CFB Zeitgeist Score
51
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by completion % at the 58th percentile.
Mark Gronowski
Mark Gronowski arrives at Iowa with a new fit to prove and an old chapter behind him.
RUSHING VALUE · WEPA
+0.47
via your WEPA model · 2025 · 109 plays
AI narrative · updated 2026-06-22 · compiled from CFB Zeitgeist data
2026 Outlook
Returning to Iowa for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Quarterback · Iowa
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Iowa · Last season: 9-4 · Talent rank #42 · 2026 recruiting class #38
QB · IOWA · BIG TEN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
51
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by completion % at the 58th percentile.
Heisman Heat
Awaiting
Not on the live Heisman board this week.
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
—
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | South Dakota State -> Iowa | 3-star | 0.8700 | Immediate |
Where the model places this player relative to the rest of the Heisman field.
Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
Today’s Hot-Take
+0.470 qb rushing weighted-epa — #3 in a 46-QB cohort, 96th percentile in the modern era.
Anti-Take
EFFICIENCYEfficiency rewards selectivity. Volume-adjusted rank in the same cohort almost always looks looser — call it elite, not unique.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
100
Grounded Optimism
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
Only 1 rival mention(s) — below the 4-mention floor for a defensible read.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
+0.470
EPA
P4 + Notre Dame QBs, min 50 carries
Why it matters
#3 of 46 P4 + Notre Dame QBs among scrambling QBs by rushing weighted-EPA — +0.470 EPA per run on 109 carries.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=109 cohort 46
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The unusual part of Mark Gronowski's case is that the production comes in two channels, not one. For Iowa, he has 1,741 passing yards and 10 touchdown passes, but he also adds 545 rushing yards and 16 rushing scores. That kind of dual-threat load tends to create a more resilient Heisman case because the offense can tilt the game in multiple ways.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Steady volume | Dual-threat against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 34-7vs UAlbany | 8/15 | 44 | 1 | 0 | 2.9 | 24.5 | Season-high 212 yds |
| Wk 2 | L 13-16@ Iowa State | 13/24 | 83 | 0 | 1 | 3.5 | 29.2 | |
| Wk 3 | W 47-7vs Massachusetts | 16/24 | 179 | 2 | 0 | 7.5 | 70.3 | |
| Wk 4 | W 38-28@ Rutgers | 12/18 | 186 | 0 | 0 | 10.3 | 70.5 | |
| Wk 5 | L 15-20vs Indiana | 19/25 | 144 | 0 | 1 | 5.8 | 54.7 | |
| Wk 7 | W 37-0@ Wisconsin | 17/24 | 107 | 0 | 1 | 4.5 | 36.7 | |
| Wk 8 | W 25-24vs Penn State | 10/16 | 68 | 0 | 1 | 4.3 | 84.2 | |
| Wk 9 | W 41-3vs Minnesota | 12/19 | 135 | 1 | 0 | 7.1 | 70.5 | |
| Wk 11 | L 16-18vs Oregon | 10/18 | 138 | 1 | 0 | 7.7 | 88.3 | |
| Wk 12 | L 21-26@ USC | 12/19 | 132 | 1 | 1 | 6.9 | 68.7 | |
| Wk 13 | W 20-17vs Michigan State | 12/22 | 147 | 1 | 1 | 6.7 | 39.0 | |
| Wk 14 | W 40-16@ Nebraska | 9/16 | 166 | 1 | 0 | 10.4 | 93.2 | |
| Bowl | W 34-27@ Vanderbilt | 16/22 | 212 | 2 | 1 | 9.6 | 79.5 | |
| Total | 166/262 | 1741 | 10 | 7 | 6.7 | 62.3 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Iowa | 166 | 262 | 63.4% | 1,741 | 6.6 | 10 | 7 | 126.4 | -- | -- |
| Career | 1 loaded season | 166 | 262 | 63.4% | 1,741 | 6.6 | 10 | 7 | 126.4 | -- | -- |
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Iowa | 130 | 545 | 4.2 | 16 | -- |
| Career | 1 loaded season | 130 | 545 | 4.2 | 16 | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 1,741 | #105/382 | 73rd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 10 | #105/407 | 74th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 166 | #97/383 | 75th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 63.4% | #155/383 | 60th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 6.6 | #223/382 | 42nd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 545 | #29/408 | 93rd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.24 | #118/200 | 42nd pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 260 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 47.3% | #101/428 | 77th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 262 | #98/407 | 76th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 7 | #316/407 | 23rd pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 130 | #30/408 | 93rd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 67 | #13/391 | 97th pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 16 | #3/408 | 100th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 4.2 | #132/407 | 68th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 90.0% | #60/428 | 86th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 75.5% | #17/428 | 96th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 57.2% | #117/428 | 73rd pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 43.7% | #84/428 | 81st pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 42.5% | #129/428 | 70th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 37.0% | #124/428 | 71st pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 22.1% | #51/428 | 88th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Value | Rushing WEPA | +0.47 | #3/140 | 99th pct | Opponent-adjusted rushing value | 109 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 1 | #69/258 | 74th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 122 | 0.9 | 6.0 | 0.4 |
| Road6g | 148 | 0.7 | 7.5 | 0.7 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins9g | 138 | 0.9 | 7.0 | 0.4 |
| Losses4g | 124 | 0.5 | 6.0 | 0.8 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 136 | 0.7 | 6.3 | 0.6 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 131 | 0.8 | 7.2 | 0.5 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: rush tds (98th). Strength: rush yards (84th). Concern: yards / att (27th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Pass Profile · Completion depth (PBP)
Where the throws are landing
Short
0–9 ydsMiddle
10–19 ydsDeep
20+ ydsOverall 64.8% completion on 142 attempts · 11 deep completions averaging 25.9 yds.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2025
Concerns: EPA / dropback.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Makes plays with feet when the pocket collapses. Efficiency still on the rise.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Chase Garbers’s 2021 season.
Chase Garbers
Anthony Brown
Jalen Mayden
Kyron Drones
Brendan Sorsby
Matches Chase on
Differs from Chase on
Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Ashton Daniels’s path through Auburn.
Ashton Daniels
Cam Fancher
Tony Muskett
Tristan Gebbia
Derek Robertson
Matches Ashton on
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Jalen Mayden's junior season at San Diego State (2023).
Jalen Mayden
Aidan Chiles
Brendan Sorsby
Tai Lavatai
Billy Edwards
Matches Jalen on
Differs from Jalen on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Kirk Ferentz
Pass share
36.6%
286 pass / 495 run
Plays / game
60.1
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
7.9%
228 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-heavy, slow tempo.
Coaching Lineage · 2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Kirk Ferentz.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This player hasn’t appeared on a Heisman ballot tracked by the model. | |||||||||
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Iowa | Big Ten | QB | 4 | No. 11 | 6-2 | 235 lb | Naperville, IL |