Kyle Flood

Head coach, Rutgers, 2012 to 2015

Now

Career arc

Stature score reached, by season of his head-coaching careerFBS medianRutgersMarylandMarylandNational Programrespectable, streakyRegional Programthe building-block levelRutgers when he took over: 28.1 (National Program III), its final 2011 readingtook overRutgers, 2012: 9-4, National Program IIRutgers, 2012: 9-4, National Program II20129-4Rutgers, 2013: 6-7, National Program III20136-7Rutgers, 2014: 8-5, National Program III20148-5Rutgers, 2015: 4-8, National Program IIIRutgers, 2015: 4-8, National Program III20154-8+0.8best: 2012gray dashed: rival programs · ○ the program when he took over · Dashed segments are program changes — spacing is not proportional to calendar time

Bowls and playoffs: 1-2

2012Russell Athletic BowlL 10-132013Pinstripe BowlL 16-292014Quick Lane BowlW 40-21

Texas offensive coordinator, 2026

This winter

10%chance he leaves this winter for a head-coaching job or a bigger coordinator job — including going with his head coach if he’s hired awayNoticed68th-highest of 329 FBS coordinators
0%50%+

Our poach model, on his team’s results so far, how his unit compares with the FBS average this season and last, his program’s standing and his role. Ranked against the 329 FBS coordinators with 3+ games this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.

What drives his number

The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS coordinator today.

  • ▲ Higher
    An offensive coordinator
  • ▼ Lower
    A Power Four program · 94th percentile of FBS in program stature last season
  • ▲ Higher
    His offense scores 2.3 points a game more than the FBS average · last season his offense scored 1.9 more
  • ▲ Higher
    His team is 6-2, outscoring opponents by 13.6 points a game · AP-ranked
How good is this number? It ranks a coordinator who moves up ahead of one who stays 71 to 73% of the time, and its average matches the share who actually move. What it can’t do

Tested on every FBS coordinator from 2018 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it: from three games on, given one coordinator who moved up and one who didn’t, it ranked the one who moved ahead 71 to 73% of the time, and its average chance came within a tenth of a point of the share who actually moved.

  • Counting a coordinator who follows his hired-away head coach as moving up was decided after the model’s first results were seen.
  • Much of the signal comes through his head coach: coordinators often move because their boss is hired away. This site’s number for head coaches is now live, on each head coach’s page, but this number doesn’t use it.
  • Moves to NFL coordinator jobs are undercounted in the history it learned from; they were found mainly for coordinators with Wikipedia pages.
  • On its own it is weak at picking which coordinator lands a head-coaching job (about 60% on the same test). The number is about moving up by any route.
  • It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.

Report card

Offense carries it: 53rd percentile offense, bottom-quarter defense at 18th.

Rutgers, every completed season graded against the whole field, then averaged.

Offense

B-
of which —53rd
efficiency — 53rd percentile success rate, 2012–15
B-53rd
Standard-downs success
C+49th
Passing-downs success
C+45th
Trench push (line yards)
B-58th
Red-zone scoring rate
B-51st
Power-success (short yardage)
C43rd
Ball security (giveaways per game)

Defense

D
of which —18th
18th percentile SP+ defense, 2014–15 (SP+ starts 2014)
F0th
Front-7 havoc
C-39th
Secondary havoc
B+79th
Stuff rate (run defense)
C-38th
Takeaways per game

Each season is his team’s percentile among every team with that stat (the share it beat), averaged over his completed seasons here; a mid-season takeover year and the season in progress aren’t graded. Letters: A+ 90th percentile and up, A 80, B+ 70, B 60, B− 50, C+ 45, C 40, C− 30, D 15, F below.