Suppose how many games Miami would have won if they was in the Southeastern conference!!??
Miami had a great QB as backup. That Nickel kid is great!!
Mark Matthews 5* OL from STA Currently Commited to TAMU 2.0 The 1.0 thread went off the rails, @OBLIVION locked it and said I should create a new thread should real news surface. Unverified (somewhat dubious) source says a flip could be coming and Fawcett says a big flip is coming so creating 2.0 just in case. https://247sports.com/Player/mark-matthews-46145576/ ... Read more
Fan mood · last 3 weeks · more upbeat than 3 in 4 FBS fan bases
Offense: 2nd of 138 per play. Defense: 38th.
Through 8 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Miami. The other two rows are where Miami stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.
4 games left
Sat Nov 7at NDNotre Dame (7-1)35%
Sat Nov 14vs. DUKEDuke (6-2)80%
Sat Nov 21vs. VTVirginia Tech (6-2)90%
Sat Nov 28vs. BCBoston College (4-4)97%
Percent: Miami’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.
How the season got here
Where Miami stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).
Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.
Each season is his team’s percentile among every team with that stat (the share it beat), averaged over his completed seasons here; a mid-season takeover year and the season in progress aren’t graded. Letters: A+ 90th percentile and up, A 80, B+ 70, B 60, B− 50, C+ 45, C 40, C− 30, D 15, F below.
<1%chance he’s out by the end of this seasonCool126th-hottest of 132 FBS jobs
0%50%+
Our hot-seat model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, and his contract (a bigger buyout, relative to pay, makes a change costlier). Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches with 3+ games this season.
One national title game here, lost in 2025 — in 2022–2025, when every season ended Cool. Now right where 2025 was at this point.
How his seat has moved, and why
His hot seat, week by week
The chance he’s out by the end of that season, as it stood after every week of his tenure here, by today’s model.
← swipe for earlier seasons
Earlier seasons price the games left with power ratings rebuilt after those seasons ended.
What drives his number
The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS job today.
▼ Cooler
8-0, outscoring opponents by 239 · AP-ranked
▲ Hotter
Year 5· tenure, which this model overrates(why?)
Tenure is one of this model’s strongest inputs, but its weight was set when retirements like Nick Saban’s and Bob Stoops’ still counted as being pushed out, so it overstates how much tenure matters.
▼ Cooler
23-6 over his previous two seasons here
What happened to coaches like him, 2004–2025
A different comparison: past coaches, not today’s, grouped by one fact at a time. Neither line knows the games he has left or his contract, so they can sit above or below his chance.
Were 8-0 after 8 games
0% pushed out over results · of 132 coaches
Were in years 5-9, after 8 games
14% pushed out over results · of 700 coaches
The outcome
Pushed out over results — a firing, forced resignation, mutual parting or non-renewal, each read case by case. Leaving for a better job, or retiring on his own terms, doesn’t count.
Buyout
$33,221,422imputed from total pay — not a reported figure· 4.0× total pay· a large buyout, which lowers his chance of being let go
How good is this number? Checked on every FBS coach from 2010 to 2025, with its percentages calibrated each season on earlier years only: they track what happened — coaches it put near 25% were out about a quarter of the time — and a version pricing the games left with the previous season’s ratings ranked jobs as well as the ranking this page used before. Each week it learns from coaches who were still on the job at that point, so a firing during the season counts. In the Boiling zone it has run a few points high. Every job, and the method.
Our poach model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, his program, his pay and his background. Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.
What drives his number
The biggest factors in his profile, each against the typical FBS head coach today. The games he has left are priced into the number, not listed here.
