CFB Zeitgeist Score
61
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 78th percentile.
Darrell Gill Jr.
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
506 REC YDS · 32 REC · 5 REC TD
Where He Ended Up · Transfer
Transferred to Ole Miss
WR · SYRACUSE · ACC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
61
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 78th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#468
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2023–2025Up 743% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Syracuse -> Ole Miss | 4-star | 0.9400 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
50
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
15.8
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#75 of 531 All FBS WRs at 15.8 yards per reception (32 catches).
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=32 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 3 vs Colgate — 152 ypr
Result W 66-24
The week the volume broke through — put up 152 yds vs Colgate.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 506): needs 97/game over remaining 2.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 506): needs 247/game over remaining 2.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 32): needs 14/game over remaining 2.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 32): needs 24/game over remaining 2.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 5): needs 1.5/game over remaining 2.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 5): needs 2.5/game over remaining 2.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Darrell Gill Jr.'s story is about how role and output meet each other. For Syracuse, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Big-play receiver against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 11 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 26-45@ Tennessee | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 0 | 26 | |
| Wk 2 | W 27-20vs UConn | 4 | 84 | 21.0 | 0 | 40 | |
| Wk 3 | W 66-24vs Colgate | 6 | 152 | 25.3 | 2 | 43 | Season-high 152 yds |
| Wk 4 | W 34-21@ Clemson | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 1 | 22 | |
| Wk 5 | L 3-38vs Duke | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 0 | 18 | |
| Wk 6 | L 18-31@ SMU | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 | |
| Wk 8 | L 13-30vs Pittsburgh | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 1 | 11 | |
| Wk 9 | L 16-41@ Georgia Tech | 5 | 79 | 15.8 | 1 | 34 | |
| Wk 10 | L 10-27vs North Carolina | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 | |
| Wk 11 | L 10-38@ Miami | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 12 | |
| Wk 13 | L 7-70@ Notre Dame | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 0 | 14 | |
| Total | 32 | 506 | 13.9 | 5 | 43 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 32 | #255/1110 | 77th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 506 | #217/1107 | 80th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 5 | #96/1111 | 91st pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 15.8 | #218/1106 | 80th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 15.1% | #240/1137 | 79th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Carries | 1 | #264/407 | 35th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 1 | #334/346 | 4th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 1 | #317/397 | 20th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 1.0 | #309/393 | 22nd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 0 | #81/411 | 81st pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 43 | #385/1105 | 65th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 13.1% | #93/1137 | 92nd pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 12.2% | #122/1137 | 89th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 8.2% | #199/1137 | 83rd pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 7.8% | #241/1137 | 79th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 7.3% | #216/1137 | 81st pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 5.7% | #310/1137 | 73rd pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.3% | #332/1137 | 71st pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 0 | #1/302 | 100th pct | Turnoversvs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 11 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home5g | 3.4 | 58.6 | 13.7 | 0.6 |
| Road6g | 2.5 | 35.5 | 14.1 | 0.3 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins3g | 4.0 | 92.3 | 22.3 | 1.0 |
| Losses8g | 2.5 | 28.6 | 10.8 | 0.2 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 2.8 | 57.0 | 17.6 | 0.5 |
| Weeks 8+5g | 3.0 | 32.8 | 9.4 | 0.4 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Elite: yards / catch (82nd). Strength: fumbles lost (80th). Concern: rush yards (20th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Stretches the field vertically. Every snap is a potential big play.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Samson Nacua’s 2021 season.
Samson Nacua
Chris Parker
Umari Hatcher
Jaedon Wilson
Ramel Keyton
Matches Samson on
Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Brennan Eagles’s path through Texas.
Brennan Eagles
C.J. Yarbrough
Reginald Virgil
Malik Knowles
Ted Hurst
Matches Brennan on
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Jaedon Wilson's junior season at Arkansas (2023).
Jaedon Wilson
Ayden Greene
Chas Nimrod
Chris Parker
Marlion Jackson
Matches Jaedon on
Differs from Jaedon on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Fran Brown
Pass share
48.6%
408 pass / 432 run
Plays / game
70.0
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
9.2%
379 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2023–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Nunzio Campanile → Fran Brown. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.