Mountain West, at a glance.
Top 10 by power rating — last season final records.
Home Conferences FBS 2026 season
If New Mexico (+83 coaching premium), Fresno State (+65), and San Diego State (+46) are all overperforming — what happens when one of them cracks the CFP field? The Mountain West's 2026 story is about whether Group of Five coaching can break through.
Mountain West is outperforming its raw power profile. The league body of work is stronger than the market would expect.
Top 10 by power rating — last season final records.
The Mountain West doesn't have the recruiting budgets of the Power Four, but it has something else: almost every program in the conference plays better than its recruiting class should allow. New Mexico went 9-4 with the 138th-ranked recruiting class. Fresno State finished at SP+ #38 despite recruiting at #103. San Diego State sits at SP+ #32 with a #78 class. The Mountain West is the coaching premium capital of FBS.




The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. The gap between the top and bottom is narrow — a sign of genuine parity.
If New Mexico (+83 coaching premium), Fresno State (+65), and San Diego State (+46) are all overperforming — what happens when one of them cracks the CFP field? The Mountain West's 2026 story is about whether Group of Five coaching can break through.
The Premium StoryNew Mexico's coaching premium is +83 — the gap between their #138 recruiting rank and their #55 SP+ rating. That's one of the largest gaps in FBS. A program that spent most of the last decade finishing under .500 went 9-4 in 2025 and looked competitive against programs with three times the recruiting budget. Whether this is sustainable — or whether the Mountain West starts to lose players to the portal once national attention arrives — is the most interesting story in the conference.
Why it matters →
The Conference LeaderSan Diego State holds the Mountain West's highest SP+ ranking (#32) entering 2026, with a recruiting class ranked #78 nationally and a +46 coaching premium. The Aztecs went 9-4 in 2025 and are built around the same run-first, defense-first model that made them hard to beat for a decade. In a conference where most programs overperform, San Diego State is the one most likely to make noise in the CFP access conversation.
Why it matters →Not every Mountain West program runs the coaching surplus. Nevada went 3-9 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #88 nationally — a -29 coaching gap that's the conference's worst. Colorado State finished 2-10 with a #106 class, a -21 gap. Wyoming went 4-8 despite recruiting at #89. These programs are the ceiling argument for what the conference can produce — and the floor argument for what happens when coaching doesn't amplify the limited recruiting budget that every Mountain West school starts with.
How will Novak's legacy impact the future of Northern Illinois football?
What will be the impact of Nathan Pine's departure on Air Force athletics?
How will the chosen kickoff time impact fan attendance and team performance?
How will Donovan McNabb Jr. contribute to the UNLV football program?
What achievements will the graduating cadets bring to their future roles?
Where each Mountain West program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 67th percentile.
Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Mountain West teams, 10 programs.
2026 final — sorted by power rating. Stature tag = interim Zeitgeist calibration (medium confidence).
| # | Team | Record | RR50 | Resume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
UNLVRegional Program II#93
|
0-0 | +8.6 | +83.0 |
| 2 |
North Dakota StateNational Program II#51
|
0-0 | +7.8 | +81.3 |
| 3 |
Hawai'iRegional Program IV#108
|
0-0 | +6.5 | +75.8 |
| 4 |
New MexicoRegional Program V#128
|
0-0 | +5.5 | +72.3 |
| 5 |
Air ForceRegional Program II#89
|
0-0 | +4.2 | +70.6 |
| 6 |
WyomingRegional Program III#98
|
0-0 | +2.2 | +63.7 |
| 7 |
San José StateRegional Program IV#112
|
0-0 | +0.5 | +54.7 |
| 8 |
NevadaRegional Program IV#119
|
0-0 | -1.5 | +45.0 |
| 9 |
Northern IllinoisRegional Program IV#107
|
0-0 | -2.6 | +37.0 |
| 10 |
UTEPRegional Program V#134
|
0-0 | -2.7 | +36.0 |
Projected Standings · Mountain West · 2026
Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. AVG = expected wins; W–L = most-likely record.
