Oregon State

0-2

Pac-12 · JaMarcus Shephard, year 1 (0-2) · Reser Stadium · 43,363 · 30,539 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#60 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #90 (-6.8) · FPI #85
The marketno line yetvs Montana · our model 66% Oregon State · a number, not a pick

LastL 24–35 vs Texas Tech · Sat Sep 12 · Jesse Legree 240 rec yds, 2 TD, 1 tackles

Nextvs Montana · Sat Sep 19 · 11 pm ET · Reser Stadium · series 12-2-2, lost the last 2 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
22.0
Pts allowed/game
34.0
Total yards/gm#55 / 138 · 61st pct
437.0
Rush yards/gm#138 / 138 · 1st pct
40.5
Pass yards/gm#7 / 138 · 95th pct
396.5
Yards allowed/gm#117 / 138 · 16th pct
442.5
Rush yds allowed/gm#115 / 138 · 17th pct
191.5
SacksT-#38 / 138 · 65th pct
5
InterceptionsT-#63 / 115 · 23rd pct
1
3rd-down conv#128 / 138 · 8th pct
26.7%
All 89 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
874437.0/gm6.07/play#55 / 138 · 61st pct#37 / 70 · 48th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
885442.5/gm6.06/play#117 / 138 · 16th pct#67 / 70 · 5th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
8140.5/gm0.56/play#138 / 138 · 1st pct#70 / 70 · 1st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
383191.5/gm2.62/play#115 / 138 · 17th pct#67 / 70 · 5th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
4422.0/gmT-#136 / 138 · 1st pct#69 / 70 · 2nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
8743.5/gmT-#121 / 138 · 12th pctT-#68 / 70 · 3rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
21.0/gmT-#106 / 138 · 18th pctT-#56 / 70 · 15th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#126 / 138 · 7th pctT-#68 / 70 · 3rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
793396.5/gm5.51/play#7 / 138 · 95th pct#4 / 70 · 95th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
502251.0/gm3.44/playT-#108 / 138 · 22nd pctT-#60 / 70 · 14th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
10050.0/gm#6 / 138 · 96th pct#1 / 70 · 99th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
5929.5/gmT-#66 / 138 · 52nd pctT-#37 / 70 · 47th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
6130.5/gmT-#5 / 138 · 96th pct#2 / 70 · 98th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4120.5/gmT-#95 / 138 · 29th pctT-#53 / 70 · 23rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
42.0/gmT-#48 / 138 · 57th pctT-#33 / 70 · 46th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
31.5/gmT-#75 / 138 · 36th pctT-#47 / 70 · 23rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating
Team
138.8138.8#69 / 115 · 40th pct#43 / 60 · 29th pct#4 / 13 · 77th pct
Opp
154.4154.4#79 / 91 · 14th pct#41 / 42 · 4th pct#10 / 13 · 31st pct
Interceptions thrown
Team
10.5/gmT-#52 / 138 · 49th pctT-#25 / 70 · 53rd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#24 / 138 · 64th pctT-#11 / 70 · 64th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
52.5/gmT-#38 / 138 · 65th pctT-#21 / 70 · 60th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#121 / 138 · 11th pctT-#65 / 70 · 6th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
94.5/gmT-#94 / 138 · 29th pctT-#52 / 70 · 22nd pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
84.0/gmT-#39 / 138 · 67th pctT-#26 / 70 · 56th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
4020.0/gmT-#86 / 138 · 36th pctT-#51 / 70 · 27th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4623.0/gmT-#114 / 138 · 16th pctT-#65 / 70 · 6th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
84.0/gmT-#104 / 138 · 21st pctT-#57 / 70 · 15th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
157.5/gmT-#120 / 138 · 12th pctT-#64 / 70 · 7th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
3015.0/gmT-#29 / 138 · 78th pctT-#11 / 70 · 84th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2914.5/gmT-#79 / 138 · 40th pctT-#41 / 70 · 39th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
31.5/gmT-#23 / 138 · 74th pctT-#12 / 70 · 72nd pct#11 / 13 · 23rd pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#71 / 138 · 37th pctT-#40 / 70 · 32nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down att
Team
84.0/gmT-#6 / 138 · 95th pctT-#2 / 70 · 96th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#20 / 138 · 74th pctT-#10 / 70 · 72nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
59:3529:48/gm#89 / 138 · 36th pct#47 / 70 · 34th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
60:2530:12/gm#80 / 138 · 42nd pct#47 / 70 · 34th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
Vertical Passer · +0.55 EPA/play2260 / 9960.6789
#4 FBS
8.03
#60 FBS
1135.55568.77.25.7
Pocket Passer · +0.15 EPA/play562 / 11753.0646
#14 FBS
5.53
#60 FBS
2104.4
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
Deep Threat · +1.84 EPA/play12213376
#1 FBS
28.93
#9 FBS
75
-0.07 EPA/play1268414043
+0.38 EPA/play728789.8018
+0.88 EPA/play967011.7122
+0.50 EPA/play8027578.1024
+0.29 EPA/play827456.4014

2026 stat leaders · Oregon State

through 2 games

Jesse Legree leads Oregon State with 376 receiving yards through 2 games.

