Matt Drinkall

3-4This season at Central Michigan
10-10Career
Program lift
Year 2
graded once a job reaches 3 seasons
See Central Michigan’s full coaching history →

Career arc

Bowls and playoffs: 0-1

2025GameAbove Sports BowlL 7-34
Part one · This week

As of Fri Oct 23

Saturday: vs. Miami (OH)

Sat Oct 24, 1 pm ET ESPN+ · Miami (OH) is 4-3 · First meeting between Drinkall and Chuck Martin as head coaches · Central Michigan’s chance to win: 37% (the site’s model)

5 stories this week →

The headlines, Oct 18–23 from 4 outlets

Fan threads naming him, Oct 18–23: 1, from 1 person.

Offense: 92nd of 138 per play. Defense: 96th.

Offense, per play92ndPassing offense126thDefense, per play96thDefense, knocking offenses off schedule127thWorstBest
Offense, per play92nd of 138Passing offense126th of 138Defense, per play96th of 138Defense, knocking offenses off schedule127th of 138WorstBest
Through 7 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Central Michigan. The other two rows are where Central Michigan stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.

5 games left

  1. Sat Oct 24vs. Miami (OH) (4-3)ESPN+37%
  2. Wed Nov 4vs. Eastern Michigan (4-4)59%
  3. Wed Nov 11vs. Sacramento State (1-6)87%
  4. Wed Nov 18at Buffalo (4-3)42%
  5. Sat Nov 28at Ball State (2-5)55%

Percent: Central Michigan’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.

How the season got here

Where Central Michigan stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).

104th110th116thPreseason110thNew Mexico L 7-38New Mexico L 7-38L 7-38New Mexico110thColgate W 13-10Colgate W 13-10W 13-10Colgate111thWyoming W 24-10Wyoming W 24-10W 24-10Wyoming111thMiami L 3-52Miami L 3-52L 3-52Miami110thAkron W 41-17Akron W 41-17W 41-17Akron110thOhio L 14-31Ohio L 14-31L 14-31Ohio111thWestern Michigan L 14-21Western Michigan L 14-21L 14-21Western Michi…110th
  1. Oct 12–18L 14-21 vs. Western Michigan0 headlines
  2. Oct 5–11L 14-31 at Ohio0 headlines
  3. Sep 28–Oct 4W 41-17 vs. Akron0 headlines
  4. Sep 21–27 · rebuiltL 3-52 at Miami0 headlines
  5. Sep 14–20 · rebuiltW 24-10 vs. Wyoming0 headlines
  6. Sep 7–13 · rebuiltW 13-10 vs. Colgate0 headlines

Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.

Watch the biggest plays from Central Michigan’s games, ranked by how much each moved the chance to win.

Central Michigan

12 stories about him this season

from 11 outlets

Aug 1 to Aug 7: 4Aug 8 to Aug 14: 1Aug 29 to Sep 4: 1Sep 12 to Sep 18: 1Oct 17 to Oct 23: 5L 7-38 at New MexicoLW 13-10 vs ColgateWW 24-10 vs WyomingWL 3-52 at MiamiLW 41-17 vs AkronWL 14-31 at OhioLL 14-21 vs Western MichiganLAug 1Oct 23Most in a week: 5
Aug 1 to Aug 7: 4Aug 8 to Aug 14: 1Aug 29 to Sep 4: 1Sep 12 to Sep 18: 1Oct 17 to Oct 23: 5L 7-38 at New MexicoLW 13-10 vs ColgateWW 24-10 vs WyomingWL 3-52 at MiamiLW 41-17 vs AkronWL 14-31 at OhioLL 14-21 vs Western MichiganLAug 1Oct 23Most in a week: 5
Gold: stories about him each week. W and L: his games. Counted from Aug 1, when tracking began.

What they’re talking about

Press conference and quotes4 stories
Conference and schedule2 stories

Could another school hire him? What has he said?

Stories are headlines grouped by what they are about, counted through Oct 23.

In his own words

Awaiting signal — no quotes collected from this staff yet this cycle.

Part two · The hire

Hires into jobs like this

Hired into 13–13, Regional Program IV. Rough match, not calibrated yet — ranked on what the job inherited alone. Coaches hired into this same job aren’t used as comps.

