Antonio Smith
The receipt: 1 tackles against Bowling Green — Week 8, 2023.
Low coverage — composed from the verified record.
How it ended
One season at Akron, 2 sacks — drafted at #135 overall by Arizona.
Career Arc
Where He Ended Up · NFL
ArizonaEntering 23rd NFL season
2023 snapshot
Season context · Team result + system
Where this defender ranks vs the field
Box-score production percentiles vs the position cohort
Concern: tackles (0th).
Percentiles are versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score production. There are no play-by-play efficiency bars here: CFBD's play-value model credits offensive players only, so no defensive EPA exists to rank.
Splits & context
Splits · Per-game
2023 season · 5 games
Home vs Road
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home1g | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Road4g | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
First half vs Second half
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-74g | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Weeks 8+1g | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Joe Moorhead
Awards
Player standing · 2023
On the two-deep and pushing for snaps.
Career stats
| Season | Team | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Akron | 3 | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | -- | -- | -- |
| Career | 3 | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | -- | -- | -- |
Game log
Game Log · Week-by-week
2023 season · 5 games
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 3 | L 3-35@ Kentucky | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 4 | L 27-29@ Indiana | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | Season-high 1 tackles |
| Wk 5 | L 10-13vs Buffalo | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 7 | L 10-17@ Central Michigan | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 8 | L 14-41@ Bowling Green | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | — | 0 |
How he plays
Where this defender ranks vs the field
Box-score production percentiles vs the position cohort
Concern: tackles (0th).
Percentiles are versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score production. There are no play-by-play efficiency bars here: CFBD's play-value model credits offensive players only, so no defensive EPA exists to rank.