CFB Zeitgeist
JAJackson Arnold

Jackson Arnold

Three programs in three seasons for a player rated the No. 8 prospect in the 2023 class is not the career arc anyone drew up on signing day. But the play-by-play data on Jackson Arnold tells a more interesting story than the box score: the legs are genuinely elite, and the arm just hasn't come along for the ride yet. Dan Mullen and UNLV are the next chapter.

QB · Auburn · Cl 3 · #11

CFB Zeitgeist 48transferred_college

Three programs in three seasons for a player rated the No. 8 prospect in the 2023 class is not the career arc anyone drew up on signing day. But the play-by-play data on Jackson Arnold tells a more interesting story than the box score: the legs are genuinely elite, and the arm just hasn't come along for the ride yet. Dan Mullen and UNLV are the next chapter.

Arnold's Auburn tape in 2025 is a study in contradictions. His 94th-percentile interception rate says he's disciplined — only nine QBs in the country were more careful with the football on a per-attempt basis. His 89th-percentile EPA per carry says he punishes defenses with his legs, finishing runs (81st-percentile rushing TD rate) and occasionally breaking one (75th-percentile explosive run rate). Those are legitimately NFL-caliber rushing numbers for a quarterback.

The passing game is a different reel. A 16th-percentile EPA per dropback, an 11th-percentile explosive pass rate, and a 2nd-percentile sack rate — meaning he was getting sacked on over 12% of dropbacks, dead last in the country — paint a picture of a passer who hasn't found comfort in a pro-style pocket. The Auburn offensive system wasn't kind to him, but the numbers were hard enough that he lost the starting job.

Now he lands at UNLV under Dan Mullen, who has one of the better track records in the sport of building mobile quarterbacks into complete starters. If Mullen can simplify Arnold's reads, widen the run-pass option menu, and rebuild his pocket confidence in a lighter Mountain West schedule, 2026 could be the season Arnold finally matches his recruiting pedigree. The talent is there. The question is whether the right system has finally found him.

PLAY STYLE

Arnold is a runner who happens to also throw. His 89th-percentile EPA per carry and 81st-percentile rushing TD rate are not flukes — he picks his lanes quickly and he finishes. The 94th-percentile interception rate signals real processing; he knows when to pull it down. What he hasn't solved is the drop-back game: his explosive pass rate sits at the 11th percentile, his EPA per dropback at the 16th, and his sack rate was the second worst in the country (2nd percentile) — nearly one in eight dropbacks ended with him on the ground. The profile is less dual-threat QB than it is a running back with a live arm waiting for a system that believes in him.

Career Arc

HS
Recruit
★★★★★
#8 national
CFB
College
2 teams
2023–2025
NFL
NFL Draft
Not drafted (yet)

Coaching Lineage · 2023–2025

1 coach
2023
Hugh Freeze
Auburn
2024
Hugh Freeze
Auburn
2025
Hugh Freeze
Auburn

Played his entire career under Hugh Freeze.

Where He Ended Up · Transfer

Transferred to UNLV

2025Auburn
2026UNLV

2025 snapshot

Season context · Team result + system

2023Oklahoma10-3HC: Brent Venables · Balanced
2024Oklahoma6-7HC: Brent Venables · Run-leaning
2025Auburn5-7HC: Hugh Freeze · Run-leaning

Savant · Box-rate percentiles

Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort

48Mid-pack
8 metrics · season cumulative

Elite: interceptions (92nd). Strength: rush tds (81st). Concern: yards / att (16th).

Interceptions#8 / 183 · 92nd pct
2pass
Rush TDs#31 / 183 · 81st pct
8rush
Rush yards#52 / 183 · 72nd pct
311rush
Fumbles lost#32 / 174 · 66th pct
1fumb
Completion %#78 / 183 · 57th pct
63.3%pass
Pass yards#126 / 183 · 31st pct
1309pass
Pass TDs#140 / 183 · 22nd pct
6pass
Yards / att#150 / 183 · 16th pct
6.1pass

Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.

Career stats

Passing

Season-by-season quarterback passing line in a familiar scoreboard layout.