▼ Lower
Age 56 · coaching at his alma mater, in the state he was born in
▲ Higher
His team is 8-0, outscoring opponents by 29.9 points a game · AP-ranked
▼ Lower
Paid $8.3 million in 2025, the 86th percentile of published FBS head-coach pay · up 7% on the season before
How good is this number? It ranks a head coach who leaves for another head-coaching job ahead of one who stays 78 to 82% of the time, and its average came within a point of the share who actually left. What it can’t do
Tested on every FBS head coach from 2012 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it. From three games on, given one coach who left for a head-coaching job elsewhere or an NFL coordinator job and one who stayed, it ranked the one who left ahead 79 to 82% of the time; in a season’s first two games, 78%. Its average chance came within a point of the share who actually left. It counts a move a coach makes while he still holds the job; when his school ends it, that doesn’t count, even if another school then hires him.
The live number prices the games he has left with the power model’s ratings from this season. The test priced them with each team’s rating from the season before, because ratings made during past seasons were not kept, so this live version could not be replayed.
Programs new to FBS have no FBS record before this season in the data it reads, so their coaches are scored without one.
It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.
A coach hired in December needs his background (age, alma mater, the state he was born in) added before his first game, or he shows as not rated.
Fans
Fan chatter
Oct 31W 38-35 at North CarolinaTypical Cristobal mid/late season poor performance. Has happened the last 3-4 years.MIAMiami fan
Oct 24W 52-23 vs. PittsburghCristobal plays with fire I freaking hate itMIAMiami fan
Oct 17W 43-35 vs. Florida Statemario cristobal situational football everybodyMIAMiami fan
Earlier weeks
Oct 3W 41-13 at ClemsonIts the Miami Cristobal wayMIAMiami fan
Sep 18W 33-20 at Wake ForestChat can we kneel the ball? Is this allowed for Cristobal Miami?MIAMiami fan
Sep 10W 77-7 vs. Florida A&MDo you hate us because we're Miami or Cristobal?MIAMiami fan
Sep 4W 45-6 at StanfordCristobal needs to sit Toney. Why is he fielding punts up several scores.MIAMiami fan
Many stories about him this week
Sat Nov 7: Notre Dame
35th of 104 FBS head coaches · from several outlets and r/CFB
Gold: stories about him each day. W and L: his games.
Most about: press conference and quotes, recruiting, contract and pay.
[Steve Wiltfong] Mario Cristobal has made Oregon a Pac-12 Recruiting SuperpowerAug 2
Will Mario Cristobal’s belief in where the Oregon Ducks are headed converge with where they are in season opener against Auburn?Aug 29
Matt Prehm on Twitter: "Mario Cristobal says Mycah Pittman and Brenden Schooler will return to practice after the bye week. Said there is a chance they'd then play against California."Sep 16
Mario Cristobal: "Execute things we do at practice"Oct 28
Rob Moseley on Twitter: "Mario Cristobal on his "secret sauce" in recruiting: "The secret sauce is being real. We have a tremendous passion for the University of Oregon. We all feel, without a shred of doubt, that this is the best place in the entire country." #GoDucks"Dec 18
Gold: stories we tracked each season, drawn on a square-root scale so a quiet year still shows. Hatched: before we started tracking (2019). Earlier years had thinner coverage, so compare within a stop, not across decades.
Stories are headlines grouped by what they are about, counted through Nov 4.
Stats
Big games
Pick a job to see its years on their own.
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’07’08’09’12
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WTO
Toledo · 2010
34-32
Quality opponentBowl/CFP stakes
WLO
Louisville · 2011
24-17
Quality opponent
WTR
Troy · 2010
52-35
Quality opponent
Signature losses
LMR
Marshall · 2011
10-20
Bowl/CFP stakes
LFA
Florida Atlantic · 2007
23-55
LPS
Penn State · 2007
0-59
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
6-1 against his rivals at Oregon. Just 1-3 against Kyle Whittingham.
’18 L · blew a 3-pt lead’19 W · wire to wire’21 L’21 L
covered the spread
25% win rate across a real, 4-meeting series — short of the bar this site uses before badging a series “Nemesis.” Shown here as the toughest matchup on record, not an algorithmic crown.
