Tavita Pritchard

3-4This season at Stanford
3-4Career
Program lift
Year 1
graded once a job reaches 3 seasons
See Stanford’s full coaching history →

Career arc

Part one · This week

As of Fri Oct 23

Friday: vs. NC State

Fri Oct 23, 10:30 pm ET ESPN · NC State is 3-3 · First meeting between Pritchard and Dave Doeren as head coaches · Stanford’s chance to win: 25% (the site’s model)

No headlines named him in the last 7 days

What they are talking about, week and season

Offense: 117th of 138 per play. Defense: 138th.

Offense, per play117thRunning offense130thDefense, per play138thDefense, points allowed per trip inside the 40138thWorstBest
Offense, per play117th of 138Running offense130th of 138Defense, per play138th of 138Defense, points allowed per trip inside the 40138th of 138WorstBest
Through 7 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Stanford. The other two rows are where Stanford stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.

5 games left

  1. Fri Oct 23vs. NC State (3-3)ESPN25%
  2. Sat Oct 31at Louisville (4-3)ACC Network6%
  3. Sat Nov 14at Virginia Tech (5-2)15%
  4. Sat Nov 21at California (3-4)41%
  5. Sat Nov 28vs. SMU (5-1)13%

Percent: Stanford’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.

How the season got here

Where Stanford stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).

63rd69th75thPreseason67thHawai'i W 37-27Hawai'i W 37-27W 37-27Hawai'i67thMiami L 6-45Miami L 6-45L 6-45Miami67thDuke L 7-35Duke L 7-35L 7-35Duke67thGeorgia Tech W 34-27Georgia Tech W 34-27W 34-27Georgia Tech68thWake Forest L 3-57Wake Forest L 3-57L 3-57Wake Forest70thNotre Dame L 7-58Notre Dame L 7-58L 7-58Notre Dame70thElon W 34-7Elon W 34-7W 34-7Elon71st
  1. Oct 12–18W 34-7 vs. Elon0 headlines
  2. Oct 5–11L 7-58 at Notre Dame2 headlines · 70th of 138
  3. Sep 28–Oct 4L 3-57 at Wake Forest0 headlines
  4. Sep 21–27 · rebuiltW 34-27 vs. Georgia Tech0 headlines
  5. Sep 14–20 · rebuiltL 7-35 at Duke2 headlines · 79th of 138Everything Stanford HC Tavita Pritchard said following Duke's win Duke Wire
  6. Sep 7–13 · rebuiltNo game2 headlines · 84th of 138Stanford Broadcaster SCOTT REISS Previews Miami-Stanford & Goes Behind-the-Scenes on Andrew Luck and Tavita Pritchard The Miami Hurricane

Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.

Watch the biggest plays from Stanford’s games, ranked by how much each moved the chance to win.

Stanford

5 stories about him in the last 30 days

Fri Oct 23: NC State

from 3 outlets and r/CFB

Sep 27: 1Oct 5: 1Oct 6: 2Oct 11: 1W 34-27 vs Georgia TechWL 3-57 at Wake ForestLL 7-58 at Notre DameLW 34-7 vs ElonWSep 24Oct 23Most in a day: 2
Sep 27: 1Oct 5: 1Oct 6: 2Oct 11: 1W 34-27 vs Georgia TechWL 3-57 at Wake ForestLL 7-58 at Notre DameLW 34-7 vs ElonWSep 24Oct 23Most in a day: 2
Gold: stories about him each day. W and L: his games.

What they’re talking about

Press conference and quotes2 stories

37 stories about him this season

from 21 outlets and r/CFB

Aug 1 to Aug 7: 4Aug 8 to Aug 14: 2Aug 15 to Aug 21: 6Aug 22 to Aug 28: 6Aug 29 to Sep 4: 9Sep 5 to Sep 11: 3Sep 12 to Sep 18: 1Sep 19 to Sep 25: 1Sep 26 to Oct 2: 1Oct 3 to Oct 9: 3Oct 10 to Oct 16: 1W 37-27 vs Hawai'iWL 6-45 vs MiamiLL 7-35 at DukeLW 34-27 vs Georgia TechWL 3-57 at Wake ForestLL 7-58 at Notre DameLW 34-7 vs ElonWAug 1Oct 23Most in a week: 9
Aug 1 to Aug 7: 4Aug 8 to Aug 14: 2Aug 15 to Aug 21: 6Aug 22 to Aug 28: 6Aug 29 to Sep 4: 9Sep 5 to Sep 11: 3Sep 12 to Sep 18: 1Sep 19 to Sep 25: 1Sep 26 to Oct 2: 1Oct 3 to Oct 9: 3Oct 10 to Oct 16: 1W 37-27 vs Hawai'iWL 6-45 vs MiamiLL 7-35 at DukeLW 34-27 vs Georgia TechWL 3-57 at Wake ForestLL 7-58 at Notre DameLW 34-7 vs ElonWAug 1Oct 23Most in a week: 9
Gold: stories about him each week. W and L: his games. Counted from Aug 1, when tracking began.

