House v. NCAA: what the sources say

Judge Claudia Wilken wrote “satisfies the fair, reasonable, and adequate standard.” WilmerHale wrote “Some critics argue that the salary pool constitutes illegal wage fixing.”

Published May 23, 2024 to Jun 13, 2025.

The record

Settlement terms announced
May 23, 2024NCAA.org, May 23, 2024
Final approval
June 6, 2025U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025
Docket
In re College Athlete NIL Litigation, No. 4:20-cv-03919-CW, N.D. Cal., Dkt. 978U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025

What was said

The court

Judge Claudia Wilken, U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California

First, the objectors have cited no authority that Title IX applies to damages awards distributions or that damages distributions made by a claims administrator are subject to Title IX.

U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025

Opinion, via CourtListener (storage.courtlistener.com); taken from the court docket and matched against the PDF text with the pleading margin line numbers (1-28) removed

Judge Claudia Wilken, U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California

The Court finds that the SA, as modified, satisfies the fair, reasonable, and adequate standard with respect to all class members, including those who were or may be impacted by its roster limits provisions.

U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025

Opinion, via CourtListener (storage.courtlistener.com); taken from the court docket and matched against the PDF text with the pleading margin line numbers (1-28) removed

Judge Claudia Wilken, U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California

We are not adjudicating if it is an antitrust violation ... We are adjudicating whether it is a proper balance of risks and rewards

Sportico, Apr 7, 2025

Judge Claudia Wilken, U.S. District Judge, Northern District of California

Some objectors argue that the Pool cap is unfair to class members because, in their view, there is no valid reason for imposing any kind of cap on student-athlete compensation and benefits. The Court overrules these objections. The Pool spending cap does not alter the Court’s finding, above, that the SA is fair, reasonable, and adequate to all class members.

U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Jun 6, 2025

Opinion, via CourtListener (storage.courtlistener.com); taken from the court docket and matched against the PDF text with the pleading margin line numbers (1-28) removed

Supporters

Steve Berman, Co-lead counsel for the class, Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman’s sports litigation attorneys have fought the NCAA’s limits to scholarships and pay since 2004 and this result — 20 years later — is a fantastic win for hundreds of thousands of college athletes

Hagens Berman, Jun 6, 2025

NCAA and the five autonomy conferences (joint statement)

This settlement is also a road map for college sports leaders and Congress to ensure this uniquely American institution can continue to provide unmatched opportunity for millions of students.

NCAA.org, May 23, 2024

Charlie Baker, NCAA president

Approving the agreement reached by the NCAA, the defendant conferences and student-athletes in the settlement opens a pathway to begin stabilizing college sports.

NCAA.org, Jun 6, 2025

NCAA and the five autonomy conferences (joint statement)

The five autonomy conferences and the NCAA agreeing to settlement terms is an important step in the continuing reform of college sports that will provide benefits to student-athletes and provide clarity in college athletics across all divisions for years to come.

NCAA.org, May 23, 2024

Critics

Some critics argue that the salary pool constitutes illegal wage fixing and a violation of the Sherman Act because the $20.5 million limit restricts high-revenue-generating athletes from earning more than they could earn in the free market.

WilmerHale, Jun 13, 2025

On June 11, 2025, eight female athletes filed an appeal arguing that the distribution of approximately $2.8 billion violates Title IX because female athletes will receive less money than men’s basketball and football players.

WilmerHale, Jun 13, 2025

Others, including the Department of Justice under former President Biden, expressed concern that the settlement itself would create even more antitrust violations with some of its new restrictions, like the cap on revenue-sharing.

Front Office Sports, May 15, 2025

Sources