Performance by opponent class
Blue Blood
1-0 100.0%ATS —
Power Program
10-6 62.5%ATS 10-6 16 of 16
National Program
12-5 70.6%ATS 6-11 17 of 17
Regional Program
9-1 90.0%ATS 4-5-1 10 of 10
Signature games
6-5 vs. AP top 25 · 3-1 vs. the top 10
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’18’19’20’21
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WOS
Ohio State · 2021
35-28
UpsetQuality opponent
WUW
Washington · 2021
26-16
RivalQuality opponent
WUW
Washington · 2019
35-31
RivalQuality opponent
Signature losses
LIS
Iowa State · 2020
17-34
Bowl/CFP stakes
LOR
Oregon State · 2020
38-41
RivalUpset
LAR
Arizona · 2018
15-44
Upset
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
6-2 against his rivals at Miami. Just 1-2 against Brent Key.
’22 W · wire to wire’23 L · blew a 10-pt lead’24 L · blew a 3-pt lead
covered the spread
33% win rate across a real, 3-meeting series — short of the bar this site uses before badging a series “Nemesis.” Shown here as the toughest matchup on record, not an algorithmic crown.
Performance by opponent class
Blue Blood
3-1 75.0%ATS —
Power Program
11-7 61.1%ATS 12-6 18 of 18
National Program
16-7 69.6%ATS 8-15 23 of 23
Regional Program
8-4 66.7%ATS 6-6 12 of 12
Signature games
5-5 vs. AP top 25 · 1-3 vs. the top 10
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’22’23’25
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WFS
Florida State · 2024
36-14
RivalQuality opponent
WOS
Ohio State · 2025
24-14
UpsetQuality opponentBowl/CFP stakes
WFS
Florida State · 2026
43-35
RivalQuality opponent
Signature losses
LFS
Florida State · 2022
3-45
Rival
LMT
Middle Tennessee · 2022
31-45
Upset
LRU
Rutgers · 2023
24-31
Bowl/CFP stakes
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
12-3 against his rivals. Just 1-4 against Howard Schnellenberger.
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’07’08’09’12’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WFS
Florida State · 2024
36-14
RivalQuality opponent
WOS
Ohio State · 2025
24-14
UpsetQuality opponentBowl/CFP stakes
WOS
Ohio State · 2021
35-28
UpsetQuality opponent
Signature losses
LFS
Florida State · 2022
3-45
Rival
LIS
Iowa State · 2020
17-34
Bowl/CFP stakes
LMT
Middle Tennessee · 2022
31-45
Upset
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
ATS is his record against the spread: did his team beat the closing betting line, winning by more than it or losing by less? Lines start in 2013; a dash means fewer than 6 of those games had one. One-score games carry no spread record: a big favorite that wins a close game has almost always failed to cover, so that number would say nothing about the coach.
Passed more than the situation called for under Dawson.
3,620 run and pass snaps at Miami, 2022–2025, his own games, one row per offensive coordinator. Each cell is how much more often he passed than the rest of FBS did in the same situation (field zone, down, distance, score, quarter, same season), in percentage points.
passed moreran morewithin noise (95% range includes 0)
Pass rate, stint by stint
Where each stint’s offense sat between run-first and pass-first, and how far it moved from one season to the next, against the FBS-wide average of 41% pass. The band is that stint’s real season-to-season range, not a fixed-width box.
Pass rate — share of offensive plays that were pass attemptsfirst covered seasonmost recent covered seasonfull season-to-season range (3+ covered seasons)
How much that is, against every other stint
Season-to-season pass-rate range for all 449 FBS coaching stints with at least three covered seasons, 2004–2025.
Typical stint7.010.3 median14.8middle half of all stints
Florida International8.2pt#293 of 449 · a typical amount
Oregon3.3pt#428 of 449 · less than most
Miami6.5pt#352 of 449 · less than most
Building the roster
Six numbers on how he actually stocks a roster, from signing day to draft day.
His 4 ranked Miami classes of his own have averaged #8 nationally — best #4, worst #13.
