Playoff odds0.1% → <0.1%CFB Zeitgeist forecast, before and after
Win and he’s at 12%. Lose and he’s at 19%.
No game this week · vs. California, Sat Nov 14, time to be announced · CALCalifornia is 3-6 · First meeting between Elliott and Tosh Lupoi as head coaches · Virginia’s chance to win: 79% (the site’s model)
If Virginia wins: 12%, 32nd of 132
Now: 14%
If Virginia loses: 19%, 23rd of 132
His chance of being out after the season, now and after Saturday. Each tick is an FBS head coach’s number today; ranks are against today’s field. From the site’s hot-seat model.
Is he getting fired?
14%chance he’s out after the season · 27th of 132 FBS head coaches · Warm
Dark line: his number after each game; a small dot just before a game is where it stood at kickoff, after other results moved it. Gray: where it could go, 8 seasons in 10 (darker, the middle half). The hollow dot: had his last game gone the other way. From the site’s hot-seat model.
If he finishes…
Bar: how likely that finish isNumber: his chance of being out
4-823%
5-715%
6-610%
7-56%
Why his number is where it is
Our hot-seat model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, and his contract (a bigger buyout, relative to pay, makes a change costlier). Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches with 3+ games this season.
Now hotter than at this point in 2025.
His hot seat, week by week
The chance he’s out by the end of that season, as it stood after every week of his tenure here, by today’s model.
← swipe for earlier seasons
Earlier seasons price the games left with power ratings rebuilt after those seasons ended.
What drives his number
The biggest factors, each against the typical FBS job today.
▲ Hotter
Year 5· tenure, which this model overrates(why?)
Tenure is one of this model’s strongest inputs, but its weight was set when retirements like Nick Saban’s and Bob Stoops’ still counted as being pushed out, so it overstates how much tenure matters.
▲ Hotter
$11.2M buyout (USA Today estimate) · 2.5× his pay, a multiple below average in FBS — cheap to move on
▲ Hotter
4-5, outscoring opponents by 25
What happened to coaches like him, 2004–2025
A different comparison: past coaches, not today’s, grouped by one fact at a time. Neither line knows the games he has left or his contract, so they can sit above or below his chance.
Were 4-5 after 9 games
10% pushed out over results · of 415 coaches
Were in years 5-9, after 9 games
13% pushed out over results · of 695 coaches
The outcome
Pushed out over results — a firing, forced resignation, mutual parting or non-renewal, each read case by case. Leaving for a better job, or retiring on his own terms, doesn’t count.
Buyout
$11,175,000USA Today estimate (Oct. 2025) — not a disclosed figure· 2.5× total pay· a small buyout, which raises his chance of being let go· without it: 9.5%
How good is this number? Checked on every FBS coach from 2010 to 2025, with its percentages calibrated each season on earlier years only: they track what happened — coaches it put near 25% were out about a quarter of the time — and a version pricing the games left with the previous season’s ratings ranked jobs as well as the ranking this page used before. Each week it learns from coaches who were still on the job at that point, so a firing during the season counts. In the Boiling zone it has run a few points high. Every job, and the method.
Econ 3010 Why is intermediate micro the hardest shit ever💔💔💔am I genuinely just not capable of applying these concepts like I thought I was a decent problem solver
AMST2660 spiritual, but not religious or AMST3630 Vietnam War in literature film? Any have any feedback?
I drove down to WS for to watch my first game at that stadium, unfortunately I did not get to see a game. All Virginia did was get off the bus and suit up........nothing else
Fan mood · last 3 weeks · more negative than 3 in 4 FBS fan bases
Offense: 88th of 138 per play. Defense: 50th.
Through 9 games. Each tick is an FBS team, adjusted for opponent strength (CFB Zeitgeist model); the dot is Virginia. The other two rows are where Virginia stands furthest from the middle. Early-season numbers move a lot.
3 games left
Sat Nov 14vs. CALCalifornia (3-6)79%
Sat Nov 21vs. UNCNorth Carolina (4-4)44%
Sat Nov 28at VTVirginia Tech (6-2)36%
Percent: Virginia’s chance to win, from the site’s model. Records are through today. Networks as announced; the rest are set closer to kickoff.
How the season got here
Where Virginia stood among 138 FBS programs by stature after each game (1st is the highest; the CFB Zeitgeist ledger).
Sep 28–Oct 4L 7-38 at FSUFlorida State9 headlines · 48th of 138
Sep 21–27 · rebuiltW 42-3 vs. DELDelaware6 headlines · 55th of 138
Each week as this page showed it at the time. Weeks marked rebuilt came before this page existed: they were built afterward from only what was known by the end of that week.
