CFB Zeitgeist Score
86
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by sacks at the 100th percentile.
David Bailey
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
51 TACKLES · 14.5 SACKS
Where He Ended Up · NFL
New York2026 NFL rookie season
LB · TEXAS TECH · BIG 12
CFB Zeitgeist Score
86
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by sacks at the 100th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#9046
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP LB AWARD
Butkus
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 1 · 2-deepRotational. Earning real snaps in the rotation.
Career arc · Season-by-season Standing
4 seasons on the ladder
2022
Stanford · LB
—
2023
Stanford · LB
—
2024
Stanford · LB
—
2025
Texas Tech · LB
R14 · Unanimous All-American
Elite
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4-star | 0.9718 | No. 66 recruit | HighSchool | Stanford |
| 2020 | 2-star | 0.7956 | No. 3023 recruit | HighSchool |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Named Consensus All-American — recognized on 3+ of the 5 NCAA-recognized selector lists.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★☆
to Stanford
Composite
0.9718
#66 national
NFL Draft
2026 · Rd 1, Pick 2
#2 overall · New York
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Awaiting signal
The Room reads fan conversation around a player — who’s talking, what they believe, and how that shifts. It publishes once weekly volume rebuilds; for most players that’s in-season, when game-week chatter spikes.
Cohort divergence reads how different fanbases talk about this player. Returns once weekly mentions clear the publish floor.
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
Signature Story
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the defensive totals stand
✓ Hit 6-sack season · finished with 14.5.
✓ Hit 10-sack season · finished with 14.5.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
David Bailey is trying to climb the steepest award hill in college football: a defensive candidacy. The hook is the disruption profile on Texas Tech's defense, with 14.5 sacks, 19.5 tackles for loss, and -- interceptions through the current loaded season. For a defender, the question is never just production; it is whether elite disruption and team context can become nationally undeniable.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
High-disruption defender | High-volume tackler against FBS defenders.
2025 season snapshot | final
Tackling & Disruption
Coverage & Takeaways
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 14 games
| Wk | Opp | TKL | SOLO | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 67-7vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff | 2 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | Season-high 9 tackles |
| Wk 2 | W 62-14vs Kent State | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 3 | W 45-14vs Oregon State | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 4 | W 34-10@ Utah | 3 | 3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 6 | W 35-11@ Houston | 3 | 3 | 3.0 | 2.0 | — | 0 | 2 sacks |
| Wk 7 | W 42-17vs Kansas | 6 | 3 | 3.0 | 3.0 | — | 0 | 3 sacks |
| Wk 8 | L 22-26@ Arizona State | 5 | 3 | 3.0 | 2.0 | — | 0 | 2 sacks |
| Wk 9 | W 42-0vs Oklahoma State | 3 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 10 | W 43-20@ Kansas State | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 11 | W 29-7vs BYU | 4 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | — | 1 | |
| Wk 12 | W 48-9vs UCF | 3 | 2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 14 | W 49-0@ West Virginia | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | 0 | |
| Wk 15 | W 34-7vs BYU | 5 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.0 | — | 0 | |
| Bowl | L 0-23vs Oregon | 9 | 5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | — | 2 | |
| Total | 51 | 32 | 19.5 | 14.5 | — | 3 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Texas Tech | 51 | 32 | 19.5 | 14.5 | 3 | -- | -- |
| 2024 | Stanford | 31 | 22 | 8.0 | 6.0 | -- | -- | -- |
| 2023 | Stanford | 31 | 19 | 6.0 | 5.0 | -- | -- | -- |
| 2022 | Stanford | 43 | 28 | 7.5 | 1.5 | -- | -- | -- |
| Career | 4 loaded seasons | 156 | 101 | 41.0 | 27.0 | 3 | -- | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
TFL, sacks, and QB hurries are grouped together because defensive Heisman cases are usually built on visible havoc, not on tackle counts alone.
Pass breakups, interceptions, and forced fumbles matter because national awards voters respond to plays that change possessions and highlight reels.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defense | Total tackles | 51 | #579/4942 | 88th pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | TFL | 19.5 | #2/4972 | 100th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Sacks | 14.5 | #1/4972 | 100th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Pass breakups | 3 | #521/2184 | 76th pct | Coveragevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | QB hurries | 10 | #19/1878 | 99th pct | Disruptionvs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Solo tackles | 32 | #448/4584 | 90th pct | Volumevs FBS DEF |
| Defense | Fumbles recovered | 1 | #103/736 | 86th pct | Takeawaysvs FBS DEF |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 0 | #1/773 | 100th pct | Turnoversvs FBS DEF |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
UNANIMOUS AA
UNANIMOUS AA · Rung 14 of 16
Why he’s here
Unanimous All-American — 1st team on all five NCAA-recognized selectors.
What moves him up
The only step up is a Player-of-the-Year invite.
What moves him down
Losing a selector drops this to Consensus.
Accolade streams
Named Consensus All-American — recognized on 3+ of the 5 NCAA-recognized selector lists.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 14 games
Home vs Road
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home9g | 3.9 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| Road5g | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.0 |
Win vs Loss
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins12g | 3.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| Losses2g | 7.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
First half vs Second half
| TKL/g | TFL/g | SACK/g | PD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 3.7 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.3 |
| Weeks 8+7g | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the LB cohort
Elite: sacks (99th). Strength: tackles for loss (99th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · LB · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Downhill striker who fills the run lane and blitzes off the edge.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Trey Moore’s 2023 season.
Trey Moore
Andrew Chatfield Jr.
Colin Simmons
PJ Ramsey
Harvey Dyson III
Matches Trey on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a senior, his production profile tracks closest to Nadame Tucker's senior season at Western Michigan (2025).
Nadame Tucker
Jimmori Robinson
Malachi Lawrence
Gabe Jacas
Josaiah Stewart
Matches Nadame on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Joey McGuire
Pass share
47.6%
484 pass / 532 run
Plays / game
72.6
14 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
6.5%
336 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2022–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Joey McGuire.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-AMERICA · CONSENSUS
Consensus AA (2025)
11 first-team selectors
ALL-CONFERENCE · 1ST TEAM
All-Conf 1st team (2025)
All-Big 12
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
National selector recognition is one of the strongest non-Heisman signals on a player card and should sit near the top of the showcase.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All-Big 12 | all_conference | Texas Tech | Big 12 | DE |
| 2025 | All-Big 12 | all_conference | Texas Tech | Big 12 | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (WCFF) | all_america | WCFF | LB |
| 2025 | All-America (USA Today) | all_america | USA Today | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (SI) | all_america | SI | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (PFF) | all_america | PFF | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (ESPN) | all_america | ESPN | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (CBS) | all_america | CBS | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (The Athletic) | all_america | The Athletic | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (SN) | all_america | SN | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (FWAA) | all_america | FWAA | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (AP) | all_america | AP | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (AFCA) | all_america | AFCA | DL |
| 2025 | All-America (Consensus) | all_america | Texas Tech | Consensus | -- |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Texas Tech | Big 12 | LB | 4 | No. 31 | 6-3 | 250 lb | Irvine, CA |
| 2024 | Stanford | ACC | LB | 4 | No. 31 | 6-3 | 250 lb | Irvine, CA |
| 2023 | Stanford | Pac-12 | LB | 4 | No. 31 | 6-3 | 250 lb | Irvine, CA |
| 2022 | Stanford | Pac-12 | LB | 4 | No. 31 | 6-3 | 250 lb | Irvine, CA |