OROregon
2018
#13
Transition
2019
#7
His class
2020
#12
His class
2021
#6
His class
MIMiami
2022
#16
Transition
2023
#7
His class
2024
#4
His class
2025
#13
His class
2026
#9
His class
Across every program: 7 ranked classes of his own, averaging #8 nationally.
His class — he had the full signing cycleTransition — he was hired mid-cycle
Rank is each signing class’s national recruiting rank (#1 is best). Only a class he had a full signing cycle to build counts as his; inherited and mid-transition classes still show here, faded, but stay out of the average.
Followed him here
at least2players
OROregon→MIMiami2022
At least 2 players followed him from Oregon to Miami.
Jonathan Denis OL
Logan Sagapolu DL
Players who transferred from his old program to his new one through the portal in the same year he made the move. Name-matching across data sources misses some, so every count is a floor, not an exact number.
Roster ownership
Roster ownership
98%His own players
of his 2026 roster arrived on his watch — 116 of 118 players. The other 2 are holdovers from before he was hired.
Arrived under him 116Inherited 2
Of his own players on this roster, 15% came through the transfer portal; the rest are non-portal arrivals (high-school signees, JUCO transfers, walk-ons).
New players each season, 2022–2026
20% of his 268 new players since 2022 came through the portal (FBS programs, same seasons: 23%). His share was 12% in 2022 and 21% in 2026.
Graded on the players who arrived and the players who left together, his portal seasons came out better than most FBS programs’ in 1 and worse than most in 1 of the 5 seasons graded. our read
20226 of 52Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
202312 of 49Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
202411 of 72Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
202515 of 48Portal grade: better than most — #12 of 136 FBS programs that season
202610 of 47Portal grade: worse than most — #108 of 136 FBS programs that season
Came through the portalNon-portal arrivalsFBS-wide share that season
Each player counts once, in the season he arrived. 2021, the first season of portal tracking here, is left off because its arrival records look incomplete (about 31 new players per FBS team, against 52 in 2022). Portal grade: the site’s position-value-weighted scoring (the same engine as the Portal Heat feed and the “Who won the portal” grade): the value of the players who came in minus the value of the ones who left, ranked against every FBS program’s grade that same season. A season with fewer than 4 transfers in and out is not graded.
“His own” means the player arrived while he was head coach; “inherited” means a predecessor brought him in.
Size up front
Size up front
+3 lbAgainst the FBS average
Offensive linemen on his Miami rosters have averaged within a few pounds of the FBS average (2022–2026). In the three seasons before he arrived, Miami’s line averaged 6 lb heavier than the FBS average.
Florida International2010–2012−8 lb
Oregon2018–2021+11 lb
Miami2022–2026+3 lb
−10FBS avg+10lb
His seasonsSame program, the seasons before he arrivedMiddle half of FBS coaching runs since 2010
Average listed weight of every offensive lineman on each season’s roster, holdovers included, against every FBS roster that season (2010 on; a program needs 3+ seasons under him to appear). Weights are the ones programs publish, and programs list differently. This describes size only — not scheme, and not quality.
Where he recruits
FLTop state
is his biggest recruiting state: 65 of 121 signees (54%) across his 2022–2026 tenure, drawn from 22 states in all. Next: GA (11).
Where his signees came from, 2022–2026 (121 high-school, JUCO and prep signees)
67% of his signees come from FL and its 2 border states (GA 11, AL 5).
Off this map: 8 signees to the west (CA 5, NV 3).
By region
South
96
Midwest
12
West
8
Northeast
4
Feeder schoolIMG Academy5
Roster distance from campus (Hard Rock Stadium, FL)
median hometown distance
431 mi
within 100 mi
23%
within 500 mi
51%
beyond 1,000 mi
23%
110 of 118 roster players with a known hometown (93% coverage)
The map counts signed recruits across his tenure; the distance figures cover his current roster, transfers and walk-ons included. Two different groups, kept separate on purpose.
The NFL pipeline
The NFL pipeline
23Drafted
players drafted into the NFL off his teams here. He brought in 15 of them himself; 8 arrived under Manny Diaz (6), Mark Richt (2). 4 went in the first round.