Our poach model, on his record so far, the win chances for every game he has left, his program, his pay and his background. Ranked against the 132 FBS head coaches this season. The zone words describe the market’s interest; none of them says he is leaving.
What drives his number
The biggest factors in his profile, each against the typical FBS head coach today. The games he has left are priced into the number, not listed here.
▲ Higher
Age 46 · neither at his alma mater nor in the state he was born in
▲ Higher
His 5th season at Virginia
How good is this number? It ranks a head coach who leaves for another head-coaching job ahead of one who stays 78 to 82% of the time, and its average came within a point of the share who actually left. What it can’t do
Tested on every FBS head coach from 2012 through 2025, each season scored by a model fit only on the seasons before it. From three games on, given one coach who left for a head-coaching job elsewhere or an NFL coordinator job and one who stayed, it ranked the one who left ahead 79 to 82% of the time; in a season’s first two games, 78%. Its average chance came within a point of the share who actually left. It counts a move a coach makes while he still holds the job; when his school ends it, that doesn’t count, even if another school then hires him.
The live number prices the games he has left with the power model’s ratings from this season. The test priced them with each team’s rating from the season before, because ratings made during past seasons were not kept, so this live version could not be replayed.
Programs new to FBS have no FBS record before this season in the data it reads, so their coaches are scored without one.
It is frozen: it learns nothing from 2026 until a deliberate refit.
A coach hired in December needs his background (age, alma mater, the state he was born in) added before his first game, or he shows as not rated.
Report card
Defense carries it: 53rd percentile defense, below the median offense at 44th.
Virginia, every completed season graded against the whole field, then averaged.
Each season is his team’s percentile among every team with that stat (the share it beat), averaged over his completed seasons here; a mid-season takeover year and the season in progress aren’t graded. Letters: A+ 90th percentile and up, A 80, B+ 70, B 60, B− 50, C+ 45, C 40, C− 30, D 15, F below.
Fans
Fan chatter
Oct 31L 7-51 at Wake ForestTime to clean house on the coaching staff. Bye week. Time to fire Kitchens and Elliott.UVAVirginia fan
Oct 23L 16-19 vs. DukeDoes Tony Elliott or Des Kitching just not allow Beau to run? I’ve never seen him run outside of designed QB runsUVAVirginia fan
Oct 10W 28-25 vs. SyracuseTo everyone that thought Tony Elliott had turned the corner last year, a very hearty "I told you so".UVAVirginia fan
Earlier weeks
Oct 3L 7-38 at Florida StateReminder that Tony Elliott got a 4 year extension in the offseasonUVAVirginia fan
Sep 19L 27-38 vs. West VirginiaI have made a complete 180 on Tony Elliott over the past two years, but Des Kitchings has to go. The man is wholly unqualified as an offensive play caller.UVAVirginia fan
Aug 29W 34-8 vs. NC StateRudzinski was the only coach Elliott hired that gave me hope.UVAVirginia fan
Several stories about him this week
Bye week. Next: California, Sat Nov 14
73rd of 104 FBS head coaches · from a few outlets and r/CFB
Gold: stories about him each day. W and L: his games.
Gold: stories we tracked each season, drawn on a square-root scale so a quiet year still shows. Hatched: before we started tracking (2025). Earlier years had thinner coverage, so compare within a stop, not across decades.
Stories are headlines grouped by what they are about, counted through Nov 4.
Stats
Big games
The big-game ledger
How he does in the games that matter most — rivalry record, performance broken out by real opponent tier, one-score games, and his toughest historical matchup.
1-2 against his rivals. Just 1-2 against Dave Doeren.
’23 L’25 L · blew a 10-pt lead’26 W · wire to wire
covered the spread
33% win rate across a real, 3-meeting series — short of the bar this site uses before badging a series “Nemesis.” Shown here as the toughest matchup on record, not an algorithmic crown.
Performance by opponent class
Blue Blood
0-1 0.0%ATS —
Power Program
4-8 33.3%ATS 9-3 12 of 12
National Program
10-18 35.7%ATS 10-17-1 28 of 28
Regional Program
7-4 63.6%ATS 7-4 11 of 11
ATS is his record against the spread: did his team beat the closing betting line, winning by more than it or losing by less? Lines start in 2013; a dash means fewer than 6 of those games had one. One-score games carry no spread record: a big favorite that wins a close game has almost always failed to cover, so that number would say nothing about the coach.
