This week · as of Wed Nov 4

6-2, won 5 straight, on track for 9-3 in the regular season.

Now

Career arc

Stature score reached, by season of his head-coaching careerFBS medianTexas TechLouisiana TechSouthern MissSouthern MissNational Programrespectable, streakyRegional Programthe building-block levelTexas Tech when he took over: 31.7 (National Program II), its final 2020 readingtook overTexas Tech, 2021: 2-3, National Program IITexas Tech, 2021: 2-3, National Program II20212-3-0.1Louisiana Tech when he took over: 21.7 (Regional Program II), its final 2021 readingtook overLouisiana Tech, 2022: 3-9, Regional Program IIILouisiana Tech, 2022: 3-9, Regional Program III20223-9Louisiana Tech, 2023: 3-9, Regional Program III20233-9Louisiana Tech, 2024: 5-8, Regional Program IV20245-8Louisiana Tech, 2025: 8-5, Regional Program IV20258-5Louisiana Tech, 2026: 6-2, Regional Program IVLouisiana Tech, 2026: 6-2, Regional Program IV20266-2-8.2best: 2021gray dashed: rival programs · ○ the program when he took over · Dashed segments are program changes — spacing is not proportional to calendar time

Bowls and playoffs: 2-1

Texas Tech2021Liberty BowlW 34-7Louisiana Tech2024Independence BowlL 6-272025Independence BowlW 23-14

This week Wed Nov 4

  • Last gameW 35-20 at South Alabama Sat Oct 31
  • This season6-2 won 5 straight
  • On track for9-3 regular season
  • Nextat Troy Sat Nov 7
  • Stature103rd of 138 FBS programs

What the result changed

  • Playoff odds 0.8% → 1% CFB Zeitgeist forecast, before and after

Saturday: at Troy

Sat Nov 7, 4 pm ET ESPN+ · Troy is 4-4 · First meeting between Cumbie and Gerad Parker as head coaches · Louisiana Tech’s chance to win: 80% (the site’s model)

His week

No headlines named him in the last 7 days

What they are talking about, week and season

Offense: 63rd of 138 per play. Defense: 19th.

Offense, per play63rdOffense, starting field position12thDefense, per play19thDefense, points allowed per trip inside the 406thWorstBest
Offense, per play63rd of 138Offense, starting field position12th of 138Defense, per play19th of 138Defense, points allowed per trip inside the 406th of 138WorstBest
Through 8 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Louisiana Tech. The other two rows are where Louisiana Tech stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.

4 games left

  1. Sat Nov 7at Troy (4-4)ESPN+80%
  2. Sat Nov 14vs. Southern Miss (3-5)ESPN+87%
  3. Sat Nov 21vs. Arkansas State (4-4)83%
  4. Sat Nov 28at Georgia Southern (4-4)60%

Percent: Louisiana Tech’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.

How the season got here

Where Louisiana Tech stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).

101st108th114thPreseason111thNorthwestern State W 80-6Northwestern State W 80-6W 80-6Northwestern …111thLSU L 14-45LSU L 14-45L 14-45LSU109thBaylor L 19-36Baylor L 19-36L 19-36Baylor109thArmy W 31-29Army W 31-29W 31-29Army109thLouisiana W 32-31Louisiana W 32-31W 32-31Louisiana108thUL Monroe W 24-0UL Monroe W 24-0W 24-0UL Monroe106thOld Dominion W 26-0Old Dominion W 26-0W 26-0Old Dominion106thSouth Alabama W 35-20South Alabama W 35-20W 35-20South Alabama104th
  1. Oct 26–Nov 1W 35-20 at South Alabama0 headlines
  2. Oct 19–25W 26-0 vs. Old Dominion0 headlines
  3. Oct 12–18W 24-0 at UL Monroe0 headlines
  4. Oct 5–11W 32-31 vs. Louisiana1 headline · 83rd of 138
  5. Sep 28–Oct 4W 31-29 vs. Army0 headlines
  6. Sep 21–27 · rebuiltNo game0 headlines

Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.

Watch the biggest plays from Louisiana Tech’s games, ranked by how much each moved the chance to win.

Report card

Below the median on both sides of the ball — 38th percentile offense, 27th percentile defense.

Louisiana Tech, every completed season graded against the whole field, then averaged.

Offense

C-
of which —38th
efficiency — 38th percentile success rate, 2022–25
C44th
Standard-downs success
D26th
Passing-downs success
D29th
Trench push (line yards)
C-35th
Red-zone scoring rate
C+47th
Power-success (short yardage)
D27th
Ball security (giveaways per game)

Defense

D
of which —27th
27th percentile SP+ defense, 2022–25
B+70th
Front-7 havoc
B69th
Secondary havoc
B-55th
Stuff rate (run defense)
B-56th
Takeaways per game

Each season is his team’s percentile among every team with that stat (the share it beat), averaged over his completed seasons here; a mid-season takeover year and the season in progress aren’t graded. Letters: A+ 90th percentile and up, A 80, B+ 70, B 60, B− 50, C+ 45, C 40, C− 30, D 15, F below.

Poach watch

This winter

29%chance he leaves this winter for a head-coaching job elsewhere, or an NFL coordinator jobWanted6th-highest of 132 FBS head coaches
0%50%+

Our poach model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, his program, his pay and his background. Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.

What drives his number

The biggest factors in his profile, each against the typical FBS head coach today. The games he has left are priced into the number, not listed here.

  • ▲ Higher
    His team is 6-2, outscoring opponents by 11.8 points a game
  • ▲ Higher
    Age 45 · neither at his alma mater nor in the state he was born in
  • ▼ Lower
    13-13 over his previous two seasons here
How good is this number? It ranks a head coach who leaves for another head-coaching job ahead of one who stays 78 to 82% of the time, and its average came within a point of the share who actually left. What it can’t do

Tested on every FBS head coach from 2012 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it. From three games on, given one coach who left for a head-coaching job elsewhere or an NFL coordinator job and one who stayed, it ranked the one who left ahead 79 to 82% of the time; in a season’s first two games, 78%. Its average chance came within a point of the share who actually left. It counts a move a coach makes while he still holds the job; when his school ends it, that doesn’t count, even if another school then hires him.

  • The live number prices the games he has left with the power model’s ratings from this season. The test priced them with each team’s rating from the season before, because ratings made during past seasons were not kept, so this live version could not be replayed.
  • Programs new to FBS have no FBS record before this season in the data it reads, so their coaches are scored without one.
  • It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.
  • A coach hired in December needs his background (age, alma mater, the state he was born in) added before his first game, or he shows as not rated.