Season Team CMPATTCMP%YDSY/ATDINTRATELNGSACK
2025 AuburnFinal snapshot 13621563.3%1,3096.162121.7----
2024 OklahomaFinal snapshot 15424662.6%1,4215.8123124.8----
2023 OklahomaFinal snapshot 446963.8%5638.243142.7----
Career 3 loaded seasonsCareer row reflects the stat seasons currently loaded in this database. 33453063.0%3,2936.2228125.9----

Rushing

Ground contribution that rounds out the quarterback profile.

Season Team CARYDSAVGTDLNG
2025 AuburnFinal snapshot 1123112.88--
2024 OklahomaFinal snapshot 1504443.03--
2023 OklahomaFinal snapshot 311163.71--
Career 3 loaded seasonsCareer row reflects the stat seasons currently loaded in this database. 2938713.012--

Signature game

SIGNATURE GAME · Week 13 · 2025

W 62–17

vs Mercer

31 yds · 0 TD · 0 INT  ·  QBR 67.6  ·  53 rush yds (3 car) · 1 TD

Dominant 45-point win at home against Mercer.

Game log

Game Log · Week-by-week

2025 season · 10 games

Box score · CFBD
WkOppCMP/ATTYDSTDINTYPAQBRNote
Wk 1W 38-24@ Baylor11/17108006.493.7
Wk 2W 42-3vs Ball State24/28251309.070.2Season-high 251 yds
Wk 3W 31-15vs South Alabama13/24142105.986.0
Wk 4L 17-24@ Oklahoma21/32220106.971.5
Wk 5L 10-16@ Texas A&M18/33125003.835.1
Wk 7L 10-20vs Georgia19/31137004.452.2
Wk 8L 17-23vs Missouri18/30207016.941.5
Wk 9W 33-24@ Arkansas7/1273116.114.3
Wk 10L 3-10vs Kentucky2/315005.03.0
Wk 13W 62-17vs Mercer3/531006.267.6
Total136/2151309626.153.5

How he plays

Savant · Box-rate percentiles

Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort

48Mid-pack
8 metrics · season cumulative

Elite: interceptions (92nd). Strength: rush tds (81st). Concern: yards / att (16th).

Interceptions#8 / 183 · 92nd pct
2pass
Rush TDs#31 / 183 · 81st pct
8rush
Rush yards#52 / 183 · 72nd pct
311rush
Fumbles lost#32 / 174 · 66th pct
1fumb
Completion %#78 / 183 · 57th pct
63.3%pass
Pass yards#126 / 183 · 31st pct
1309pass
Pass TDs#140 / 183 · 22nd pct
6pass
Yards / att#150 / 183 · 16th pct
6.1pass

Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.

PLAY STYLE

Arnold is a runner who happens to also throw. His 89th-percentile EPA per carry and 81st-percentile rushing TD rate are not flukes — he picks his lanes quickly and he finishes. The 94th-percentile interception rate signals real processing; he knows when to pull it down. What he hasn't solved is the drop-back game: his explosive pass rate sits at the 11th percentile, his EPA per dropback at the 16th, and his sack rate was the second worst in the country (2nd percentile) — nearly one in eight dropbacks ended with him on the ground. The profile is less dual-threat QB than it is a running back with a live arm waiting for a system that believes in him.

Perception vs tape

Three programs in three seasons for a player rated the No. 8 prospect in the 2023 class is not the career arc anyone drew up on signing day. But the play-by-play data on Jackson Arnold tells a more interesting story than the box score: the legs are genuinely elite, and the arm just hasn't come along for the ride yet. Dan Mullen and UNLV are the next chapter.

Arnold's Auburn tape in 2025 is a study in contradictions. His 94th-percentile interception rate says he's disciplined — only nine QBs in the country were more careful with the football on a per-attempt basis. His 89th-percentile EPA per carry says he punishes defenses with his legs, finishing runs (81st-percentile rushing TD rate) and occasionally breaking one (75th-percentile explosive run rate). Those are legitimately NFL-caliber rushing numbers for a quarterback.

