members because, in their view, there is no valid reason for imposing any kind of cap on student-athlete compensation and benefits. The Court overrules these objections. The Pool spending cap does not alter the Court’s finding, above, that the SA is fair, reasonable, and adequate to all class members.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025
Opinion, via CourtListener (storage.courtlistener.com); taken from the court docket and matched against the PDF text with the pleading margin line numbers (1-28) removed
Supporters
Steve Berman, Co-lead counsel for the class, Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman’s sports litigation attorneys have fought the NCAA’s limits to scholarships and pay since 2004 and this result — 20 years later — is a fantastic win for hundreds of thousands of college athletes
NCAA and the five autonomy conferences (joint statement)
This settlement is also a road map for college sports leaders and Congress to ensure this uniquely American institution can continue to provide unmatched opportunity for millions of students.
Charlie Baker, NCAA president
Approving the agreement reached by the NCAA, the defendant conferences and student-athletes in the settlement opens a pathway to begin stabilizing college sports.
NCAA and the five autonomy conferences (joint statement)
The five autonomy conferences and the NCAA agreeing to settlement terms is an important step in the continuing reform of college sports that will provide benefits to student-athletes and provide clarity in college athletics across all divisions for years to come.
Critics
Some critics argue that the salary pool constitutes illegal wage fixing and a violation of the Sherman Act because the $20.5 million limit restricts high-revenue-generating athletes from earning more than they could earn in the free market.
On June 11, 2025, eight female athletes filed an appeal arguing that the distribution of approximately $2.8 billion violates Title IX because female athletes will receive less money than men’s basketball and football players.
Others, including the Department of Justice under former President Biden, expressed concern that the settlement itself would create even more antitrust violations with some of its new restrictions, like the cap on revenue-sharing.
Sources
- NCAA.org, May 23, 2024 Archived copy
“Joint statement on the agreement of settlement terms”
Statement, via the NCAA; the joint statement of NCAA President Charlie Baker and the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC commissioners
- NCAA.org, Jun 6, 2025 Archived copy
“A Letter from NCAA President Charlie Baker”
- Hagens Berman, Jun 6, 2025 Archived copy
“Court Grants Final Approval to Historic Settlement in NCAA College Athlete Name, Image and Likeness Antitrust Litigation”
Release published by Hagens Berman; the law firm representing the class
- U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025 Archived copy
“In re College Athlete NIL Litigation, No. 4:20-cv-03919-CW (N.D. Cal.), Opinion Regarding Order Granting Motion for Final Approval of Settlement Agreement, Dkt. 978”
- Sportico, Apr 7, 2025 Archived copy
“House v. NCAA Settlement Approval in Sight, but Judge Wants Tweaks”
Remarks, as quoted by Sportico; made at the April 7, 2025 final approval hearing
- Front Office Sports, May 15, 2025 Archived copy
“Everything You Need to Know About the House v. NCAA Settlement”
- WilmerHale, Jun 13, 2025 Archived copy
“Final Approval for House v. NCAA Settlement Brings New Era, More Litigation”
