Utah

2-0AP #17

Big 12 · Morgan Scalley, year 2 (3-0) · Rice-Eccles Stadium · 51,444 · 51,488 avg in 2026

The nationAP #17 · Coaches #17up 3 from last week
The model#30 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #21 (+13.0) · FPI #19
The marketUtah by 28vs Utah State · our model 78% Utah · a number, not a pick

LastW 43–10 vs Arkansas · Sat Sep 12 · Devon Dampier 261 pass yds, 2 TD, 1 INT

Nextvs Utah State · Sat Sep 19 · 3:30 pm ET · Rice-Eccles Stadium · Utah by 28 · series 73-28-4, won the last 3 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
54.5
Pts allowed/game
12.0
Total yards/gm#19 / 138 · 87th pct
537.5
Rush yards/gmT-#19 / 138 · 86th pct
252.5
Pass yards/gm#41 / 138 · 71st pct
285.0
Yards allowed/gm#38 / 138 · 73rd pct
265.0
Rush yds allowed/gmT-#33 / 138 · 76th pct
83.5
SacksT-#38 / 138 · 65th pct
5
InterceptionsT-#29 / 115 · 61st pct
2
3rd-down conv#10 / 138 · 93rd pct
61.9%
All 78 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
1075537.5/gm7.85/play#19 / 138 · 87th pct#13 / 69 · 82nd pct#2 / 16 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
530265.0/gm3.87/play#38 / 138 · 73rd pct#33 / 69 · 53rd pct#8 / 16 · 53rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
505252.5/gm3.69/playT-#19 / 138 · 86th pct#12 / 69 · 83rd pct#5 / 16 · 72nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
16783.5/gm1.22/playT-#33 / 138 · 76th pctT-#27 / 69 · 61st pct#8 / 16 · 53rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
8341.5/gmT-#35 / 138 · 73rd pctT-#19 / 69 · 72nd pct#9 / 16 · 47th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
5929.5/gmT-#29 / 138 · 79th pctT-#21 / 69 · 69th pctT-#7 / 16 · 56th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
84.0/gmT-#9 / 138 · 91st pctT-#6 / 69 · 88th pct#3 / 16 · 84th pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#53 / 138 · 50th pctT-#34 / 69 · 36th pctT-#8 / 16 · 31st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
570285.0/gm4.16/play#41 / 138 · 71st pct#23 / 69 · 67th pct#3 / 16 · 84th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
363181.5/gm2.65/play#53 / 138 · 62nd pct#37 / 69 · 47th pct#6 / 16 · 66th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
5427.0/gmT-#83 / 138 · 39th pctT-#48 / 69 · 29th pct#10 / 16 · 41st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
7839.0/gmT-#122 / 138 · 12th pct#62 / 69 · 11th pct#15 / 16 · 9th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
3718.5/gmT-#72 / 138 · 47th pctT-#44 / 69 · 36th pct#10 / 16 · 41st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3316.5/gmT-#50 / 138 · 60th pctT-#31 / 69 · 51st pct#7 / 16 · 59th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
73.5/gmT-#11 / 138 · 91st pctT-#9 / 69 · 85th pct#2 / 16 · 91st pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#13 / 138 · 80th pctT-#11 / 69 · 72nd pctT-#4 / 16 · 66th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating
Team
192.6192.6#10 / 115 · 92nd pct#10 / 59 · 84th pct#2 / 14 · 89th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Opp
83.183.1#3 / 91 · 97th pct#3 / 41 · 94th pct#2 / 10 · 85th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Interceptions thrown
Team
10.5/gmT-#52 / 138 · 49th pctT-#25 / 69 · 53rd pctT-#7 / 16 · 50th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#77 / 138 · 33rd pctT-#40 / 69 · 29th pctT-#11 / 16 · 25th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
52.5/gmT-#38 / 138 · 65th pctT-#21 / 69 · 60th pctT-#6 / 16 · 53rd pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#9 / 138 · 86th pctT-#6 / 69 · 83rd pctT-#2 / 16 · 78th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
115.5/gmT-#63 / 138 · 49th pctT-#37 / 69 · 42nd pctT-#10 / 16 · 38th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#20 / 138 · 83rd pctT-#15 / 69 · 78th pct#5 / 16 · 72nd pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
5728.5/gmT-#17 / 138 · 87th pctT-#10 / 69 · 85th pct#4 / 16 · 78th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3417.0/gmT-#57 / 138 · 58th pctT-#41 / 69 · 41st pct#12 / 16 · 28th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
136.5/gmT-#37 / 138 · 68th pctT-#19 / 69 · 67th pctT-#6 / 16 · 56th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
105.0/gmT-#66 / 138 · 48th pctT-#42 / 69 · 35th pctT-#10 / 16 · 28th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
2110.5/gmT-#114 / 138 · 15th pctT-#57 / 69 · 15th pctT-#14 / 16 · 9th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3015.0/gmT-#89 / 138 · 31st pctT-#45 / 69 · 29th pctT-#11 / 16 · 28th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
21.0/gmT-#51 / 138 · 51st pctT-#28 / 69 · 49th pctT-#7 / 16 · 50th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
31.5/gmT-#104 / 138 · 19th pctT-#56 / 69 · 15th pct#16 / 16 · 3rd pct#2 / 13 · 92nd pct
4th-down att
Team
42.0/gmT-#47 / 138 · 60th pctT-#24 / 69 · 59th pct#7 / 16 · 59th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#112 / 138 · 14th pctT-#59 / 69 · 10th pctT-#14 / 16 · 9th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
62:2331:12/gm#61 / 138 · 56th pct#30 / 69 · 57th pct#8 / 16 · 53rd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
57:3728:48/gm#52 / 138 · 63rd pct#30 / 69 · 57th pct#8 / 16 · 53rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.60 EPA/play4231 / 4273.8437
#65 FBS
10.45
#22 FBS
1195.789.2
+0.71 EPA/play1526 / 125013311.120198.151.9
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.60 EPA/play12221245.63
#11 FBS
21
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
+1.23 EPA/play8925148
#74 FBS
29.62
#24 FBS
57
+0.81 EPA/play72711316.1131

