CFB Zeitgeist Score
59
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 68th percentile.
Nitro Tuggle
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
505 REC YDS · 34 REC · 4 REC TD
Where He Ended Up · Transfer
Transferred to South Carolina
WR · PURDUE · BIG TEN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
59
Solid starter in the position cohort. Carried by rec tds at the 68th percentile.
Heisman Heat
#1178
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterStarter. A locked-in starting role.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2024–2025Up 1385% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-star | 0.9510 | No. 102 recruit | HighSchool | Georgia |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Purdue -> South Carolina | 3-star | 0.8700 | Immediate |
| 2025 | Georgia -> Purdue | 3-star | 0.8700 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★☆
to Georgia
Composite
0.9510
#102 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
—
Awaiting per-cohort signal
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
14.9
yds
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#109 of 531 All FBS WRs at 14.9 yards per reception (34 catches).
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=34 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 14 vs Indiana — 80 ypr
Result L 3-56
The week the volume broke through — put up 80 yds vs Indiana.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 505): needs 195/game over remaining 1.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 505): needs 495/game over remaining 1.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 34): needs 26/game over remaining 1.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 34): needs 46/game over remaining 1.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 4): needs 4/game over remaining 1.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 4): needs 6/game over remaining 1.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Nitro Tuggle's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Purdue, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Receiving weapon against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 12 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 31-0vs Ball State | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 0 | 19 | |
| Wk 2 | W 34-17vs Southern Illinois | 1 | 29 | 29.0 | 1 | 29 | |
| Wk 3 | L 17-33vs USC | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 1 | 33 | |
| Wk 4 | L 30-56@ Notre Dame | 3 | 66 | 22.0 | 1 | 31 | |
| Wk 6 | L 27-43vs Illinois | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 0 | 27 | |
| Wk 7 | L 20-27@ Minnesota | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 0 | 27 | |
| Wk 8 | L 0-19@ Northwestern | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Wk 9 | L 24-27vs Rutgers | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 1 | 14 | |
| Wk 10 | L 16-21@ Michigan | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 0 | 16 | |
| Wk 11 | L 10-34vs Ohio State | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 8 | |
| Wk 12 | L 13-49@ Washington | 3 | 57 | 19.0 | 0 | 36 | |
| Wk 14 | L 3-56vs Indiana | 5 | 80 | 16.0 | 0 | 23 | Season-high 80 yds |
| Total | 34 | 505 | 15.2 | 4 | 36 |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 34 | #240/1110 | 78th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 505 | #220/1107 | 80th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 4 | #152/1111 | 86th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 14.9 | #272/1106 | 75th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 17.0% | #169/1137 | 85th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 36 | #512/1105 | 54th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 11.7% | #147/1137 | 87th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 10.2% | #106/1137 | 91st pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 10.1% | #216/1137 | 81st pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 9.1% | #136/1137 | 88th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 7.9% | #157/1137 | 86th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 7.3% | #216/1137 | 81st pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.0% | #391/1137 | 66th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 12 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 2.7 | 39.7 | 15.3 | 0.4 |
| Road5g | 3.0 | 45.4 | 15.2 | 0.2 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins2g | 2.0 | 30.5 | 19.9 | 0.5 |
| Losses10g | 3.0 | 44.4 | 14.3 | 0.3 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 2.7 | 47.8 | 19.1 | 0.5 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 3.0 | 36.3 | 11.3 | 0.2 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Concern: long catch (23rd).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Stretches the field vertically. Every snap is a potential big play.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Keontra Smith’s 2023 season.
Keontra Smith
Tim Jones
Cam Vaughn
Ayden Greene
Jalen Smith
Matches Keontra on
Differs from Keontra on
Through 1 college season, his career arc tracks closest to Jalen Coker’s path through Holy Cross.
Jalen Coker
Cameron Dorner
Tylan Wallace
Hudson Clement
Cary Angeline
Matches Jalen on
As a sophomore, his production profile tracks closest to Cam Vaughn's sophomore season at West Virginia (2025).
Cam Vaughn
Collin Dixon
AJ Wilson
Nyziah Hunter
Jeremiah McClellan
Matches Cam on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Barry Odom
Pass share
52.0%
404 pass / 373 run
Plays / game
64.8
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
4.9%
348 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2024–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Ryan Walters → Barry Odom. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Georgia | WR2 | #1178 | #1061 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | SEC |
Team, conference, and class by season.