The passing game is a different reel. A 16th-percentile EPA per dropback, an 11th-percentile explosive pass rate, and a 2nd-percentile sack rate — meaning he was getting sacked on over 12% of dropbacks, dead last in the country — paint a picture of a passer who hasn't found comfort in a pro-style pocket. The Auburn offensive system wasn't kind to him, but the numbers were hard enough that he lost the starting job.

Now he lands at UNLV under Dan Mullen, who has one of the better track records in the sport of building mobile quarterbacks into complete starters. If Mullen can simplify Arnold's reads, widen the run-pass option menu, and rebuild his pocket confidence in a lighter Mountain West schedule, 2026 could be the season Arnold finally matches his recruiting pedigree. The talent is there. The question is whether the right system has finally found him.

How he plays

Arnold is a runner who happens to also throw. His 89th-percentile EPA per carry and 81st-percentile rushing TD rate are not flukes — he picks his lanes quickly and he finishes. The 94th-percentile interception rate signals real processing; he knows when to pull it down. What he hasn't solved is the drop-back game: his explosive pass rate sits at the 11th percentile, his EPA per dropback at the 16th, and his sack rate was the second worst in the country (2nd percentile) — nearly one in eight dropbacks ended with him on the ground. The profile is less dual-threat QB than it is a running back with a live arm waiting for a system that believes in him.

2026 outlook · as of 2026-06-16

DNA match

Player DNA

The Scrambler

Makes plays with feet when the pocket collapses. Efficiency still on the rise.

QB

His 2025 production profile sits closest to Tanner Mordecai’s 2023 season.

Tanner Mordecai

69%match

Wisconsin · 2023

#2

Jackson Arnold

Oklahoma · 2024

65%
#3

Broc Lowry

Western Michigan · 2025

All-MAC
64%
#4

Brett Gabbert

Miami (OH) · 2022

62%
#5

Adrian Martinez

Kansas State · 2022

61%

Matches Tanner on

Completion %
Total pass EPA (college ability)
Height

Differs from Tanner on

Recruiting rating (higher)
Rush usage (higher)

Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Parker McKinney’s path through Eastern Kentucky.

Parker McKinney

96%match

Eastern Kentucky · 2023

#2

Trenton Bourguet

Arizona State · 2023

86%
#3

Luke Anthony

Louisiana Tech · 2020

84%
#4

Chase Garbers

California · 2021

82%
#5

Tony Muskett

Virginia · 2024

81%

Matches Parker on

Yards per attempt
Completion %

As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Broc Lowry's junior season at Western Michigan (2025).

Broc Lowry

63%match

Western Michigan · 2025

All-MAC
#2

Adrian Martinez

Kansas State · 2022

58%
#3

Brett Gabbert

Miami (OH) · 2022

All-MAC
57%
#4

Bishop Davenport

South Alabama · 2025

57%
#5

Sam Leavitt

Arizona State · 2025

All-Big 12
54%

Differs from Broc on

Recruiting rating (higher)
Class year (higher)
Rush usage (lower)

Peer comparator

Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match

Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile

3 peers · 8 metrics
Jackson ArnoldAuburnAvery JohnsonKansas State· 72% simNick VattiatoMiddle Tennessee· 67% simCade KlubnikClemson· 66% sim
Interceptions
92
Arnold
56
Johnson
44
Vattiato
56
Klubnik
Rush TDs
81
Arnold
81
Johnson
39
Vattiato
59
Klubnik
Rush yards
72
Arnold
80
Johnson
27
Vattiato
42
Klubnik
Fumbles lost
66
Arnold
66
Johnson
66
Vattiato
66
Klubnik
Completion %
57
Arnold
33
Johnson
41
Vattiato
73
Klubnik
Pass yards
31
Arnold
61
Johnson
57
Vattiato
78
Klubnik
Pass TDs
22
Arnold
72
Johnson
64
Vattiato
64
Klubnik
Yards / att
16
Arnold
46
Johnson
13
Vattiato
63
Klubnik

Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.

Development

Development Trajectory · passing yards

2023–2025
5632023
1,4212024
1,3092025

+133%

Up 133% from first season to most-recent.