2026 stat leaders · Utah

through 2 games

Noah Bennee leads Utah with 148 receiving yards through 2 games.

1. Noah Bennee TE 148 receiving yards
2. Devon Dampier QB 437 passing yards
3. Braden Pegan WR 113 receiving yards
4. Nate Ritchie S 9 tackles
5. Johnathan Hall LB 9 tackles
How They Play · 2025

Utah fields an elite run-heavy offense behind an elite, gives up the big play defense.

Offense
97th pct EPA/play
Run/Pass
60% run plays
Defense
83rd pct EPA allowed
Defensive shape
22nd pct at limiting explosive plays

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Utah · 2025

Utah reads strongest in rushing epa (top 1%) and passing epa allowed (top 1%); the crux lives in rushing epa allowed, where Utah sits at the 15th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.35
97th
Success Rate +0.49
96th
Explosive Plays +1.28
58th
Rushing EPA +0.34
99th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.06
83rd
Success Rate Allowed +0.38
80th
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.33
22nd
Passing EPA Allowed -0.05
99th

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.40
83rd
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.17
15th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 13 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Utah · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Utah is worth +3.2 points more at home than on the road.

Bottom third of FBS, 33rd percentile of 133 programs

80% at home, 60% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (33–8 home, 25–17 away). Interval ±3.9.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Utah has beaten the number by +2.6 more at home than away over 74 games — inside the ±6.5 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Rice-Eccles Stadium seats 51,444 and has averaged 102% full (52,251, 27 games reported). Visitors cover a median 585 miles to get here since 2018 — 31st-longest of 135 FBS venues, inside the ordinary range. For the home side it is genuinely home ground: 30% of the 2026 roster (32 of 107 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 49 home games since 2018.

Home33–8Away25–17Edge+3.2 ±3.9Visitor trip585 mi

More in this tab

RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Utah

CFB Zeitgeist

#30

+5.6

SP+

#21

+13.0

FPI

#19

+15.1

Elo

#9

1874

The national models put Utah between 9th and 21st nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is more skeptical, at 30th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Utah

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

59°F average kickoff temp; 5% of games had measurable precipitation; 8 mph average wind.

Based on 76 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site