Of the 5 closest comps, 2 left the program higher than he found it and 3 left it lower. Median stay: 6 seasons.
Every coach hired into a Regional Program IV job since 1990 (89): typically -0.9 after year 1, -1.3 after year 2.
band ends: fewer than 15 hires still in the job+4what he inherited-4hiredyr 1yr 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr 6yr 7yr 8yr 9yr 10Bohl: +5.9 vs. inheritedLoeffler: -0.2 vs. inheritedGeorge: -2 vs. inheritedChristensen: -0.1 vs. inheritedLeipold: +2.9 vs. inheritedDrinkall: +0.1 vs. inherited▏ Bohl +5.9▏ Leipold +2.9Drinkall +0.1▏ Christensen -0.1▏ Loeffler -0.2▏ George -2
→ Wyoming, 2014
4–8 · 2–10 · 8–6 · 8–5 · 6–6 · 8–5 · 2–4 · 7–6 · 7–6 · 9–4
10 seasons
+5.9 vs. what he inherited
→ Bowling Green, 2019
3–9 · 0–5 · 4–8 · 6–7 · 7–6 · 7–6
6 seasons
-0.2 vs. what he inherited
→ Bowling Green, 2025
4–8 · 2–5
2 seasons
-2.0 vs. what he inherited
→ Wyoming, 2009
7–6 · 3–9 · 8–5 · 4–8 · 5–7
5 seasons
-0.1 vs. what he inherited
→ Buffalo, 2015
5–7 · 2–10 · 6–6 · 10–4 · 8–5 · 6–1
6 seasons
+2.9 vs. what he inherited
Résumé
Previous stops: Kansas Wesleyan (2014–2018)
No single prior tenure of 4+ seasons to profile.
The job he took
Followed Jim McElwain (2019–2024), after the season
33–36
Program was sliding in the 2022–2024 run-up.
A Regional Program IV job.
Rivalry record so far
Victory Cannon vs. Western Michigan0–2
Michigan MAC Trophy (EMU-CMU) vs. Eastern Michigan1–0
How new coaches start here
  • Jim McElwain20198–6+0.2
  • John Bonamego20157–6-0.1
  • Dan Enos20103–9-0.4
  • Butch Jones20078–6+1.3
  • Brian Kelly20044–7+0.1
  • Mike DeBord20002–9-3.1
  • Dick Flynn19949–3-0.3
  • Herb Deromedi19789–2+1.9

This season

4%chance he’s out by the end of this seasonCool73rd-hottest of 137 FBS jobs
0%50%+

Our hot-seat model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, and his contract (a bigger buyout, relative to pay, makes a change costlier). Ranked against the 137 FBS head coaches with 3+ games this season.

Now right where 2025 was at this point.

His hot seat, week by week

The chance he’s out by the end of that season, as it stood after every week of his tenure here, by today’s model.

BoilingHotWarmCool202520262025, week 3 (3 games in): 1%, 89th-hottest of 118 FBS jobs2025, week 4 (4 games in): 1%, 104th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 5 (5 games in): 1%, 108th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 6 (6 games in): 1%, 109th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 7 (6 games in): 1%, 98th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 8 (7 games in): 1%, 111th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 9 (8 games in): <1%, 112th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 10 (9 games in): 1%, 110th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 11 (9 games in): 1%, 109th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 12 (10 games in): <1%, 109th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 13 (11 games in): <1%, 111th-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 14 (12 games in): <1%, 103rd-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 15 (12 games in): <1%, 103rd-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2025, week 16 (12 games in): <1%, 103rd-hottest of 136 FBS jobs2026, week 3 (3 games in): 5%, 60th-hottest of 133 FBS jobs2026, week 4 (4 games in): 5%, 62nd-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 5 (5 games in): 3%, 80th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 6 (6 games in): 4%, 74th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 7 (7 games in): 4%, 74th-hottest of 137 FBS jobs2026, week 8 (7 games in): 4%, 73rd-hottest of 137 FBS jobsnow

Earlier seasons price the games left with power ratings rebuilt after those seasons ended.

What drives his number

The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS job today.

  • ▲ Hotter
    3-4, outscored by 63
  • ▼ Cooler
    Year 2 · tenure, which this model overrates
    (why?)

    Tenure is one of this model’s strongest inputs, but its weight was set when retirements like Nick Saban’s and Bob Stoops’ still counted as being pushed out, so it overstates how much tenure matters.

What happened to coaches like him, 2004–2025

A different comparison: past coaches, not today’s, grouped by one fact at a time. Neither line knows the games he has left or his contract, so they can sit above or below his chance.