What they’re talking about

Press conference and quotes9 stories
Game preview7 stories
Win5 stories
Quarterback and depth chart3 stories

Could another school hire him? What has he said?

Stories are headlines grouped by what they are about, counted through Oct 23.

In his own words

We have to find a way to stop helping the other team … whether it was penalties, or mental errors, missed assignments
Stanforddaily · · 2 days after Stanford's 2026 game against Notre Dame
Every quote, back to September 2026

In his own words (4)

When some of those plays do start to go our way, he’s ready for those moments; he’s not pressing
Stanforddaily2 days after the 34-7 game
We have to find a way to stop helping the other team … whether it was penalties, or mental errors, missed assignments
Stanforddaily2 days after Stanford's 2026 game against Notre Dame
I thought our guys just did a better job of executing the fundamentals of what we were doing
Stanforddailythe day after the 34-27 game
We know that we’re going to have to move on pretty quickly from this
Stanforddaily3 days before the opener
Part two · The hire

Hires into jobs like this

Hired into 29–29, National Program III. Rough match, not calibrated yet — ranked on what the job inherited alone. Coaches hired into this same job aren’t used as comps.

Of the 5 closest comps, 4 left the program higher than he found it and 1 left it lower. Median stay: 4 seasons.
Every coach hired into a National Program III job since 1990 (65): typically -1.7 after year 1, -3.2 after year 2.
band ends: fewer than 15 hires still in the job+4what he inherited-4hiredyr 1yr 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr 6Coughlin: +5.2 vs. inheritedHoeppner: +5.4 vs. inheritedDiaz: +3 vs. inheritedHafley: -4.7 vs. inheritedFrost: +3.5 vs. inheritedPritchard: -2.2 vs. inherited▏ Hoeppner +5.4▏ Coughlin +5.2▏ Frost +3.5▏ Diaz +3Pritchard -2.2▏ Hafley -4.7
→ Boston College, 1991
4–7 · 8–3 · 9–3
3 seasons
+5.2 vs. what he inherited
→ Miami (OH), 1999
7–4 · 6–5 · 7–5 · 7–5 · 13–1 · 8–5
6 seasons
+5.4 vs. what he inherited
→ Duke, 2024
9–4 · 9–5 · 4–2
3 seasons
+3.0 vs. what he inherited
→ Boston College, 2020
6–5 · 6–6 · 3–9 · 7–6
4 seasons
-4.7 vs. what he inherited
→ UCF, 2016
6–7 · 13–0 · 5–7 · 3–3
4 seasons
+3.5 vs. what he inherited
First head-coaching job
No prior college head-coaching tenure on record.
The job he took
Followed Frank Reich (2025–2025), after the season
4–8
Program was sliding in the 2023–2025 run-up.
A National Program III job.
Rivalry record so far
Legends Trophy vs. Notre Dame0–1
How new coaches start here
  • Frank Reich20254–8-1.5
  • Troy Taylor20233–9-5.9
  • David Shaw201111–2+6.4
  • Jim Harbaugh20074–8-1.7
  • Walt Harris20055–6-0.3
  • Buddy Teevens20022–9-2.8
  • Tyrone Willingham19957–4-0.5
  • Dennis Green19893–8-1.2

This season

3%chance he’s out by the end of this seasonCool77th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs
0%50%+

Our hot-seat model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, and his contract (a bigger buyout, relative to pay, makes a change costlier). Ranked against the 137 FBS head coaches with 3+ games this season.

His first rated season here.

His hot seat, week by week

The chance he’s out by the end of that season, as it stood after every week of his tenure here, by today’s model.

BoilingHotWarmCool20262026, week 3 (3 games in): 4%, 68th-hottest of 133 FBS jobs2026, week 4 (4 games in): 3%, 75th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 5 (5 games in): 4%, 70th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 6 (6 games in): 3%, 78th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 7 (7 games in): 3%, 79th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 8 (7 games in): 3%, 77th-hottest of 137 FBS jobsnow

What drives his number

The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS job today.

  • ▼ Cooler
    Year 1 · tenure, which this model overrates
    (why?)

    Tenure is one of this model’s strongest inputs, but its weight was set when retirements like Nick Saban’s and Bob Stoops’ still counted as being pushed out, so it overstates how much tenure matters.

  • ▲ Hotter
    3-4, outscored by 128
  • ▼ Cooler
    No previous seasons here to judge him on

What happened to coaches like him, 2004–2025

A different comparison: past coaches, not today’s, grouped by one fact at a time. Neither line knows the games he has left or his contract, so they can sit above or below his chance.

Were 3-4 after 7 games
13% pushed out over results · of 522 coaches
Were in year 1, after 7 games
1% pushed out over results · of 523 coaches
The outcome
Pushed out over results — a firing, forced resignation, mutual parting or non-renewal, each read case by case. Leaving for a better job, or retiring on his own terms, doesn’t count.
Buyout
No figure on file for this coach. The salary database predates the last coaching carousel; a name mismatch is suppressed rather than misattributed.

