CFB Zeitgeist Score
45
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 68th percentile.
Kyle Parker
Kyle Parker arrives at LSU with a new fit to prove and an old chapter behind him.
4★ · NATIONAL RECRUIT
No.330
recruiting national rank
LSU fans treat him as a favorite son; the bond outlasts the box score.
AI narrative · updated 2026-06-22 · compiled from CFB Zeitgeist data
Where He Ended Up · Transfer
Transferred to Ohio State
WR · LSU · SEC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
45
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 68th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#985
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterStarter. A locked-in starting role.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2024–2025Up 500% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4-star | 0.9002 | No. 330 recruit | HighSchool | LSU |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | LSU -> Ohio State | 3-star | 0.8700 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★☆
to LSU
Composite
0.9002
#330 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
62
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
4
count
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#161 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving TDs — 4 TDs on 31 receptions.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=31 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 1 at Houston — 1 receiving_tds
Result L 35-38
The week the volume broke through — stacked 1 td at Houston.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 330): needs 123.3/game over remaining 3.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 330): needs 223.3/game over remaining 3.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 31): needs 9.7/game over remaining 3.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 31): needs 16.3/game over remaining 3.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 4): needs 1.3/game over remaining 3.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 4): needs 2/game over remaining 3.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Kyle Parker's story is about how role and output meet each other. For LSU, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Receiving weapon against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Returns
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 10 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 17-10@ Clemson | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 | 16 | |
| Wk 4 | W 56-10vs SE Louisiana | 4 | 52 | 13.0 | 1 | 27 | |
| Wk 5 | L 19-24@ Ole Miss | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 0 | 10 | |
| Wk 7 | W 20-10vs South Carolina | 5 | 75 | 15.0 | 1 | 43 | Season-high 75 yds |
| Wk 8 | L 24-31@ Vanderbilt | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 | |
| Wk 9 | L 25-49vs Texas A&M | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 1 | 12 | |
| Wk 12 | W 23-22vs Arkansas | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 10 | |
| Wk 13 | W 13-10vs Western Kentucky | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 0 | 23 | |
| Wk 14 | L 13-17@ Oklahoma | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 10 | |
| Bowl | L 35-38@ Houston | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 1 | 19 | |
| Total | 31 | 330 | 11.0 | 4 | 43 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 31 | #268/1110 | 76th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 330 | #331/1107 | 70th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 4 | #152/1111 | 86th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 10.6 | #691/1106 | 38th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return yards | 35 | #148/238 | 38th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 8.1% | #602/1137 | 47th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 43 | #385/1105 | 65th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return avg | 17.5 | #152/236 | 36th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick returns | 2 | #132/243 | 46th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 7.7% | #406/1137 | 64th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 6.1% | #540/1137 | 53rd pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 5.0% | #509/1137 | 55th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 4.9% | #497/1137 | 56th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 3.5% | #630/1137 | 45th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 3.5% | #604/1137 | 47th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.0% | #391/1137 | 66th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 10 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home5g | 3.2 | 39.2 | 11.8 | 0.6 |
| Road5g | 3.0 | 26.8 | 10.1 | 0.2 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins5g | 2.8 | 38.4 | 13.7 | 0.4 |
| Losses5g | 3.4 | 27.6 | 8.2 | 0.4 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-75g | 4.2 | 46.8 | 11.9 | 0.6 |
| Weeks 8+5g | 2.0 | 19.2 | 10.0 | 0.2 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Concern: yards / catch (21st).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Reliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Miles Cross’s 2024 season.
Miles Cross
Logan Loya
Drake Stoops
DJ Allen
Tyler Page
Matches Miles on
Differs from Miles on
Through 1 college season, his career arc tracks closest to Elijah Steward’s path through Lafayette.
Elijah Steward
Derick Eugene
Jacquon Gibson
Tyler Brown
Mike Harley
Matches Elijah on
As a sophomore, his production profile tracks closest to Michael Hetzel's sophomore season at App State (2023).
Michael Hetzel
Mar'Keise Irving
Antonio Williams
Jacquon Gibson
Larry Stephens
Matches Michael on
Differs from Michael on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Brian Kelly
Pass share
55.0%
443 pass / 363 run
Plays / game
62.0
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
6.8%
365 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced, slow tempo.
Coaching Lineage · 2024–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Brian Kelly.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.