| # | Team | W–L | PWR | AVG | ≥8 | ≥7 | ≥6 | ≥5 | ≥4 | ≥3 | ≥2 | ≥1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorites | ||||||||||||
| 1 | UNLV | 5–3 | +5.7 | 5.0 | 2 | 13 | 37 | 66 | 87 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 2 | North Dakota State | 5–3 | +5.0 | 4.9 | 2 | 11 | 34 | 63 | 86 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Challengers | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Hawai'i | 5–3 | +3.7 | 4.8 | 2 | 10 | 31 | 59 | 83 | 95 | 99 | ✓ |
| 4 | New Mexico | 4–4 | +2.6 | 4.4 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 48 | 74 | 92 | 98 | ✓ |
| 5 | Air Force | 4–4 | +1.4 | 4.4 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 46 | 73 | 91 | 98 | ✓ |
| The Field | ||||||||||||
| 6 | Wyoming | 4–4 | -0.6 | 3.8 | 2 | 10 | 30 | 58 | 82 | 96 | ✓ | |
| 7 | San José State | 4–4 | -2.3 | 3.6 | 2 | 9 | 26 | 53 | 79 | 94 | 99 | |
| 8 | Nevada | 3–5 | -4.3 | 3.1 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 38 | 67 | 89 | 98 | |
| Rebuilding | ||||||||||||
| 9 | UTEP | 3–5 | -5.6 | 3.0 | 3 | 13 | 35 | 64 | 87 | 98 | ||
| 10 | Northern Illinois | 3–5 | -5.5 | 3.0 | 3 | 13 | 34 | 63 | 87 | 98 | ||
Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2025 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.
| Team | Scoring | Converts | Defense | Identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UNLV | +0.31 | 46.9% | -0.21 | Big-play offense |
North Dakota State | +0.36 | 48.6% | +0.02 | Grind-it-out |
Hawai'i | +0.16 | 40.9% | -0.17 | Balanced |
New Mexico | +0.19 | 41.8% | -0.12 | Balanced |
Air Force | +0.29 | 47.8% | -0.41 | Defense is the problem |
Wyoming | +0.04 | 37.4% | -0.08 | Can't sustain drives |
San José State | +0.18 | 43.7% | -0.20 | Balanced |
Nevada | +0.03 | 36.9% | -0.19 | Can't sustain drives |
Northern Illinois | +0.04 | 34.3% | -0.18 | Can't sustain drives |
UTEP | +0.01 | 32.9% | -0.10 | Can't sustain drives |
Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2025 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.
Mountain West's highest CFB Index Scores, 2025 season.
| # | Player | Team | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aamaris BrownCB | UNLV | #1 of 364 |
| 2 | Simeon HarrisCB | Fresno State | #6 of 364 |
| 3 | John MillerLB | Utah State | #7 of 583 |
| 4 | Lemondre JoeCB | Colorado State | #8 of 364 |
| 5 | Danny ScuderoWR | San José State | #8 of 485 |
| 6 | Brevin HamblinS | Utah State | #11 of 544 |
| 7 | Ben FlorentineIDL | Wyoming | #13 of 330 |
| 8 | Jeremiah EarbyCB | Boise State | #16 of 364 |
| 9 | Noah AvingerCB | Utah State | #17 of 364 |
| 10 | Tyree MorrisIDL | Utah State | #15 of 330 |
Conference strength by RR50 (round-robin adjusted power).
Best available American odds · sportsbook consensus.
| # | Team | Odds |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
UNLV
|
+240 |
| 2 |
New Mexico
|
+220 |
| 3 |
North Dakota State
|
+280 |
| 4 |
Hawai'i
|
+400 |
| 5 |
Air Force
|
+500 |
| 6 |
San Jose State
|
+1800 |
| 7 |
Wyoming
|
+1500 |
| 8 |
Nevada
|
+1800 |
| 9 |
Northern Illinois
|
+5000 |
| 10 |
UTEP
|
+5500 |