Player stats
No player stats logged for this program yet — stats appear once the season is underway.
Biggest plays from Utah Tech’s games
Official highlights with our numbers: the plays that moved the chance to win most in Utah Tech’s games this season, whoever made them.
Q1, 14:54 · Utah Tech tiedTherrian Alexander intercepts CJ TillerUtah Tech at BYU, week 1Q1, 14:54 · Utah Tech 0, BYU 07Utah Tech’s turnover led to a touchdown7Utah Tech’s turnover led to a touchdownUtah Tech’s turnover led to a touchdownC.Tiller pass intercepted by T.Alexander at UTU32, End Of Play▶Watch from this play
Q1, 13:05 · BYU tiedLegend Glasker runs 9 yards for a touchdownUtah Tech at BYU, week 1Q1, 13:05 · BYU 7, Utah Tech 0BYU opened the scoringBYU opened the scoringL.Glasker rush left for 9 yards gain to the UTU00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick good▶Watch from this play
Q1, 3:53 · BYU up 7Bear Bachmeier finds Jojo Phillips for a 5-yard touchdownUtah Tech at BYU, week 1Q1, 3:53 · BYU 14, Utah Tech 0Jojo Phillips's first touchdown since 2024Jojo Phillips's first touchdown since 2024B.Bachmeier pass complete short left to J.Phillips caught at UTU04, for 5 yards to the UTU00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick good▶Watch from this play
Q1, 0:31 · Utah Tech down 14C. Tiller fumbles and BYU recoversUtah Tech at BYU, week 1Q1, 0:31 · Utah Tech 0, BYU 147Utah Tech’s turnover led to a touchdown7Utah Tech’s turnover led to a touchdownUtah Tech’s turnover led to a touchdownC.Tiller rush middle for 6 yards loss to the UTU30 fumbled by C.Tiller at UTU30 recovered by BYU T.Akana at UTU30, End Of Play▶Watch from this play
Q2, 14:53 · BYU up 14Bear Bachmeier finds Legend Glasker for a 26-yard touchdownUtah Tech at BYU, week 1Q2, 14:53 · BYU 21, Utah Tech 021-0score after the play21-0score after the playB.Bachmeier pass complete short left to L.Glasker caught at UTU28, for 26 yards to the UTU00 touchdown, 1ST DOWN, kick good▶Watch from this play
Q2, 13:41 · Utah Tech down 21Evan Johnson intercepts CJ TillerUtah Tech at BYU, week 1Q2, 13:41 · Utah Tech 0, BYU 217Utah Tech’s turnover led to a touchdown7Utah Tech’s turnover led to a touchdownUtah Tech’s turnover led to a touchdownC.Tiller pass intercepted by E.Johnson at BYU35, End Of Play▶Watch from this play
How scary each game got
Utah Tech lost to Idaho State after being 91% to win; the closest win was at Cal Poly, down to 17%
Tap a game for its score and win chances.
Each bar runs from the lowest to the highest chance our model gave Utah Tech during that game; the thick mark is where it started. Numbers are the game week.
Home-field advantage · 2018–present · FBS opponents
Utah Tech is worth +9.8 points more at home than on the road.
Top tenth of FBS, 99th percentile of 133 programs
0% at home, 0% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (0-3 home, 0-8 away). Interval ±8.7.
The stadium and how the home edge is measured
Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge. The books use about 3. Per-team versions were tested and did not hold up (why). Against the closing line, Utah Tech has beaten the number by +6.3 more at home than away over 32 games. That is inside the ±10.6 that many games can resolve, so the results cannot tell this stadium from the flat number. That is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.
Greater Zion Stadium seats 10,500 and has averaged 40% full (4,210, 16 games reported). Visitors cover a median 848 miles to get here (2018-present).
Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 31 home games since 2018. No national trip rank shown: the ranked field is FBS venues only and leaves out the service academies and venues with too few measured games.
More in this tab
Scheme claims
How much of Utah Tech’s number is the schedule?
Raw EPA/play through week 10 is 0.03; adjusted for opponent strength, it's 0.01. The widest gap came in week 2: −0.23 raw vs. −0.04 adjusted.