1. Jesse Legree WR 376 receiving yards
2. Braden Atkinson QB 789 passing yards
3. Aiden Sullivan LB 19 tackles
4. Gabarri Johnson QB 646 passing yards
5. Takari Hickle LB 12 tackles
How They Play · 2025

Oregon State fields a struggling methodical, ball-control offense behind a leaky, gives up the big play defense.

Offense
11th pct EPA/play
Tempo
44th pct success, 1st explosiveness
Defense
39th pct EPA allowed
Defensive shape
3rd pct at limiting explosive plays

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Oregon State · 2025

Oregon State reads strongest in success rate allowed (top 26%) and rushing epa allowed (top 50%); the crux lives in explosive plays, where Oregon State sits at the 1st percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.05
11th
Success Rate +0.42
44th
Explosive Plays +1.09
1st
Rushing EPA -0.02
8th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.17
39th
Success Rate Allowed +0.38
75th
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.44
3rd
Passing EPA Allowed +0.30
31st

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.10
8th
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.07
50th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 12 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Oregon State · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Oregon State is worth +2.7 points more at home than on the road.

Bottom third of FBS, 25th percentile of 133 programs

48% at home, 29% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (21–23 home, 12–30 away). Interval ±3.8.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Oregon State has beaten the number by −0.9 more at home than away over 73 games — inside the ±6.4 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Reser Stadium seats 43,363 and has averaged 79% full (34,045, 27 games reported). Visitors cover a median 566 miles to get here since 2018 — 34th-longest of 135 FBS venues, inside the ordinary range. 13% of the 2026 roster (18 of 134 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 50 home games since 2018.

Home21–23Away12–30Edge+2.7 ±3.8Visitor trip566 mi

More in this tab

Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

Fourth-quarter reliability, corrected

Oregon State's 4th-quarter offense, before and after garbage time

Raw Q4 EPA/play ranks 47th percentile in FBS. Strip out snaps taken with a blowout margin and it climbs to the 58th — the correction is the finding, not a footnote.

league medianRaw 4th quarter · 47th pctileCompetitive snaps only · 58th pctileWorst in FBSBest in FBS
Source CFB Zeitgeist · CFBD play-by-play, garbage-time adjusted by pre-play margin

Standard downs vs. passing downs

Does Oregon State hold up once the down-and-distance turns against them?

10th percentile success on standard downs, 38th on passing downs — a 28-point gap between the two.