How good is this number? Checked on every FBS coach from 2010 to 2025, with its percentages calibrated each season on earlier years only: they track what happened — coaches it put near 25% were out about a quarter of the time — and a version pricing the games left with the previous season’s ratings ranked jobs as well as the ranking this page used before. Each week it learns from coaches who were still on the job at that point, so a firing during the season counts. In the Boiling zone it has run a few points high. Every job, and the method.

Part three · The career

Coaching career

2026–now
Stanford
too new to grade yet

Followed Frank Reich (2025).

Who they bring in

Brings in smaller-than-position-typical players than most.

Recruits younger transfers than most — more of a development bet.

Avg. size (raw)
6′2″, 192 lbs
across 3 of 6 arrivals — unadjusted for position mix
Size vs. position-typical
-4.6 lbs
#254 of 255 · bottom quarter
Avg. class year
Fr
#255 of 255 · bottom quarter
Avg. portal rating
3.0★
rated arrivals only
Top states: CA (3)
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
29.5
position-weighted
Talent lost
42.8
position-weighted
Net
-13.4
arrivals minus departures
Best addition: Davis Warren (QB) from Michigan
Biggest loss: Elijah Brown (QB) to Washington
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.
Where the roster comes from, by position
Grows Edge from high school
100%
#191 of 208 stints
Grows Safety from high school
100%
#201 of 218 stints

AI Narratives — “Stanford — stat check”.

3-4

Big games

The big-game ledger

How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.

0-1 against his rivals.

Rivalry record
0-1
0.0% · 1 rival
One-score games
1-0
100.0% · margin ≤8
Against the spread
2-5
all 7 had a line
Rivalry ledger
Performance by opponent class
Power Program
0-2 0.0%
National Program
1-2 33.3%
Regional Program
1-0 100.0%

ATS is his record against the spread: did his team beat the closing betting line, winning by more than it or losing by less? Lines start in 2013; a dash means fewer than 6 of those games had one. One-score games carry no spread record: a big favorite that wins a close game has almost always failed to cover, so that number would say nothing about the coach.

Signature games

0-2 vs. AP top 25 · 0-2 vs. the top 10
Signature wins
W
Georgia Tech · 2026
34-27
UpsetQuality opponent
W
Hawai'i · 2026
37-27
Quality opponent
Signature losses
L
Notre Dame · 2026
7-58
Rival
L
Miami · 2026
6-45
L
Duke · 2026
7-35

Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.

Style position and drift

Where each stint’s offense sat between run-first and pass-first, and how far it moved from one season to the next, against the FBS-wide average of 41% pass. The band is that stint’s real season-to-season range, not a fixed-width box.

40%50%FBS avg 41%Stanford2026–20261 season
Pass rate — share of offensive plays that were pass attemptsfirst covered seasonmost recent covered season

How good is he so far?

Too new to grade — in-season movement only
Stanford’s composite stature has fallen since preseason: 28.4 entering the year to 26.6 through week 8 (National Program III) · #21 of 138 in movement since preseason · top quarter.
Part four · How he builds a team

Three numbers on how he actually stocks a roster, from signing day to draft day.

  1. 1His recruiting
  2. 2Roster ownership
  3. 3Where he recruits

His recruiting, really

No class below is fully his yet — every one was inherited or signed mid-transition, so none counts toward a verdict.

2026
#37
Transition

Transition — he was hired mid-cycle

Rank is each signing class’s national recruiting rank (#1 is best). Only a class he had a full signing cycle to build counts as his; inherited and mid-transition classes still show here, faded, but stay out of the average.

Roster ownership

Roster ownership

29%His own players

of his 2026 roster arrived on his watch — 33 of 113 players. The other 80 are holdovers from before he was hired.

Arrived under him 33Inherited 80

Of his own players on this roster, 9% came through the transfer portal; the rest are non-portal arrivals (high-school signees, JUCO transfers, walk-ons).

Everyone he has brought in, 2026–2026Counting players who have since left: 9% of the 33 arrivals we can classify came through the portal.

“His own” means the player arrived while he was head coach; “inherited” means a predecessor brought him in.

Where he recruits

CATop state

is his biggest recruiting state: 6 of 23 signees (26%) across his 2026–2026 tenure, drawn from 11 states in all. Next: AZ (3).

Where his signees came from, 2026–2026 (23 high-school, JUCO and prep signees)

43% of his signees come from CA and its 3 border states (AZ 3, NV 1).

1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee2 signees1 signee1 signee
By region
West
11
South
9
Northeast
3
Roster distance from campus (Stanford Stadium, CA)
median hometown distance
1,624 mi
within 100 mi
11%
within 500 mi
28%
beyond 1,000 mi
61%
106 of 113 roster players with a known hometown (94% coverage)

The map counts signed recruits across his tenure; the distance figures cover his current roster, transfers and walk-ons included. Two different groups, kept separate on purpose.