His recruits 15Inherited 823 roster-verified · 0 estimated
Most recent picks first
Year
Pick
Player
Pos
NFL team
Note
2026
R1.10
Francis Mauigoa
Offensive Tackle
New York Giants
2026
R1.15
Rueben Bain Jr.
Defensive Edge
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
2026
R1.22
Akheem Mesidor
Defensive Edge
Los Angeles Chargers
2026
R3.01
Carson Beck
Quarterback
Arizona Cardinals
2026
R3.04
Markel Bell
Offensive Tackle
Philadelphia Eagles
2026
R3.34
Jakobe Thomas
Safety
Minnesota Vikings
2026
R4.16
Keionte Scott
Cornerback
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
2026
R6.07
Anez Cooper
Offensive Guard
New York Jets
Year
Pick
Player
Pos
NFL team
Note
2026
R6.16
CJ Daniels
Wide Receiver
Los Angeles Rams
2025
R1.01
Cam Ward
Quarterback
Tennessee Titans
2025
R2.18
Elijah Arroyo
Tight End
Seattle Seahawks
recruited under Manny Diaz
2025
R5.17
Jalen Rivers
Offensive Guard
Cincinnati Bengals
recruited under Manny Diaz
2025
R5.26
Francisco Mauigoa
Linebacker
New York Jets
2025
R5.40
Tyler Baron
Defensive Edge
New York Jets
2025
R6.06
Andres Borregales
Place Kicker
New England Patriots
recruited under Manny Diaz
2025
R7.07
Damien Martinez
Running Back
Seattle Seahawks
2024
R3.36
Kamren Kinchens
Safety
Los Angeles Rams
recruited under Manny Diaz
2024
R7.06
Jaden Davis
Cornerback
Arizona Cardinals
2024
R7.17
Matt Lee
Center
Cincinnati Bengals
2024
R7.22
James Williams
Safety
Tennessee Titans
recruited under Manny Diaz
2023
R2.25
Tyrique Stevenson
Cornerback
Chicago Bears
recruited under Manny Diaz
2023
R5.28
Will Mallory
Tight End
Indianapolis Colts
recruited under Mark Richt
2023
R7.29
DJ Ivey
Cornerback
Cincinnati Bengals
recruited under Mark Richt
A pick counts toward his tenure when the player’s final college season was one he coached, a checkable rule rather than a claim about who developed the player. A blank note means the player is on a verified roster and arrived on his watch. “Estimated” means no roster record, so the final season is assumed to be the year before the draft.
News
Stories about him
Headlines, grouped by what they are about. Each is the outlet’s own.
Mario Cristobal moved Miami from Power Program II to Power Program I in 5 seasons.
+4.1 pts over 5 seasons · top 16% of 3-5-season tenures (717 in sample)
6th-best Miami tenure of 20 by the numbers.
Followed Manny Diaz (2019–2021).
System Shift, on arrival
swipe to see every season
Season
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Trend
Record & result
Record
5-7
7-6
10-3
13-3
8-0
Postseason
—
L bowl
L bowl
Title game L
—
Coordinators
OC
Josh Gattis
Shannon Dawson
Shannon Dawson
Shannon Dawson
Shannon Dawson
DC
Kevin Steele / Charlie Strong
Lance Guidry
Derek Nicholson / Lance Guidry
Corey Hetherman
Corey Hetherman
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense
24
69
98
89
100
Defense
45
53
45
94
55
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%
50.5
45.0
54.4
41.4
41.0
Red-zone pass%
41.6
44.1
51.2
38.1
33.0
4th-down go%opp. territory
41.5
33.3
31.0
40.5
53.3
Recruiter or developer?
Performs about as expected for his recruiting talent, on both sides of the ball.
Offense vs. talent
+5.8 pts
#84 of 208 · middle half
Defense vs. talent
-3.7 pts
#119 of 208 · middle half
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Who they bring in
Typical size for position, once adjusted for position mix.
