Wake Forest

2-0

ACC · Jake Dickert, year 2 (11-4) · Allegacy Federal Credit Union Stadium · 31,500 · 30,735 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#77 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #67 (+1.6) · FPI #52
The marketMiami by 21vs Miami · our model 18% Wake Forest · a number, not a pick

LastW 38–36 at Purdue · Sat Sep 12 · Giovanni Lopez 225 pass yds, 1 TD, 59 rush yds

Nextvs Miami · Fri Sep 18 · 7:30 pm ET · Allegacy Federal Credit Union Stadium · Miami by 21 · series 3-9, lost the last 8 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

The model has Wake Forest at #77 — the fanbase hasn't weighed in yet.

Jake Dickert's year 2 (2026): 2-0, behind Dave Clawson's 3-9 in the same spot.

Fanbase belief
Quiet
signal pending this week
The model
#77
CFB Zeitgeist · -0.8
✓ measured
Explore all 7 corners of the fanbase ↓

The Pulse on Wake Forest

Archive · Wk 2 · 132 mentions · medium confidence
50
Δ -0.7 vs last wk
132 mentions this week · conversation velocity

What moved it — last 14 days

Awaiting next signal window
"Demon Deacons" — Wake Forest fanbase · recurring line
20 mentions · sample growing
The Fever Year

Position = mood · width = volume · color = the kind of feeling

Inside the fanbase — all 7 corners

Cr/CFB
GGoogle News
BBlogger So Dear
CCampus paper
BBluesky
YYouTube
6 outlets & communities talking

One voice

+0.00whole-room sentiment · warm our read

Every cohort from the die-hards to the analytics crowd lands within 0.01 of each other — a rare consensus. The loudest voice in the room:

BBlogger So DearBeat · article

Recap: Wake Forest Outlasts Purdue 38-36 in 2OT

bloggersodear.com →

How Wake Forest fans actually talk real · top-upvoted

Rr/CFBthe room

Not as dumb as halftime interviews. I have never seen an interesting one in a big game

814 open ↗

The crowd’s loudest take by upvotes — read for mood, not as a side. The cohort read is the measured part.

The room, end to end

skeptical
buying in
Bettors+0.07
Die-hards+0.07

Cohort sentiment is a source-weighted model read — never a quote pinned to a person.

What this fanbase keeps coming back to our read · topic model

fan energy
38%
recent results
20%
where the program is headed
10%
the coaching staff
7%
offense
6%

Topics are model-labeled from Reddit — a rough signal of what this fanbase is circling right now.

220 mentions · 6 sources · week 2026-02. Counts, sources and the divergence rank are measured (fact). Cohort labels and sentiment are a source-weighted model read (our read) — never a quote attributed to a person.
Belief checklight on evidence

~ our readWake Forest fans are down on the program, but it's more feel than fact right now.

backed by facts
4% cited a stat or resultleague 6%
the mood
19% optimistic32% down

✓ counted We read 132 posts from Wake Forest fans this week.

Fanbase health · Wake Forest

Wake Forest's fanbase is growing — 65 of 100.

Audible (20 weighted voices in the latest week) and winning on the field (9-4 last season, 2-0 so far).

On the field — 9-4 last season, 2-0 so far75
How loud — 20 weighted voices in the latest week56

2 of 3 signals · on-field reading uses last season until 4 games are in · 0–100, bands at 26 / 51 / 76

More in this tab

ArgumentsRecurring arguments this fanbase keeps returning to.

What fans are saying

Fan claims · every quote verified verbatim

program directionOne fan's take

One fan believes Jake Dickert's debut was a success and the team has strong potential for 2026

Wake Forest won 9 games last year! It seemed like nobody talked about it, but Jake Dickert's debut was a huge success.

Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Aug 11, 2026 · via wfu

PodcastsThe shows this fanbase actually listens to.

From the booth

a recent episode about this team
Voice profileHow this fanbase sounds vs. every other fanbase.
Fanbase Voice 316 fan mentions
Doomers
Optimism
16th
Joy
2nd
Anger
82nd
Doom
92nd
Sarcasm
8th
vs the 94 highest-volume fanbases - 2026 season
This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site