Tre Lamb

4-3This season at Tulsa
8-11FBS career

Also coached below FBS: Gardner–Webb 2020–23; East Tennessee State 2024

Program lift
Year 2
graded once a job reaches 3 seasons
See Tulsa’s full coaching history →

Career arc

Part one · This week

As of Fri Oct 23

What the result changed

  • Playoff odds <0.1% → 0.1% CFB Zeitgeist forecast, before and after

Win and he’s at 3%. Lose and he’s at 6%.

vs. Army, Fri Oct 23, 8:30 pm ET ESPN2 · Army is 4-2 · Lamb vs. Jeff Monken: 1-0 · Tulsa’s chance to win: 34% (the site’s model)

CoolWarmHotBoilingIf Tulsa wins: 3%, 74th of 137Now: 5%If Tulsa loses: 6%, 60th of 1370%50%+
CoolWarmHotBoiling0%50%+
  • If Tulsa wins: 3%, 74th of 137
  • Now: 5%
  • If Tulsa loses: 6%, 60th of 137
His chance of being out after the season, now and after Saturday. Each tick is an FBS head coach’s number today; ranks are against today’s field. From the site’s hot-seat model.

Is he getting fired?

5% chance he’s out after the season · 62nd of 137 FBS head coaches · Cool

Coolunder 10%Warm10–20%Hot20–35%Boiling35% upNow9% had they lost9% had they lostLoss 6%Win 3%8%7%5%3%6%7%7%5%Pre1W vs. Oklahoma StateW2W at Sam HoustonW3W vs. East Texas A&MW4L at ArkansasL5L vs. North TexasL6L at NavyL7W at RiceW8Chance to win vs. Army34%9Chance to win at Tulane45%10Chance to win vs. Florida Atlantic68%11Chance to win vs. Charlotte89%12Chance to win at UTSA24%Game number. Under each game: the result, or his team’s chance to win it
CoolWarmHotBoilingNow9% had they lost9% had they lostLoss 6%Win 3%8%5%Pre367912Game
Dark line: his number after each game; a small dot just before a game is where it stood at kickoff, after other results moved it. Gray: where it could go, 8 seasons in 10 (darker, the middle half). The hollow dot: had his last game gone the other way. From the site’s hot-seat model.

If he finishes…

Bar: how likely that finish isNumber: his chance of being out

  1. 5-78%
  2. 6-65%
  3. 7-53%
  4. 8-42%
  5. 9-31%
Why his number is where it is

Our hot-seat model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, and his contract (a bigger buyout, relative to pay, makes a change costlier). Ranked against the 137 FBS head coaches with 3+ games this season.

Now right where 2025 was at this point.

His hot seat, week by week

The chance he’s out by the end of that season, as it stood after every week of his tenure here, by today’s model.

BoilingHotWarmCool202520262025, week 3 (3 games in): 3%, 70th-hottest of 118 FBS jobs2025, week 4 (4 games in): 2%, 84th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 5 (5 games in): 2%, 80th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 6 (6 games in): 3%, 75th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 7 (6 games in): 3%, 75th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 8 (7 games in): 3%, 75th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 9 (8 games in): 3%, 71st-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 10 (8 games in): 3%, 70th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 11 (9 games in): 3%, 70th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 12 (10 games in): 2%, 74th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 13 (11 games in): 2%, 78th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 14 (12 games in): 2%, 74th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 15 (12 games in): 2%, 74th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 16 (12 games in): 2%, 74th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2026, week 3 (3 games in): 3%, 73rd-hottest of 133 FBS jobs2026, week 4 (4 games in): 6%, 59th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 5 (5 games in): 7%, 55th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 6 (6 games in): 7%, 55th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 7 (7 games in): 5%, 63rd-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 8 (7 games in): 5%, 62nd-hottest of 137 FBS jobsnow

Earlier seasons price the games left with power ratings rebuilt after those seasons ended.

What drives his number

The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS job today.

  • ▲ Hotter
    4-8 over his previous season here
  • ▼ Cooler
    Year 2 · tenure, which this model overrates
    (why?)

