Dana Holgorsen

Head coach, Houston, 2019 to 2024
Before: West Virginia

Now

Career arc

Stature score reached, by season of his head-coaching careerFBS medianWest VirginiaHoustonPittsburghPittsburghRiceRicePower Programperennial contenderNational Programrespectable, streakyRegional Programthe building-block levelWest Virginia when he took over: 51.4 (Power Program II), its final 2010 readingtook overWest Virginia, 2011: 10-3, Power Program IIWest Virginia, 2011: 10-3, Power Program II201110-3West Virginia, 2012: 7-6, Power Program II20127-6West Virginia, 2013: 4-8, Power Program III20134-8West Virginia, 2014: 7-6, Power Program III20147-6West Virginia, 2015: 8-5, Power Program III20158-5West Virginia, 2016: 10-3, Power Program III201610-3West Virginia, 2017: 7-6, Power Program III20177-6West Virginia, 2018: 8-4, Power Program IIIWest Virginia, 2018: 8-4, Power Program III20188-4-4.6Houston when he took over: 37.5 (National Program I), its final 2018 readingtook overHouston, 2019: 4-8, National Program IIHouston, 2019: 4-8, National Program II20194-8Houston, 2020: 3-5, National Program II20203-5Houston, 2021: 12-2, National Program I202112-2Houston, 2022: 8-5, National Program I20228-5Houston, 2023: 4-8, National Program IHouston, 2023: 4-8, National Program I20234-8+1.6best: 2011gray dashed: rival programs · ○ the program when he took over · Dashed segments are program changes — spacing is not proportional to calendar time

Bowls and playoffs: 4-6

West Virginia’11W’12L’14L’15W’16L’17L’18LHouston’20L’21W’22W

Show all 10 games
West Virginia2011Orange BowlW 70-332012Pinstripe BowlL 14-382014Liberty BowlL 37-452015Cactus BowlW 43-422016Russell Athletic BowlL 14-312017Heart of Dallas BowlL 14-302018Camping World BowlL 18-34Houston2020New Mexico BowlL 14-282021Birmingham BowlW 17-132022Independence BowlW 23-16

Nebraska offensive coordinator, 2026

This winter

8%chance he leaves this winter for a head-coaching job or a bigger coordinator job — including going with his head coach if he’s hired awaySettled113th-highest of 329 FBS coordinators
0%50%+

Our poach model, on his team’s results so far, how his unit compares with the FBS average this season and last, his program’s standing and his role. Ranked against the 329 FBS coordinators with 3+ games this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.

What drives his number

The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS coordinator today.

  • ▲ Higher
    An offensive coordinator
  • ▼ Lower
    A Power Four program · 69th percentile of FBS in program stature last season
  • ▲ Higher
    His offense scores 3.9 points a game more than the FBS average · last season his offense scored 1.5 more
How good is this number? It ranks a coordinator who moves up ahead of one who stays 71 to 73% of the time, and its average matches the share who actually move. What it can’t do

Tested on every FBS coordinator from 2018 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it: from three games on, given one coordinator who moved up and one who didn’t, it ranked the one who moved ahead 71 to 73% of the time, and its average chance came within a tenth of a point of the share who actually moved.

  • Counting a coordinator who follows his hired-away head coach as moving up was decided after the model’s first results were seen.
  • Much of the signal comes through his head coach: coordinators often move because their boss is hired away. This site’s number for head coaches is now live, on each head coach’s page, but this number doesn’t use it.
  • Moves to NFL coordinator jobs are undercounted in the history it learned from; they were found mainly for coordinators with Wikipedia pages.
  • On its own it is weak at picking which coordinator lands a head-coaching job (about 60% on the same test). The number is about moving up by any route.
  • It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.

Report card

Offense carries it: 53rd percentile offense, below the median defense at 40th.

Houston, every completed season graded against the whole field, then averaged.

Offense

B-
of which —53rd
efficiency — 53rd percentile success rate, 2019–24
B-55th
Standard-downs success
B-55th
Passing-downs success
B-58th
Trench push (line yards)
B-59th
Red-zone scoring rate
C-30th
Power-success (short yardage)
C-35th
Ball security (giveaways per game)

Defense

C
of which —40th
40th percentile SP+ defense, 2019–24
B+73rd
Front-7 havoc
B68th
Secondary havoc
B+72nd
Stuff rate (run defense)
C-32nd
Takeaways per game

Each season is his team’s percentile among every team with that stat (the share it beat), averaged over his completed seasons here; a mid-season takeover year and the season in progress aren’t graded. Letters: A+ 90th percentile and up, A 80, B+ 70, B 60, B− 50, C+ 45, C 40, C− 30, D 15, F below.