Signature games
3-8 vs. AP top 25 · 2-2 vs. the top 10
Every AP-ranked regular-season opponent, by rank (#1 at top) and year
’22’23’24’25’26
win loss · higher = higher-ranked opponent · dashed line = top 10
Signature wins
WVT
Virginia Tech · 2025
27-7
RivalQuality opponent
WUN
North Carolina · 2023
31-27
UpsetQuality opponent
WMI
Missouri · 2025
13-7
UpsetQuality opponentBowl/CFP stakes
Signature losses
LVT
Virginia Tech · 2023
17-55
Rival
LVT
Virginia Tech · 2024
17-37
Rival
LPI
Pittsburgh · 2022
7-37
Tags describe each game; they aren’t scores. The weighting that picks these games is still being tested.
Passed more than the situation called for under Kitchings.
3,307 run and pass snaps at Virginia, 2022–2025, his own games, one row per offensive coordinator. Each cell is how much more often he passed than the rest of FBS did in the same situation (field zone, down, distance, score, quarter, same season), in percentage points.
passed moreran morewithin noise (95% range includes 0)
Pass rate, stint by stint
Where each stint’s offense sat between run-first and pass-first, and how far it moved from one season to the next, against the FBS-wide average of 41% pass. The band is that stint’s real season-to-season range, not a fixed-width box.
Pass rate — share of offensive plays that were pass attemptsfirst covered seasonmost recent covered seasonfull season-to-season range (3+ covered seasons)
How much that is, against every other stint
Season-to-season pass-rate range for all 449 FBS coaching stints with at least three covered seasons, 2004–2025.
Typical stint7.010.3 median14.8middle half of all stints
Virginia9.0pt#267 of 449 · a typical amount
Building the roster
Five numbers on how he actually stocks a roster, from signing day to draft day.
His 4 ranked Virginia classes of his own have averaged #80 nationally — best #58, worst #111.
2022
#66
Transition
2023
#64
His class
2024
#88
His class
2025
#58
His class
2026
#111
His class
His class — he had the full signing cycleTransition — he was hired mid-cycle
Rank is each signing class’s national recruiting rank (#1 is best). Only a class he had a full signing cycle to build counts as his; inherited and mid-transition classes still show here, faded, but stay out of the average.
Roster ownership
Roster ownership
100%His own players
of his 2026 roster arrived on his watch — 120 of 120 players. Nobody is left from before he was hired.
Of his own players on this roster, 28% came through the transfer portal; the rest are non-portal arrivals (high-school signees, JUCO transfers, walk-ons).
New players each season, 2022–2026
32% of his 254 new players since 2022 came through the portal (FBS programs, same seasons: 23%). His share was 11% in 2022 and 51% in 2026.
Graded on the players who arrived and the players who left together, his portal seasons came out better than most FBS programs’ in 3 of the 5 seasons graded. our read
20227 of 64Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
20237 of 42Portal grade: about typical for FBS that season
202411 of 41Portal grade: better than most — #14 of 134 FBS programs that season
202530 of 56Portal grade: better than most — #6 of 136 FBS programs that season
202626 of 51Portal grade: better than most — #19 of 136 FBS programs that season
Came through the portalNon-portal arrivalsFBS-wide share that season
Each player counts once, in the season he arrived. 2021, the first season of portal tracking here, is left off because its arrival records look incomplete (about 31 new players per FBS team, against 52 in 2022). Portal grade: the site’s position-value-weighted scoring (the same engine as the Portal Heat feed and the “Who won the portal” grade): the value of the players who came in minus the value of the ones who left, ranked against every FBS program’s grade that same season. A season with fewer than 4 transfers in and out is not graded.
“His own” means the player arrived while he was head coach; “inherited” means a predecessor brought him in.
Size up front
Size up front
−2 lbAgainst the FBS average
Offensive linemen on his Virginia rosters have averaged within a few pounds of the FBS average (2022–2026). In the three seasons before he arrived, Virginia’s line averaged within a few pounds of the FBS average.
Virginia2022–2026−2 lb
−10FBS avg+10lb
His seasonsSame program, the seasons before he arrivedMiddle half of FBS coaching runs since 2010
Average listed weight of every offensive lineman on each season’s roster, holdovers included, against every FBS roster that season (2010 on; a program needs 3+ seasons under him to appear). Weights are the ones programs publish, and programs list differently. This describes size only — not scheme, and not quality.
Where he recruits
VATop state
is his biggest recruiting state: 25 of 88 signees (28%) across his 2022–2026 tenure, drawn from 22 states in all. Next: GA (14).