    Tenure is one of this model’s strongest inputs, but its weight was set when retirements like Nick Saban’s and Bob Stoops’ still counted as being pushed out, so it overstates how much tenure matters.

What happened to coaches like him, 2004–2025

A different comparison: past coaches, not today’s, grouped by one fact at a time. Neither line knows the games he has left or his contract, so they can sit above or below his chance.

Were 4-3 after 7 games
6% pushed out over results · of 573 coaches
Were in year 2, after 7 games
5% pushed out over results · of 473 coaches
The outcome
Pushed out over results — a firing, forced resignation, mutual parting or non-renewal, each read case by case. Leaving for a better job, or retiring on his own terms, doesn’t count.
Buyout
No figure on file for this coach. The salary database predates the last coaching carousel; a name mismatch is suppressed rather than misattributed.

How good is this number? Checked on every FBS coach from 2010 to 2025, with its percentages calibrated each season on earlier years only: they track what happened — coaches it put near 25% were out about a quarter of the time — and a version pricing the games left with the previous season’s ratings ranked jobs as well as the ranking this page used before. Each week it learns from coaches who were still on the job at that point, so a firing during the season counts. In the Boiling zone it has run a few points high. Every job, and the method.

2 headlines named him in the last 7 days

73rd of 138 FBS head coaches

The headlines, Oct 18–23 from 2 outlets

What they are talking about, week and season

Offense: 69th of 138 per play. Defense: 59th.

Offense, per play69thRunning offense23rdDefense, per play59thPass defense128thWorstBest
Offense, per play69th of 138Running offense23rd of 138Defense, per play59th of 138Pass defense128th of 138WorstBest
Through 7 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Tulsa. The other two rows are where Tulsa stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.

5 games left

  1. Fri Oct 23vs. Army (4-2)ESPN234%
  2. Sat Nov 7at Tulane (3-3)45%
  3. Sat Nov 14vs. Florida Atlantic (4-2)68%
  4. Sat Nov 21vs. Charlotte (1-6)89%
  5. Sat Nov 28at UTSA (6-1)24%

Percent: Tulsa’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.

How the season got here

Where Tulsa stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).

98th104th110thPreseason104thOklahoma State W 24-10Oklahoma State W 24-10W 24-10Oklahoma State104thSam Houston W 23-17Sam Houston W 23-17W 23-17Sam Houston105thEast Texas A&M W 42-0East Texas A&M W 42-0W 42-0East Texas A&M104thArkansas L 6-34Arkansas L 6-34L 6-34Arkansas104thNorth Texas L 44-45North Texas L 44-45L 44-45North Texas105thNavy L 26-34Navy L 26-34L 26-34Navy103rdRice W 38-17Rice W 38-17W 38-17Rice103rd
  1. Oct 12–18W 38-17 at Rice2 headlines · 74th of 138
  2. Oct 5–11L 26-34 at Navy2 headlines · 70th of 138
  3. Sep 28–Oct 4L 44-45 vs. North Texas6 headlines · 59th of 138Tulsa football: Tre Lamb explains why his Golden Hurricane went for 2 Tulsa World
  4. Sep 21–27 · rebuiltL 6-34 at Arkansas5 headlines · 60th of 138
  5. Sep 14–20 · rebuiltW 42-0 vs. East Texas A&M1 headline · 91st of 138
  6. Sep 7–13 · rebuiltW 23-17 at Sam Houston3 headlines · 73rd of 138

Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.

Watch the biggest plays from Tulsa’s games, ranked by how much each moved the chance to win.

Tulsa

15 stories about him in the last 30 days

Fri Oct 23: Army

from 8 outlets and r/CFB

Sep 24: 1Sep 27: 2Sep 28: 2Sep 29: 1Sep 30: 1Oct 2: 2Oct 5: 2Oct 12: 2Oct 19: 2L 6-34 at ArkansasLL 44-45 vs North TexasLL 26-34 at NavyLW 38-17 at RiceWSep 24Oct 23Most in a day: 2
Sep 24: 1Sep 27: 2Sep 28: 2Sep 29: 1Sep 30: 1Oct 2: 2Oct 5: 2Oct 12: 2Oct 19: 2L 6-34 at ArkansasLL 44-45 vs North TexasLL 26-34 at NavyLW 38-17 at RiceWSep 24Oct 23Most in a day: 2
Gold: stories about him each day. W and L: his games.