Recruits older, more experienced transfers than most.
Avg. size (raw)
6′2″, 243 lbs
across 56 of 70 arrivals — unadjusted for position mix
Size vs. position-typical
+4.6 lbs
#114 of 255 · middle half
Avg. class year
Jr
#19 of 255 · top quarter
Avg. portal rating
3.4★
rated arrivals only
Top states: FL (18), GA (7), CA (5), TX (4), MS (2)
On3’s modeled estimate (social reach / exposure), not money actually paid — shown per player, never totaled.
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
66.6
position-weighted
Talent lost
61.2
position-weighted
Net
+5.4
arrivals minus departures
Best addition: Carson Beck (QB) from Georgia
Biggest loss: Jake Garcia (QB) to Missouri
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.
Does the system survive a coordinator change?
OC: Josh Gattis → Shannon Dawson · 2023
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
1st-down pass rate: 50.5% → 45.0% (-5.5 pts)
Confound, shown not hidden: only 66% of offensive production returned the year the coordinator changed — the roster turned over at the same time, not just the play-caller.
DC: Kevin Steele / Charlie Strong (co) → Lance Guidry · 2023
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
1-season window either side — numbers shown, not enough to badge a verdict.
Where the roster comes from, by position
Grows Edge from high school
76%
#172 of 208 stints
Grows Tackle from high school
91%
#196 of 223 stints
Postseason detail2023: Lost to Rutgers 24-31 Bad Boy Mowers Pinstripe Bowl2024: Lost to Iowa State 41-42 Pop-Tarts Bowl2025: Beat Texas A&M 10-3 College Football Playoff First Round Game2025: Beat Ohio State 24-14 College Football Playoff Quarterfinal at the Goodyear Cotton Bowl Classic2025: Beat Ole Miss 31-27 College Football Playoff Semifinal at the Vrbo Fiesta Bowl2025: Lost to Indiana 21-27 College Football Playoff National Championship Presented by AT&T
Mario Cristobal inherited Oregon at Power Program I and kept it there.
−3.3 pts over 4 seasons · bottom 47% of 3-5-season tenures (717 in sample)
5th-best Oregon tenure of 16 by the numbers.
Followed Willie Taggart (2017) · succeeded by Dan Lanning (2022–now).
System Shift, on arrival
System Shift, on departure
swipe to see every season
Season
2018
2019
2020
2021
Trend
Record & result
Record
9-4
12-2
4-3
10-3
Postseason
W bowl
W bowl
L bowl
—
Coordinators
OC
Marcus Arroyo
Marcus Arroyo
Joe Moorhead
Joe Moorhead
DC
Jim Leavitt
Andy Avalos
Andy Avalos
Joe Salave'a / Ken Wilson / Tim DeRuyter
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense
59
77
79
82
Defense
68
94
44
23
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%
34.5
39.5
41.6
41.0
Red-zone pass%
37.0
36.9
37.7
33.6
4th-down go%opp. territory
45.5
40.0
20.0
37.8
Recruiter or developer?
Performs about as expected for his recruiting talent, on both sides of the ball.
Offense vs. talent
+11.1 pts
#61 of 208 · middle half
Defense vs. talent
-4.2 pts
#121 of 208 · middle half
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Roster construction · portal era
Barely touches the portal — recruits and develops his own.
Portal arrivals
0
Portal departures
12
left via the portal
Net portal flow
-12
#185 of 187 FBS stints
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
0.0
position-weighted
Talent lost
35.9
position-weighted
Net
-35.9
arrivals minus departures
Biggest loss: Cale Millen (QB) to Northern Arizona
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.
Where the roster comes from, by position
Grows Tight end from high school
100%
#164 of 188 stints
Grows Edge from high school
100%
#191 of 208 stints
Postseason detail2018: Beat Michigan State 7-6 Bowl2019: Beat Wisconsin 28-27 Rose Bowl Game Presented By Northwestern Mutual2020: Lost to Iowa State 17-34 PlayStation Fiesta Bowl