Were 3-4 after 7 games
13% pushed out over results · of 522 coaches
Were in year 2, after 7 games
5% pushed out over results · of 473 coaches
The outcome
Pushed out over results — a firing, forced resignation, mutual parting or non-renewal, each read case by case. Leaving for a better job, or retiring on his own terms, doesn’t count.
Buyout
$2,000,000 USA Today estimate (Oct. 2025) — not a disclosed figure · 3.2× total pay · an average buyout, which barely moves his chance

How good is this number? Checked on every FBS coach from 2010 to 2025, with its percentages calibrated each season on earlier years only: they track what happened — coaches it put near 25% were out about a quarter of the time — and a version pricing the games left with the previous season’s ratings ranked jobs as well as the ranking this page used before. Each week it learns from coaches who were still on the job at that point, so a firing during the season counts. In the Boiling zone it has run a few points high. Every job, and the method.

Poach watch

This winter

8%chance he leaves this winter for a head-coaching job elsewhere, or an NFL coordinator jobSettled27th-highest of 137 FBS head coaches
0%50%+

Our poach model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, his program, his pay and his background. Ranked against the 137 FBS head coaches this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.

What drives his number

The biggest factors in his profile, each against the typical FBS head coach today. The games he has left are priced into the number, not listed here.

  • ▲ Higher
    Paid $622,450 in 2025, the 3rd percentile of published FBS head-coach pay
  • ▲ Higher
    His age is not on file · neither at his alma mater nor in the state he was born in
  • ▼ Lower
    7-6 over his previous season here
How good is this number? It ranks a head coach who leaves for another head-coaching job ahead of one who stays 78 to 82% of the time, and its average came within a point of the share who actually left. What it can’t do

Tested on every FBS head coach from 2012 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it. From three games on, given one coach who left for a head-coaching job elsewhere or an NFL coordinator job and one who stayed, it ranked the one who left ahead 79 to 82% of the time; in a season’s first two games, 78%. Its average chance came within a point of the share who actually left. It counts a move a coach makes while he still holds the job; when his school ends it, that doesn’t count, even if another school then hires him.

  • The live number prices the games he has left with the power model’s ratings from this season. The test priced them with each team’s rating from the season before, because ratings made during past seasons were not kept, so this live version could not be replayed.
  • Programs new to FBS have no FBS record before this season in the data it reads, so their coaches are scored without one.
  • It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.
  • A coach hired in December needs his background (age, alma mater, the state he was born in) added before his first game, or he shows as not rated.
Part three · The career

Coaching career

2025–now
Central Michigan
too new to grade yet

Followed Jim McElwain (2019–2024).

System Shift, on arrival
Season20252026Trend
Record & result
Record7-63-4
PostseasonL bowl—
Coordinators
OCJim Chapin / Derek FultonJim Chapin / Derek Fulton
DCSean CroninSean Cronin
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense3428
Defense8122
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%32.531.0
Red-zone pass%23.122.2
4th-down go%opp. territory38.961.9
Recruiter or developer?

Performs about as expected for his recruiting talent on offense and outperforms his recruiting talent on defense.

Offense vs. talent
-1.7 pts
#116 of 208 · middle half
Defense vs. talent
+43.1 pts
#2 of 208 · top quarter
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Who they bring in

Brings in smaller-than-position-typical players than most.

Recruits younger transfers than most — more of a development bet.

Avg. size (raw)
6′1″, 231 lbs
across 12 of 22 arrivals — unadjusted for position mix
Size vs. position-typical
-1.8 lbs
#243 of 255 · bottom quarter
Avg. class year
So
#245 of 255 · bottom quarter
Avg. portal rating
2.9★
rated arrivals only
Top states: IA (2), IN (2), OH (2), MI (2), MA (1)
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
41.7
position-weighted
Talent lost
55.4
position-weighted
Net
-13.6
arrivals minus departures
Best addition: Angel Flores (QB) from Northern Arizona
Biggest loss: Joe Labas (QB) to the portal
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.
Does the system survive a coordinator change?
OC: Jim Chapin / Derek Fulton (co) → Jim Chapin (co) / Derek Fulton (co) · 2026
34th pct28th pct0th100th
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
1st-down pass rate: 32.5% → 31.0% (-1.4 pts)
Confound, shown not hidden: only 54% of offensive production returned the year the coordinator changed — the roster turned over at the same time, not just the play-caller.
DC: Sean Cronin → Sean Cronin · 2026
81st pct22nd pct0th100th
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
Where the roster comes from, by position
Buys Tight end via the portal
67%
#23 of 188 stints
Grows Edge from high school
100%
#191 of 208 stints
Grows Linebacker from high school
100%
#205 of 225 stints
Postseason detail2025: Lost to Northwestern 7-34 GameAbove Sports Bowl

AI Narratives — “Central Michigan — stat check”.