What they’re talking about

Game preview6 stories
Press conference and quotes3 stories

48 stories about him this season

from 17 outlets and r/CFB

Aug 1 to Aug 7: 2Aug 8 to Aug 14: 2Aug 15 to Aug 21: 5Aug 22 to Aug 28: 2Aug 29 to Sep 4: 13Sep 5 to Sep 11: 4Sep 12 to Sep 18: 1Sep 19 to Sep 25: 5Sep 26 to Oct 2: 8Oct 3 to Oct 9: 2Oct 10 to Oct 16: 2Oct 17 to Oct 23: 2W 24-10 vs Oklahoma StateWW 23-17 at Sam HoustonWW 42-0 vs East Texas A&MWL 6-34 at ArkansasLL 44-45 vs North TexasLL 26-34 at NavyLW 38-17 at RiceWAug 1Oct 23Most in a week: 13
Aug 1 to Aug 7: 2Aug 8 to Aug 14: 2Aug 15 to Aug 21: 5Aug 22 to Aug 28: 2Aug 29 to Sep 4: 13Sep 5 to Sep 11: 4Sep 12 to Sep 18: 1Sep 19 to Sep 25: 5Sep 26 to Oct 2: 8Oct 3 to Oct 9: 2Oct 10 to Oct 16: 2Oct 17 to Oct 23: 2W 24-10 vs Oklahoma StateWW 23-17 at Sam HoustonWW 42-0 vs East Texas A&MWL 6-34 at ArkansasLL 44-45 vs North TexasLL 26-34 at NavyLW 38-17 at RiceWAug 1Oct 23Most in a week: 13
Gold: stories about him each week. W and L: his games. Counted from Aug 1, when tracking began.

What they’re talking about

Press conference and quotes16 stories
Game preview8 stories
Win3 stories
Hot seat2 stories
Injuries2 stories
Quarterback and depth chart2 stories

41 stories about him across 2 seasons

2025: 52026: 36Tulsa20252026Most in a year: 36
2025: 52026: 36Tulsa20252026Most in a year: 36
Gold: stories we tracked each season, drawn on a square-root scale so a quiet year still shows. Hatched: before we started tracking (2025). Earlier years had thinner coverage, so compare within a stop, not across decades.

Is he on the hot seat? Could another school hire him? What has he said?

Stories are headlines grouped by what they are about, counted through Oct 23.

In his own words

Awaiting signal — no quotes collected from this staff yet this cycle.

Part two · The hire

Hires into jobs like this

Hired into 15–15, Regional Program III. Rough match, not calibrated yet — ranked on what the job inherited alone. Coaches hired into this same job aren’t used as comps.

Of the 5 closest comps, 2 left the program higher than he found it and 2 left it lower. Median stay: 4 seasons; 1 left mid-season.
Every coach hired into a Regional Program III job since 1990 (87): typically -0.7 after year 1, +0.2 after year 2.
+12+8+4what he inherited-4hiredyr 1yr 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr 6yr 7Lynch: +0 vs. inheritedWilson: +5.5 vs. inheritedPorter: -5.7 vs. inheritedDennehy: -4.2 vs. inheritedMeyer: +5.1 vs. inheritedLamb: +0.2 vs. inherited✕ Wilson +5.5▏ Meyer +5.1Lamb +0.2▏ Lynch +0▏ Dennehy -4.2▏ Porter -5.7
→ Indiana, 2007
7–6 · 3–9 · 4–8 · 5–7
4 seasons
+0.0 vs. what he inherited
→ Indiana, 2011
1–11 · 4–8 · 5–7 · 4–8 · 6–7 · 6–6
6 seasons · left mid-season
+5.5 vs. what he inherited
3Larry Porter No page yet
→ Memphis, 2010
1–11 · 2–10
2 seasons
-5.7 vs. what he inherited
→ Utah State, 2000
5–6 · 4–7 · 4–7 · 3–9 · 3–8
5 seasons
-4.2 vs. what he inherited
→ Bowling Green, 2001
8–3 · 9–3
2 seasons · retired
+5.1 vs. what he inherited
Résumé
Previous stops: Gardner–Webb (2020–2023) · East Tennessee State (2024–2024)
No single prior tenure of 4+ seasons to profile.
The job he took
Followed Kevin Wilson (2023–2024), after the season
7–16
Program was sliding in the 2022–2024 run-up.
A Regional Program III job.
How new coaches start here
  • Kevin Wilson20234–8-4.1
  • Philip Montgomery20156–7+0.2
  • Bill Blankenship20118–5+1.8
  • Todd Graham200710–4+4.5
  • Steve Kragthorpe20038–5+0.7
  • Keith Burns20005–7-0.3
  • David Rader19884–7-1.7
  • George Henshaw19873–8-4.8