Where his signees came from, 2022–2026 (88 high-school, JUCO and prep signees)
45% of his signees come from VA and its 6 border states (NC 6, TN 4, MD 3, DC 1, KY 1).
Off this map: 4 signees to the west (CA 3, UT).
By region
South
71
Northeast
7
Midwest
6
West
4
Roster distance from campus (Scott Stadium, VA)
median hometown distance
319 mi
within 100 mi
27%
within 500 mi
73%
beyond 1,000 mi
6%
112 of 120 roster players with a known hometown (93% coverage)
The map counts signed recruits across his tenure; the distance figures cover his current roster, transfers and walk-ons included. Two different groups, kept separate on purpose.
The NFL pipeline
The NFL pipeline
3Drafted
players drafted into the NFL off his teams here. Most were someone else’s recruits: 2 arrived under Bronco Mendenhall; 1 he brought in himself.
His recruits 1Inherited 23 roster-verified · 0 estimated
Most recent picks first
Year
Pick
Player
Pos
NFL team
Note
2025
R3.29
Jonas Sanker
Safety
New Orleans Saints
recruited under Bronco Mendenhall
2024
R6.08
Malik Washington
Wide Receiver
Miami Dolphins
2023
R5.25
Dontayvion Wicks
Wide Receiver
Green Bay Packers
recruited under Bronco Mendenhall
A pick counts toward his tenure when the player’s final college season was one he coached, a checkable rule rather than a claim about who developed the player. A blank note means the player is on a verified roster and arrived on his watch. “Estimated” means no roster record, so the final season is assumed to be the year before the draft.
News
Stories about him
Headlines, grouped by what they are about. Each is the outlet’s own.
There was conversation about it, but with the challenges that they were posing and the things that were happening, we were trying to figure out how to fix it
It really gives us the ability to cover both edges, and … do some of our zone read stuff and get on the perimeter and let the backs get the ball in space. It's critical to what we do.
I'd say the passing game is probably the last component that we're going to get to from a development standpoint because [Beebe] showed immediately that he can play running back and be a really good one
Tony Elliott held Virginia at National Program III for 5 seasons.
−2.1 pts over 5 seasons · top 44% of 3-5-season tenures (717 in sample)
7th-best Virginia tenure of 16 by the numbers.
Followed Bronco Mendenhall (2016–2021).
System Shift, on arrival
swipe to see every season
Season
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Trend
Record & result
Record
3-7
3-9
5-7
11-3
4-5
Postseason
—
—
—
W bowl
—
Coordinators
OC
Desmond Kitchings
Desmond Kitchings
Desmond Kitchings
Desmond Kitchings
Desmond Kitchings
DC
John Rudzinski
John Rudzinski
John Rudzinski
John Rudzinski
John Rudzinski
Outcome — opponent-adjusted efficiency percentile
Offense
6
38
20
31
39
Defense
71
33
20
91
45
Tendencies — play-by-play, neutral script
1st-down pass%
52.6
49.8
51.3
51.8
44.1
Red-zone pass%
40.5
39.6
41.7
31.2
25.3
4th-down go%opp. territory
29.7
34.2
43.2
44.4
56.0
Recruiter or developer?
Underperforms his recruiting talent on offense and performs about as expected for his recruiting talent on defense.
Offense vs. talent
-27.2 pts
#196 of 208 · bottom quarter
Defense vs. talent
+2.4 pts
#87 of 208 · middle half
Recruiting talent is team-wide (no offense/defense split exists in the source data) -- both sides are scored against the same talent input, only the outcome is side-specific.
Who they bring in
Brings in bigger-than-position-typical players than most.
A typical class-year mix of incoming transfers.
Avg. size (raw)
6′2″, 238 lbs
across 82 of 93 arrivals — unadjusted for position mix
Size vs. position-typical
+6.8 lbs
#55 of 255 · top quarter
Avg. class year
Jr
#91 of 255 · middle half
Avg. portal rating
3.1★
rated arrivals only
Top states: VA (10), GA (9), NC (9), FL (7), TX (5)
Notable portal arrivals with a modeled NIL value
Beau Pribula On3 modeled · $1,500,000
On3’s modeled estimate (social reach / exposure), not money actually paid — shown per player, never totaled.
Who won the portal our read
Talent added
59.2
position-weighted
Talent lost
61.3
position-weighted
Net
-2.1
arrivals minus departures
Best addition: Beau Pribula (QB) from Missouri
Biggest loss: Brennan Armstrong (QB) to NC State
Position-value-weighted (QB/CB weighted highest, depth-decayed within each position) — the same scoring engine as the Portal Heat feed, not a separate grade.