Fragile off scheduleBalanced, both workStruggles even on scheduleStandard-downs reliantOregon StateWeak on standard downsElite on standard downsFalls apart off scheduleHolds up off scheduleHawai'i18th standard · 41st passingUNLV51st standard · 7th passingStanford76th standard · 15th passingEastern Michigan52nd standard · 10th passingSan José State54th standard · 22nd passingNew Mexico State45th standard · 75th passingSacramento State23rd standard · 14th passingOklahoma State41st standard · 49th passingDuke20th standard · 29th passingFlorida State28th standard · 65th passingRutgers30th standard · 71st passingKansas70th standard · 35th passingBoston College27th standard · 56th passingNorfolk State16th standard · 9th passingLouisville96th standard · 70th passingMissouri36th standard · 85th passingMemphis69th standard · 65th passingGeorgia Southern24th standard · 45th passingOle Miss94th standard · 50th passingJacksonville State65th standard · 82nd passingNorth Dakota State86th standard · 27th passingArizona92nd standard · 86th passingUSC97th standard · 99th passingWake Forest56th standard · 97th passingTCU93rd standard · 8th passingDelaware70th standard · 31st passingUAB65th standard · 81st passingMichigan State62nd standard · 29th passingSouth Florida91st standard · 52nd passingFlorida International46th standard · 43rd passingNavy98th standard · 59th passingWisconsin13th standard · 18th passingOregon State10th standard · 38th passingSyracuse48th standard · 64th passingOhio State90th standard · 40th passingBall State12th standard · 24th passingPittsburgh30th standard · 76th passingColorado35th standard · 77th passingGeorgia Tech58th standard · 44th passingAuburn75th standard · 55th passingBaylor40th standard · 96th passingNorth Texas49th standard · 68th passingApp State44th standard · 90th passingIowa State4th standard · 23rd passingUTSA99th standard · 29th passingArkansas60th standard · 80th passingBoise State58th standard · 46th passingOregon35th standard · 33rd passingTulsa56th standard · 1st passingTulane31st standard · 2nd passingPurdue83rd standard · 88th passingMiddle Tennessee87th standard · 68th passingVanderbilt80th standard · 12th passingSan Diego State4th standard · 40th passingLSU33rd standard · 98th passingClemson1st standard · 19th passingCentral Michigan16th standard · 6th passingTexas Tech88th standard · 48th passingMichigan2nd standard · 62nd passingWestern Michigan39th standard · 20th passingOhio38th standard · 17th passingBuffalo7th standard · 14th passingTexas72nd standard · 94th passingCoastal Carolina61st standard · 52nd passingColorado State82nd standard · 91st passingWyoming65th standard · 36th passingTexas A&M85th standard · 72nd passingLiberty14th standard · 59th passingFlorida Atlantic43rd standard · 87th passingLouisiana19th standard · 92nd passingSouth Alabama50th standard · 73rd passingTroy22nd standard · 59th passingSam Houston78th standard · 61st passingNevada77th standard · 52nd passingWestern Kentucky25th standard · 34th passingWashington State8th standard · 3rd passingWashington81st standard · 4th passingCalifornia9th standard · 25th passingCharlotte73rd standard · 83rd passingTennessee65th standard · 78th passingUtah State4th standard · 93rd passing
Source CFB Zeitgeist · advanced team stats, Connelly success-rate definition
View all FBS teams as a table
TeamStandard-downs percentilePassing-downs percentile
App State44th90th
Arizona92nd86th
Arkansas60th80th
Auburn75th55th
Ball State12th24th
Baylor40th96th
Boise State58th46th
Boston College27th56th
Buffalo7th14th
California9th25th
Central Michigan16th6th
Charlotte73rd83rd
Clemson1st19th
Coastal Carolina61st52nd
Colorado35th77th
Colorado State82nd91st
Delaware70th31st
Duke20th29th
Eastern Michigan52nd10th
Florida Atlantic43rd87th
Florida International46th43rd
Florida State28th65th
Georgia Southern24th45th
Georgia Tech58th44th
Hawai'i18th41st
Iowa State4th23rd
Jacksonville State65th82nd
Kansas70th35th
LSU33rd98th
Liberty14th59th
Louisiana19th92nd
Louisville96th70th
Memphis69th65th
Michigan2nd62nd
Michigan State62nd29th
Middle Tennessee87th68th
Missouri36th85th
Navy98th59th
Nevada77th52nd
New Mexico State45th75th
Norfolk State16th9th
North Dakota State86th27th
North Texas49th68th
Ohio38th17th
Ohio State90th40th
Oklahoma State41st49th
Ole Miss94th50th
Oregon35th33rd
Oregon State10th38th
Pittsburgh30th76th
Purdue83rd88th
Rutgers30th71st
Sacramento State23rd14th
Sam Houston78th61st
San Diego State4th40th
San José State54th22nd
South Alabama50th73rd
South Florida91st52nd
Stanford76th15th
Syracuse48th64th
TCU93rd8th
Tennessee65th78th
Texas72nd94th
Texas A&M85th72nd
Texas Tech88th48th
Troy22nd59th
Tulane31st2nd
Tulsa56th1st
UAB65th81st
UNLV51st7th
USC97th99th
UTSA99th29th
Utah State4th93rd
Vanderbilt80th12th
Wake Forest56th97th
Washington81st4th
Washington State8th3rd
Western Kentucky25th34th
Western Michigan39th20th
Wisconsin13th18th
Wyoming65th36th

Halftime identity

Oregon State by half

1st-half offense ranks 28th percentile in FBS; 2nd-half, 74th — competitive snaps only, garbage time excluded from both halves.

league median1st half · 28th pctile2nd half · 74th pctileWorst in FBSBest in FBS
Source CFB Zeitgeist · advanced team stats, garbage-time adjusted by pre-play margin
Pass defense by zoneThe part of the field opponents keep attacking.

Pass-depth identity

What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), Oregon State’s passing game completes a completion rate above the FBS mean (68.8% vs 68.3% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 78-play sample) — mid-pack, 22 of 41 qualifying offenses.

We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.

Screened 59 claims, 59 survived · 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=78 short-zone plays, raw rate 69.2%
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Oregon State

CFB Zeitgeist

#60

+1.4

SP+

#90

-6.8

FPI

#85

-4.5

Elo

#116

1285

The national models put Oregon State between 85th and 116th nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is higher on them than any of these models, at 60th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Oregon State

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

Historical echoPrograms whose arc bent the same way -- then what happened.

Historical echo

Oregon State’s slide has precedent — and 2 of the 4 closest kept falling.

Programs whose stature fell in the same shape. The grey line is their decline; the color is what came next for them.

Tennessee 2014–2019
clawed back
UCLA 1996–2001
kept sliding
Illinois 1983–1988
clawed back
Kansas 1994–1999
kept sliding

An analogy on the shape of a program’s Zeitgeist stature arc — not a prediction. Interim calibration, medium confidence; matched among current FBS programs at a comparable level.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

59°F average kickoff temp; 16% of games had measurable precipitation; 6 mph average wind.

Based on 77 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site