Poach watch

This winter

2%chance he leaves this winter for a head-coaching job elsewhere, or an NFL coordinator jobSettled71st-highest of 137 FBS head coaches
0%50%+

Our poach model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, his program, his pay and his background. Ranked against the 137 FBS head coaches this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.

What drives his number

The biggest factors in his profile, each against the typical FBS head coach today. The games he has left are priced into the number, not listed here.

  • ▼ Lower
    4-8 over his previous season here
  • ▲ Higher
    Age 37 · neither at his alma mater nor in the state he was born in
  • ▲ Higher
    His team is 4-3, outscoring opponents by 6.6 points a game
How good is this number? It ranks a head coach who leaves for another head-coaching job ahead of one who stays 78 to 82% of the time, and its average came within a point of the share who actually left. What it can’t do

Tested on every FBS head coach from 2012 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it. From three games on, given one coach who left for a head-coaching job elsewhere or an NFL coordinator job and one who stayed, it ranked the one who left ahead 79 to 82% of the time; in a season’s first two games, 78%. Its average chance came within a point of the share who actually left. It counts a move a coach makes while he still holds the job; when his school ends it, that doesn’t count, even if another school then hires him.

  • The live number prices the games he has left with the power model’s ratings from this season. The test priced them with each team’s rating from the season before, because ratings made during past seasons were not kept, so this live version could not be replayed.
  • Programs new to FBS have no FBS record before this season in the data it reads, so their coaches are scored without one.
  • It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.
  • A coach hired in December needs his background (age, alma mater, the state he was born in) added before his first game, or he shows as not rated.
Part three · The career

Coaching career

2025–now
Tulsa
too new to grade yet

Followed Kevin Wilson (2023–2024).

System Shift, on arrival
Season20252026Trend
Record & result
Record4-84-3
Postseason——
Coordinators
OCTy Darlington / Brad RobbinsKevin Barbay / Ty Darlington
DCJosh Reardon / Mike GrayJosh Reardon / Mike Gray
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense3068
Defense4956
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%41.646.7
Red-zone pass%38.442.3
4th-down go%opp. territory54.857.1
Recruiter or developer?

Underperforms his recruiting talent on offense and performs about as expected for his recruiting talent on defense.

Offense vs. talent
-16.4 pts
#167 of 208 · bottom quarter
Defense vs. talent
+2.1 pts
#90 of 208 · middle half
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Who they bring in

Brings in smaller-than-position-typical players than most.

Recruits younger transfers than most — more of a development bet.

Avg. size (raw)
6′1″, 234 lbs
across 43 of 52 arrivals — unadjusted for position mix
Size vs. position-typical
-2.3 lbs
#244 of 255 · bottom quarter
Avg. class year
So
#245 of 255 · bottom quarter
Avg. portal rating
3.0★
rated arrivals only
Top states: GA (8), LA (6), TX (6), FL (4), OK (4)
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
52.4
position-weighted
Talent lost
53.6
position-weighted
Net
-1.2
arrivals minus departures
Best addition: Dexter Williams II (QB) from Kennesaw State
Biggest loss: Tim Carpenter (QB) to Ohio
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.
Does the system survive a coordinator change?
OC: Ty Darlington (co) / Brad Robbins → Kevin Barbay / Ty Darlington (co) · 2026
30th pct68th pct0th100th
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
1st-down pass rate: 41.6% → 46.7% (+5.1 pts)
Confound, shown not hidden: only 41% of offensive production returned the year the coordinator changed — the roster turned over at the same time, not just the play-caller.
Where the roster comes from, by position
Buys Running back via the portal
78%
#18 of 208 stints
Buys Edge via the portal
75%
#23 of 208 stints