10-10

Big games

The big-game ledger

How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.

1-2 against his rivals.

Rivalry record
1-2
33.3% · 2 rivals
One-score games
2-3
40.0% · margin ≤8
Against Blue Bloods or better
0-1
0.0%
Against the spread
11-9
−0.4 pts a game vs. the line
all 20 had a line
Rivalry ledger
Western Michigan0-20%ATS —
Eastern Michigan1-0100%ATS —
Performance by opponent class
Blue Blood
0-1 0.0%ATS —
Power Program
0-2 0.0%ATS —
National Program
0-2 0.0%ATS —
Regional Program
8-5 61.5%ATS 10-3 13 of 13

ATS is his record against the spread: did his team beat the closing betting line, winning by more than it or losing by less? Lines start in 2013; a dash means fewer than 6 of those games had one. One-score games carry no spread record: a big favorite that wins a close game has almost always failed to cover, so that number would say nothing about the coach.

Signature games

0-2 vs. AP top 25 · 0-1 vs. the top 10
Signature wins
W
Eastern Michigan · 2025
24-13
RivalQuality opponent
W
San José State · 2025
16-14
UpsetQuality opponent
W
Bowling Green · 2025
27-6
UpsetQuality opponent
Signature losses
L
Northwestern · 2025
7-34
Bowl/CFP stakes
L
Western Michigan · 2026
14-21
Rival
L
Western Michigan · 2025
21-24
Rival

Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.

How he plays

Run/pass mix, by field position

Ran more than the situation called for under Chapin.

782 run and pass snaps at Central Michigan, 2025–2025, his own games, one row per offensive coordinator. Each cell is how much more often he passed than the rest of FBS did in the same situation (field zone, down, distance, score, quarter, same season), in percentage points.

passed moreran morewithin noise (95% range includes 0)
Pass rate, stint by stint

Where each stint’s offense sat between run-first and pass-first, and how far it moved from one season to the next, against the FBS-wide average of 41% pass. The band is that stint’s real season-to-season range, not a fixed-width box.

30%40%FBS avg 41%Central Michigan2025–2026▲ 2.2pt
Pass rate — share of offensive plays that were pass attemptsfirst covered seasonmost recent covered season

How good is he so far?

Too new to grade — in-season movement only
Central Michigan’s composite stature has fallen since preseason: 13.6 entering the year to 13.0 through week 8 (Regional Program IV) · #79 of 138 in movement since preseason · middle half.
Part four · How he builds a team

Three numbers on how he actually stocks a roster, from signing day to draft day.

  1. 1His recruiting
  2. 2Roster ownership
  3. 3Where he recruits

His recruiting, really

#95Nationally, his own classes

His one ranked Central Michigan class of his own finished #95 nationally.

2025
#113
Transition
2026
#95
His class

His class — he had the full signing cycleTransition — he was hired mid-cycle

Rank is each signing class’s national recruiting rank (#1 is best). Only a class he had a full signing cycle to build counts as his; inherited and mid-transition classes still show here, faded, but stay out of the average.

Roster ownership

Roster ownership

73%His own players

of his 2026 roster arrived on his watch — 82 of 113 players. The other 31 are holdovers from before he was hired.

Arrived under him 82Inherited 31

Of his own players on this roster, 8% came through the transfer portal; the rest are non-portal arrivals (high-school signees, JUCO transfers, walk-ons).

Everyone he has brought in, 2025–2026Counting players who have since left: 12% of the 96 arrivals we can classify came through the portal.

“His own” means the player arrived while he was head coach; “inherited” means a predecessor brought him in.

Where he recruits

MITop state

is his biggest recruiting state: 19 of 52 signees (37%) across his 2025–2026 tenure, drawn from 16 states in all. Next: CA (7).

Where his signees came from, 2025–2026 (52 high-school, JUCO and prep signees)

52% of his signees come from MI and its 3 border states (IN 3, WI 3, OH 2).

1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee2 signees1 signee1 signee2 signees1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee2 signees1 signee4 signees1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee1 signee
By region
Midwest
33
West
10
South
7
Northeast
2
Roster distance from campus (Kelly/Shorts Stadium, MI)
median hometown distance
331 mi
within 100 mi
19%
within 500 mi
56%
beyond 1,000 mi
25%
103 of 113 roster players with a known hometown (91% coverage)

The map counts signed recruits across his tenure; the distance figures cover his current roster, transfers and walk-ons included. Two different groups, kept separate on purpose.