Washington
2-0Coaches #24Big Ten · Jedd Fisch, year 3 (17-11) · Husky Stadium · 70,138 · 66,604 avg in 2026
LastW 16–14 vs Utah State · Sat Sep 12 · Alex McLaughlin 2 sacks, 2 TFL, 1 INT
Nextvs Eastern Washington · Sat Sep 19 · 7:15 pm ET · Husky Stadium · series 3-0, won the last 3 · Game preview
Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2
All 89 stats
FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs
| Player | # | G | Cmp/Att | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | INT | Rate | ZPR | QBR | Adj ANY/A | Sack% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.38 EPA/play | 1 | 2 | 50 / 76 | 65.8 | 517 #40 FBS | 6.8 | 1 | 0 | 127.3 | 54 | 50.7 | 6.7 | 2.6 | |
Yards by week → | ||||||||||||||
| Player | # | G | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.57 EPA/play | 8 | 2 | 7 | 116 | 16.6 | 0 | 35 | |
Yards by week → | ||||||||
| Possession Receiver · +0.04 EPA/play | 2 | 2 | 14 | 100 | 7.1 | 0 | 18 | |
Yards by week → Possession ReceiverReliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive. This week's matchup — WR Roebuck moves the chains on third down. Tracy is the one who moves the chains on third down. Season receipt Yards / reception7.9 bottom 11th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions EPA / play (adj)0.0 bottom 6th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions Trait fingerprint Plays like View Dezmen Roebuck's full player page | ||||||||
| Complete TE · +0.70 EPA/play | 85 | 2 | 8 | 70 | 8.8 | 0 | 19 | |
Yards by week → Complete TENo single go-to route — the receiving numbers show up inline and split out alike. 17 of 21 TEs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Yards / reception9.5 bottom 28th percentile · FBS TEs, min. 8 receptions Reception volume8 bottom 12th percentile · FBS TEs, min. 8 receptions Trait fingerprint Plays like View Baron Naone's full player page | ||||||||
| +0.19 EPA/play | 86 | 2 | 7 | 46 | 6.6 | 0 | 15 | |
Yards by week → | ||||||||
| Player | # | G | Tot | Solo | TFL | Sack | Hur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Player | # | G | Tot | Solo | Ast | TFL | Sack | PD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 48 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3 #30 FBS | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 91 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | # | G | Tot | PD | INT | TFL | Sack |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Nickel | 7 | 2 | 15 | 2 #43 FBS | 2 #5 FBS | 3 | 2 |
Hybrid NickelMoves between deep coverage and the slot — the modern positionless DB. 22 of 46 Ss we've classified this way this season. Season receipt PD rate13.3% 96th percentile · FBS safeties, min. 15 tackles Plays like View Alex McLaughlin's full player page | |||||||
| 6 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 1 #22 FBS | 0.5 | 0 | |
| 24 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1 #22 FBS | 0.5 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 #43 FBS | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Player | # | G | FG M/A | FG% | XP M/A | Pts | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | 2 | 4/6 | 66.7 | 4/4 | 16 | 48 |
| Player | # | G | No | Yds | Avg | Long | In20 | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | 2 | 10 | 445 | 44.5 | 64 | 4 | 1 |
Net average is unavailable — CFBD's punting feed carries gross yards only, with no return-yardage or touchback deduction.
| Player | # | G | No | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 7 | 0 | 27 |
2026 stat leaders · Washington
through 2 gamesAlex McLaughlin leads Washington with 15 tackles through 2 games.
Washington fields an elite offense behind an elite defense.
Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.
Washington reads strongest in success rate (top 7%) and rushing epa (top 7%); the crux lives in explosive plays, where Washington sits at the 48th percentile.
offense · strengths lead
defense · higher bar = harder to play against
hidden math · special situations
Home-field advantage · Washington · 2018–present · FBS opponents
Washington is worth +4.3 points more at home than on the road.
Middle of FBS, 56th percentile of 133 programs
79% at home, 54% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (37–10 home, 19–16 away). Interval ±3.5.
Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Washington has beaten the number by +3.9 more at home than away over 71 games — inside the ±6.3 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.
Husky Stadium seats 70,138 and has averaged 96% full (67,455, 28 games reported). Visitors face the 9th-longest trip of 135 FBS venues: a median 706 miles since 2018. The map isn't translating, though — the split above still reads middle of fbs. 23% of the 2026 roster (23 of 99 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.
Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 53 home games since 2018.
More in this tab
Scheme claims
Standard downs vs. passing downs
Does Washington hold up once the down-and-distance turns against them?
81st percentile success on standard downs, 4th on passing downs — a 77-point gap between the two.
View all FBS teams as a table
| Team | Standard-downs percentile | Passing-downs percentile |
|---|---|---|
| App State | 44th | 90th |
| Arizona | 92nd | 86th |
| Arkansas | 60th | 80th |
| Auburn | 75th | 55th |
| Ball State | 12th | 24th |
| Baylor | 40th | 96th |
| Boise State | 58th | 46th |
| Boston College | 27th | 56th |
| Buffalo | 7th | 14th |
| California | 9th | 25th |
| Central Michigan | 16th | 6th |
| Charlotte | 73rd | 83rd |
| Clemson | 1st | 19th |
| Coastal Carolina | 61st | 52nd |
| Colorado | 35th | 77th |
| Colorado State | 82nd | 91st |
| Delaware | 70th | 31st |
| Duke | 20th | 29th |
| Eastern Michigan | 52nd | 10th |
| Florida Atlantic | 43rd | 87th |
| Florida International | 46th | 43rd |
| Florida State | 28th | 65th |
| Georgia Southern | 24th | 45th |
| Georgia Tech | 58th | 44th |
| Hawai'i | 18th | 41st |
| Iowa State | 4th | 23rd |
| Jacksonville State | 65th | 82nd |
| Kansas | 70th | 35th |
| LSU | 33rd | 98th |
| Liberty | 14th | 59th |
| Louisiana | 19th | 92nd |
| Louisville | 96th | 70th |
| Memphis | 69th | 65th |
| Michigan | 2nd | 62nd |
| Michigan State | 62nd | 29th |
| Middle Tennessee | 87th | 68th |
| Missouri | 36th | 85th |
| Navy | 98th | 59th |
| Nevada | 77th | 52nd |
| New Mexico State | 45th | 75th |
| Norfolk State | 16th | 9th |
| North Dakota State | 86th | 27th |
| North Texas | 49th | 68th |
| Ohio | 38th | 17th |
| Ohio State | 90th | 40th |
| Oklahoma State | 41st | 49th |
| Ole Miss | 94th | 50th |
| Oregon | 35th | 33rd |
| Oregon State | 10th | 38th |
| Pittsburgh | 30th | 76th |
| Purdue | 83rd | 88th |
| Rutgers | 30th | 71st |
| Sacramento State | 23rd | 14th |
| Sam Houston | 78th | 61st |
| San Diego State | 4th | 40th |
| San José State | 54th | 22nd |
| South Alabama | 50th | 73rd |
| South Florida | 91st | 52nd |
| Stanford | 76th | 15th |
| Syracuse | 48th | 64th |
| TCU | 93rd | 8th |
| Tennessee | 65th | 78th |
| Texas | 72nd | 94th |
| Texas A&M | 85th | 72nd |
| Texas Tech | 88th | 48th |
| Troy | 22nd | 59th |
| Tulane | 31st | 2nd |
| Tulsa | 56th | 1st |
| UAB | 65th | 81st |
| UNLV | 51st | 7th |
| USC | 97th | 99th |
| UTSA | 99th | 29th |
| Utah State | 4th | 93rd |
| Vanderbilt | 80th | 12th |
| Wake Forest | 56th | 97th |
| Washington | 81st | 4th |
| Washington State | 8th | 3rd |
| Western Kentucky | 25th | 34th |
| Western Michigan | 39th | 20th |
| Wisconsin | 13th | 18th |
| Wyoming | 65th | 36th |
Halftime identity
Washington by half
1st-half offense ranks 12th percentile in FBS; 2nd-half, 40th — competitive snaps only, garbage time excluded from both halves.
Tendency drift
Season by season
How Washington’s current staff calls plays, year over year
Pass defense by zone
Pass-depth identity
What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.
On short throws (≤19 air yards), Washington’s passing game completes a completion rate above the FBS mean (70.1% vs 68.3% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 68-play sample) — mid-pack, 30 of 41 qualifying offenses.
We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.
Ratings
Comparable teams
Most similar programs · Washington
Reads like
Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.
Conditions
60°F average kickoff temp; 17% of games had measurable precipitation; 7 mph average wind.
Based on 82 home games with weather data.