AI Narratives — “Tulsa — stat check” and 3 more on the team page.

8-11

Big games

The big-game ledger

How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.

One-score games
3-5
37.5% · margin ≤8
Against the spread
10-9
all 19 had a line
Performance by opponent class
National Program
2-5 28.6%
Regional Program
4-6 40.0%

ATS is his record against the spread: did his team beat the closing betting line, winning by more than it or losing by less? Lines start in 2013; a dash means fewer than 6 of those games had one. One-score games carry no spread record: a big favorite that wins a close game has almost always failed to cover, so that number would say nothing about the coach.

How he plays

Run/pass mix, by field position

Ran more than the situation called for under Robbins.

901 run and pass snaps at Tulsa, 2025–2025, his own games, one row per offensive coordinator. Each cell is how much more often he passed than the rest of FBS did in the same situation (field zone, down, distance, score, quarter, same season), in percentage points.

passed moreran morewithin noise (95% range includes 0)
Pass rate, stint by stint

Where each stint’s offense sat between run-first and pass-first, and how far it moved from one season to the next, against the FBS-wide average of 41% pass. The band is that stint’s real season-to-season range, not a fixed-width box.

40%50%FBS avg 41%Tulsa2025–2026▲ 2.1pt
Pass rate — share of offensive plays that were pass attemptsfirst covered seasonmost recent covered season

How good is he so far?

Too new to grade — in-season movement only
Tulsa’s composite stature has held about steady since preseason: 15.1 entering the year to 15.6 through week 8 (Regional Program III) · #97 of 138 in movement since preseason · middle half.
Part four · How he builds a team

Three numbers on how he actually stocks a roster, from signing day to draft day.

  1. 1His recruiting
  2. 2Roster ownership
  3. 3Where he recruits

His recruiting, really

#93Nationally, his own classes

His one ranked Tulsa class of his own finished #93 nationally.

2025
#109
Transition
2026
#93
His class

His class — he had the full signing cycleTransition — he was hired mid-cycle

Rank is each signing class’s national recruiting rank (#1 is best). Only a class he had a full signing cycle to build counts as his; inherited and mid-transition classes still show here, faded, but stay out of the average.

Roster ownership

Roster ownership

74%His own players

of his 2026 roster arrived on his watch — 82 of 111 players. The other 29 are holdovers from before he was hired.

Arrived under him 82Inherited 29

Of his own players on this roster, 28% came through the transfer portal; the rest are non-portal arrivals (high-school signees, JUCO transfers, walk-ons).

Everyone he has brought in, 2025–2026Counting players who have since left: 39% of the 111 arrivals we can classify came through the portal.

“His own” means the player arrived while he was head coach; “inherited” means a predecessor brought him in.

Where he recruits

TXTop state

is his biggest recruiting state: 17 of 38 signees (45%) across his 2025–2026 tenure, drawn from 10 states in all. Next: OK (8).

Where his signees came from, 2025–2026 (38 high-school, JUCO and prep signees)

76% of his signees come from TX and its 4 border states (OK 8, AR 3, LA 1).

1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee2 signees1 signee1 signee1 signee2 signees1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee
By region
South
34
Midwest
4
Roster distance from campus (Chapman Stadium, OK)
median hometown distance
247 mi
within 100 mi
30%
within 500 mi
70%
beyond 1,000 mi
4%
101 of 111 roster players with a known hometown (91% coverage)

The map counts signed recruits across his tenure; the distance figures cover his current roster, transfers and walk-ons included. Two different groups, kept separate on purpose.