CFB Zeitgeist Score
76
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 83rd percentile.
Luke Altmyer
sonnet prose (cached)
3,007 PASS YDS · 22 PASS TD · 242 RUSH YDS
2026 Outlook
Returning to Illinois for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Returning starter
Quarterback · Illinois · editorial
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
Illinois · Last season: 9-4 (AP #23) · Talent rank #64 · 2026 recruiting class #45
QB · ILLINOIS · BIG TEN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
76
All-Conference in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 83rd percentile.
Heisman Heat
#18
1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
1%
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 3 · RecognizedNational watch / fringe All-America. Knocking on the All-America door.
Career arc · Season-by-season Standing
5 seasons on the ladder
2021
Ole Miss · QB
—
2022
Ole Miss · QB
—
2023
Illinois · QB
—
2024
Illinois · QB
R08 · Watch-list name
Recognized
2025
Illinois · QB
R09 · All-Conference HM / 2nd team
Recognized
Development Trajectory · passing yards
2021–2025Up 1466% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4-star | 0.9219 | No. 196 recruit | HighSchool | Ole Miss |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Ole Miss -> Illinois | 4-star | 0.9000 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★☆
to Ole Miss
Composite
0.9219
#196 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Season 2025 conversation window
Belief Meter
54
Quietly Bullish
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
Only 1 rival mention(s) — below the 4-mention floor for a defensible read.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
+0.440
EPA
P4 + Notre Dame QBs, min 250 dropbacks
Why it matters
#10 of 58 P4 + Notre Dame QBs by weighted EPA per dropback (min 250 dropbacks) — +0.440 EPA/play.
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=378 cohort 58
Signature Moment
Week 10 vs Rutgers — 88 ypc
Result W 35-13
The week the volume broke through — put up 88 yds vs Rutgers.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
✓ Hit 3,000-yard season · finished with 3,007.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The unusual part of Luke Altmyer's case is that the production comes in two channels, not one. For Illinois, he has 3,007 passing yards and 22 touchdown passes, but he also adds 242 rushing yards and 5 rushing scores. That kind of dual-threat load tends to create a more resilient Heisman case because the offense can tilt the game in multiple ways.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
High-volume passer | Efficient | Dual-threat against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 52-3vs Western Illinois | 17/21 | 217 | 3 | 0 | 10.3 | 89.7 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 2 | W 45-19@ Duke | 22/31 | 296 | 3 | 0 | 9.5 | 85.9 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 3 | W 38-0vs Western Michigan | 17/26 | 196 | 2 | 0 | 7.5 | 51.1 | |
| Wk 4 | L 10-63@ Indiana | 14/22 | 146 | 1 | 0 | 6.6 | 42.9 | |
| Wk 5 | W 34-32vs USC | 20/26 | 328 | 2 | 0 | 12.6 | 97.5 | Clean 2-TD game |
| Wk 6 | W 43-27@ Purdue | 19/22 | 390 | 1 | 0 | 17.7 | 90.9 | Season-high 390 yds |
| Wk 7 | L 16-34vs Ohio State | 30/44 | 248 | 1 | 1 | 5.6 | 64.4 | |
| Wk 9 | L 25-42@ Washington | 22/34 | 199 | 2 | 2 | 5.9 | 83.5 | |
| Wk 10 | W 35-13vs Rutgers | 19/31 | 235 | 4 | 1 | 7.6 | 88.9 | 4 TD passes |
| Wk 12 | W 24-6vs Maryland | 15/25 | 172 | 2 | 1 | 6.9 | 80.5 | |
| Wk 13 | L 10-27@ Wisconsin | 21/35 | 248 | 0 | 0 | 7.1 | 66.0 | |
| Wk 14 | W 20-13vs Northwestern | 10/15 | 136 | 0 | 0 | 9.1 | 16.5 | |
| Bowl | W 30-28vs Tennessee | 20/33 | 196 | 1 | 0 | 5.9 | 69.9 | |
| Total | 246/365 | 3007 | 22 | 5 | 8.6 | 71.4 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 3,007 | #36/382 | 91st pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 22 | #35/407 | 92nd pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 246 | #40/383 | 90th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 67.4% | #87/383 | 78th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 8.2 | #80/382 | 79th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 242 | #75/408 | 82nd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.44 | #14/200 | 94th pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 378 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 53.3% | #52/428 | 88th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 365 | #46/407 | 89th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 5 | #276/407 | 32nd pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 100 | #51/408 | 88th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 36 | #86/391 | 78th pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 5 | #59/408 | 86th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 2.4 | #226/407 | 45th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 97.5% | #5/428 | 99th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 72.7% | #27/428 | 94th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 72.6% | #29/428 | 93rd pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 52.8% | #58/428 | 87th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 46.6% | #54/428 | 88th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 45.3% | #68/428 | 84th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 13.8% | #114/428 | 74th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Value | Rushing WEPA | +0.29 | #43/140 | 70th pct | Opponent-adjusted rushing value | 62 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 2 | #163/258 | 37th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
ALL-CONF HM
ALL-CONF HM · Rung 9 of 16
Why he’s here
All-Conference honorable mention / 2nd team — the recognition has started.
What moves him up
A best-at-position run lifts to 1st team.
What moves him down
A back-end conference finish drops out of the honor list.
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home8g | 216 | 1.9 | 8.2 | 0.4 |
| Road5g | 256 | 1.4 | 9.4 | 0.4 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins9g | 241 | 2.0 | 9.7 | 0.2 |
| Losses4g | 210 | 1.0 | 6.3 | 0.8 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-78g | 252 | 1.8 | 9.5 | 0.1 |
| Weeks 8+5g | 198 | 1.6 | 7.3 | 0.8 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: completion % (87th). Strength: yards / att (82nd).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Pass Profile · Completion depth (PBP)
Where the throws are landing
Short
0–9 ydsMiddle
10–19 ydsDeep
20+ ydsOverall 72.1% completion on 183 attempts · 24 deep completions averaging 37.5 yds.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2024
Elite: EPA / dropback.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
High-percentage passer who protects the ball. Loses the matchup on improvisation.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Brady Cook’s 2023 season.
Brady Cook
Max Duggan
Brennan Armstrong
Ty Simpson
Jaxson Dart
Matches Brady on
Differs from Brady on
Through 4 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Brady Cook’s path through Missouri.
Brady Cook
Kenny Pickett
Ian Book
Haynes King
Shane Buechele
Matches Brady on
As a graduate, his production profile tracks closest to Payton Thorne's graduate season at Auburn (2024).
Payton Thorne
Brady Cook
Behren Morton
Blake Shapen
Carson Beck
Matches Payton on
Differs from Payton on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Bret Bielema
Pass share
45.6%
372 pass / 444 run
Plays / game
62.8
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
11.0%
292 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-leaning.
Coaching Lineage · 2021–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Bret Bielema.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-CONFERENCE
All-Conf mention (2025)
All-Big Ten
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All-Big Ten | all_conference | Big Ten | -- |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Illinois | QB4 | #18 | #23 | 1.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | Big Ten |
| 2023 | Illinois | QB4 | #162 | #291 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Big Ten |
| 2022 | Ole Miss | QB4 | #416 | #348 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | SEC |
| 2021 | Ole Miss | QB4 | #403 | #256 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | SEC |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Illinois | Big Ten | QB | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 205 lb | Starkville, MS |
| 2024 | Illinois | Big Ten | QB | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 205 lb | Starkville, MS |
| 2023 | Illinois | Big Ten | QB | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 205 lb | Starkville, MS |
| 2022 | Ole Miss | SEC | QB | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 205 lb | Starkville, MS |
| 2021 | Ole Miss | SEC | QB | 4 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 205 lb | Starkville, MS |