CFB Zeitgeist Score
54
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 73rd percentile.
Parker Navarro
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
2,375 PASS YDS · 14 PASS TD · 886 RUSH YDS
In Portal · 2026
In transfer portal
QB · OHIO · MID-AMERICAN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
54
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by yards / att at the 73rd percentile.
Heisman Heat
#103
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Career arc · Season-by-season Standing
5 seasons on the ladder
2021
UCF · QB
—
2022
Ohio · QB
—
2023
Ohio · QB
—
2024
Ohio · QB
R09 · All-Conference HM / 2nd team
Recognized
2025
Ohio · QB
R09 · All-Conference HM / 2nd team
Recognized
Development Trajectory · passing yards
2021–2025Up 59275% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3-star | 0.8422 | No. 1448 recruit | HighSchool | UCF |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Ohio -> Professional | 3-star | 0.8700 | PendingAppeal |
| 2022 | UCF -> Ohio | 3-star | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to UCF
Composite
0.8422
#1448 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
0
Skeptical
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
Signature Story
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The unusual part of Parker Navarro's case is that the production comes in two channels, not one. For Ohio, he has 2,375 passing yards and 14 touchdown passes, but he also adds 886 rushing yards and 9 rushing scores. That kind of dual-threat load tends to create a more resilient Heisman case because the offense can tilt the game in multiple ways.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Steady volume | Dual-threat against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 31-34@ Rutgers | 21/31 | 239 | 3 | 0 | 7.7 | 93.8 | 3 TD passes |
| Wk 2 | W 17-10vs West Virginia | 22/31 | 247 | 1 | 3 | 8.0 | 48.3 | 3 INTs — rough day |
| Wk 3 | L 9-37@ Ohio State | 6/13 | 94 | 1 | 0 | 7.2 | 54.8 | |
| Wk 4 | W 52-35vs Gardner-Webb | 18/27 | 290 | 1 | 0 | 10.7 | 70.7 | |
| Wk 5 | W 35-20vs Bowling Green | 17/25 | 208 | 2 | 1 | 8.3 | 74.3 | |
| Wk 6 | L 14-20@ Ball State | 16/29 | 188 | 1 | 0 | 6.5 | 34.9 | |
| Wk 8 | W 48-21vs Northern Illinois | 17/23 | 205 | 0 | 1 | 8.9 | 86.0 | |
| Wk 9 | W 28-21@ Eastern Michigan | 23/28 | 315 | 2 | 2 | 11.3 | 50.9 | Season-high 315 yds |
| Wk 11 | W 24-20vs Miami (OH) | 16/31 | 201 | 1 | 1 | 6.5 | 48.6 | |
| Wk 12 | L 13-17@ Western Michigan | 8/19 | 70 | 0 | 1 | 3.7 | 33.1 | |
| Wk 13 | W 42-14vs Massachusetts | 3/8 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 3.5 | 21.4 | |
| Wk 14 | W 31-26@ Buffalo | 10/23 | 147 | 2 | 1 | 6.4 | 78.1 | |
| Bowl | W 17-10vs UNLV | 11/15 | 143 | 0 | 1 | 9.5 | 55.4 | |
| Total | 188/303 | 2375 | 14 | 11 | 7.6 | 57.7 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 2,375 | #73/382 | 81st pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 14 | #77/407 | 81st pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 188 | #84/383 | 78th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 62.0% | #182/383 | 53rd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 7.8 | #103/382 | 73rd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 886 | #9/408 | 98th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.29 | #87/200 | 57th pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 293 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 50.1% | #82/428 | 81st pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 303 | #81/407 | 80th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 11 | #386/407 | 5th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 161 | #14/408 | 97th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 44 | #56/391 | 86th pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 9 | #23/408 | 95th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 5.5 | #79/407 | 81st pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 96.7% | #10/428 | 98th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 64.3% | #84/428 | 81st pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 61.4% | #94/428 | 78th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 50.7% | #73/428 | 83rd pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 44.4% | #81/428 | 81st pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 43.8% | #79/428 | 82nd pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 22.9% | #45/428 | 90th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Value | Rushing WEPA | +0.28 | #51/140 | 64th pct | Opponent-adjusted rushing value | 125 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 5 | #252/258 | 3rd pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
ALL-CONF HM
ALL-CONF HM · Rung 9 of 16
Why he’s here
All-Conference honorable mention / 2nd team — the recognition has started.
What moves him up
A best-at-position run lifts to 1st team.
What moves him down
A back-end conference finish drops out of the honor list.
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home7g | 189 | 0.7 | 7.9 | 1.0 |
| Road6g | 176 | 1.5 | 7.1 | 0.7 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins9g | 198 | 1.0 | 8.1 | 1.1 |
| Losses4g | 148 | 1.2 | 6.3 | 0.2 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 201 | 1.3 | 8.3 | 0.7 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 161 | 0.8 | 6.7 | 1.0 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: rush yards (95th). Strength: rush tds (86th). Concern: fumbles lost (2nd).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Pass Profile · Completion depth (PBP)
Where the throws are landing
Short
0–9 ydsMiddle
10–19 ydsDeep
20+ ydsOverall 64.0% completion on 186 attempts · 20 deep completions averaging 31.2 yds.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2024
Reads as a mid-tier profile across the board..
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Makes plays with feet when the pocket collapses. Efficiency still on the rise.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Parker Navarro’s 2024 season.
Parker Navarro
Zevi Eckhaus
John Rhys Plumlee
Jake Retzlaff
Jalon Daniels
Matches Parker on
Through 3 college seasons, his career arc tracks closest to Jack Abraham’s path through Southern Miss.
Jack Abraham
Anthony Colandrea
Tyler Huff
Zac Thomas
Jalon Daniels
Matches Jack on
As a graduate, his production profile tracks closest to Zevi Eckhaus's graduate season at Washington State (2025).
Zevi Eckhaus
Kaidon Salter
Ta'Quan Roberson
Blake Shapen
Jalon Daniels
Matches Zevi on
Differs from Zevi on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Brian Smith
Pass share
36.6%
311 pass / 539 run
Plays / game
65.4
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
9.4%
278 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Run-heavy.
Coaching Lineage · 2021–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Tim Albin → Brian Smith. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-CONFERENCE
All-Conf mention (2025)
All-MAC
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All-MAC | all_conference | Ohio | MAC | QB |
| 2024 | All-MAC | all_conference | Ohio | MAC | QB |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Ohio | QB4 | #103 | #166 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | Mid-American |
| 2023 | Ohio | QB4 | #193 | #178 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Mid-American |
| 2022 | Ohio | QB4 | #1439 | #1213 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | Mid-American |
| 2021 | UCF | QB4 | #1121 | #997 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W20 snapshot | American Athletic |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Ohio | Mid-American | QB | 4 | No. 13 | 6-0 | 205 lb | Phoenix, AZ |
| 2024 | Ohio | Mid-American | QB | 4 | No. 13 | 6-0 | 205 lb | Phoenix, AZ |
| 2023 | Ohio | Mid-American | QB | 4 | No. 13 | 6-0 | 205 lb | Phoenix, AZ |
| 2022 | Ohio | Mid-American | QB | 4 | No. 13 | 6-0 | 205 lb | Phoenix, AZ |
| 2021 | UCF | American Athletic | QB | 4 | No. 13 | 6-0 | 205 lb | Phoenix, AZ |