Maryland

2-0

Big Ten · Mike Locksley, year 8 (38-44) · SECU Stadium · 51,802 · 43,421 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#65 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #37 (+9.1) · FPI #45
The marketVirginia Tech by 3vs Virginia Tech · our model 50% Maryland · a number, not a pick

LastW 38–14 at UConn · Sat Sep 12 · Derrick LeBlanc 2 sacks, 2 TFL, 2 tackles

Nextvs Virginia Tech · Sat Sep 19 · 7:30 pm ET · SECU Stadium · Virginia Tech by 3 · series 17-15, won the last 2 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
50.0
Pts allowed/game
7.0
Total yards/gm#15 / 138 · 89th pct
560.5
Rush yards/gm#27 / 138 · 81st pct
245.0
Pass yards/gm#27 / 138 · 81st pct
315.5
Yards allowed/gm#4 / 138 · 97th pct
154.0
Rush yds allowed/gm#5 / 138 · 97th pct
38.5
SacksT-#4 / 138 · 97th pct
10
InterceptionsT-#17 / 115 · 81st pct
3
3rd-down conv#18 / 138 · 87th pct
55.2%
All 77 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
1121560.5/gm7.19/play#15 / 138 · 89th pct#10 / 69 · 86th pct#2 / 18 · 92nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
308154.0/gm3.02/play#4 / 138 · 97th pct#3 / 69 · 96th pct#1 / 18 · 97th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
490245.0/gm3.14/play#27 / 138 · 81st pct#17 / 69 · 76th pct#4 / 18 · 81st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
7738.5/gm0.75/play#5 / 138 · 97th pct#5 / 69 · 93rd pct#1 / 18 · 97th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
7638.0/gmT-#62 / 138 · 53rd pctT-#31 / 69 · 51st pctT-#5 / 18 · 69th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
6231.0/gmT-#37 / 138 · 73rd pctT-#28 / 69 · 59th pct#5 / 18 · 75th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
94.5/gmT-#4 / 138 · 96th pctT-#3 / 69 · 95th pct#2 / 18 · 92nd pct#11 / 13 · 23rd pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 92nd pctT-#1 / 69 · 88th pctT-#1 / 18 · 92nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
631315.5/gm4.04/play#27 / 138 · 81st pct#16 / 69 · 78th pct#4 / 18 · 81st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
231115.5/gm2.26/playT-#7 / 138 · 95th pctT-#6 / 69 · 91st pct#3 / 18 · 86th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
8040.0/gm#20 / 138 · 86th pct#8 / 69 · 89th pct#3 / 18 · 86th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4020.0/gm#8 / 138 · 95th pct#6 / 69 · 92nd pct#2 / 18 · 92nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
6030.0/gmT-#7 / 138 · 95th pct#2 / 69 · 98th pct#2 / 18 · 92nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2010.0/gmT-#5 / 138 · 96th pct#5 / 69 · 93rd pct#1 / 18 · 97th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
42.0/gmT-#48 / 138 · 57th pctT-#33 / 69 · 46th pctT-#9 / 18 · 50th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#45 / 138 · 57th pctT-#29 / 69 · 46th pctT-#7 / 18 · 50th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating#49 / 115 · 58th pct#34 / 59 · 43rd pct#12 / 16 · 28th pct#2 / 13 · 92nd pct
150.3150.3
Interceptions thrown
Team
00.0/gmT-#92 / 138 · 17th pctT-#42 / 69 · 20th pctT-#10 / 18 · 25th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
31.5/gmT-#110 / 138 · 16th pctT-#60 / 69 · 11th pctT-#16 / 18 · 11th pct#2 / 13 · 92nd pct
Sacks (def)
Team
105.0/gmT-#4 / 138 · 97th pctT-#4 / 69 · 94th pct#1 / 18 · 97th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#9 / 138 · 86th pctT-#6 / 69 · 83rd pct#3 / 18 · 86th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
147.0/gmT-#29 / 138 · 73rd pctT-#18 / 69 · 68th pctT-#5 / 18 · 69th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
115.5/gmT-#81 / 138 · 34th pctT-#47 / 69 · 27th pctT-#13 / 18 · 25th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
5829.0/gmT-#14 / 138 · 89th pctT-#7 / 69 · 89th pct#2 / 18 · 92nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
189.0/gm#4 / 138 · 97th pct#4 / 69 · 95th pct#2 / 18 · 92nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
168.0/gmT-#16 / 138 · 88th pctT-#8 / 69 · 88th pctT-#2 / 18 · 89th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
73.5/gmT-#29 / 138 · 76th pctT-#20 / 69 · 67th pctT-#3 / 18 · 78th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
2914.5/gmT-#34 / 138 · 72nd pctT-#13 / 69 · 78th pctT-#3 / 18 · 81st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2613.0/gmT-#43 / 138 · 66th pctT-#21 / 69 · 66th pct#9 / 18 · 53rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
31.5/gmT-#23 / 138 · 74th pctT-#12 / 69 · 72nd pctT-#3 / 18 · 75th pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
00.0/gmT-#1 / 138 · 91st pctT-#1 / 69 · 90th pctT-#1 / 18 · 83rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down att
Team
52.5/gmT-#27 / 138 · 74th pctT-#13 / 69 · 75th pctT-#4 / 18 · 75th pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#20 / 138 · 74th pctT-#10 / 69 · 72nd pctT-#5 / 18 · 61st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
64:3432:17/gm#46 / 138 · 67th pct#21 / 69 · 70th pct#6 / 18 · 69th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
55:2627:43/gm#37 / 138 · 74th pct#21 / 69 · 70th pct#6 / 18 · 69th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.19 EPA/play7253 / 7273.6533
#37 FBS
7.43
#60 FBS
0149.55873.98.01.4
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.12 EPA/play242261214.73
#11 FBS
15
-0.58 EPA/play25224873.63
#11 FBS
14
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
Possession Receiver1214187
#33 FBS
13.42
#24 FBS
60
Slot Technician · +0.36 EPA/play132161479.2124
+0.38 EPA/play2266911.5030

2026 stat leaders · Maryland

through 2 games

Na'eem Abdul-Rahim Gladding leads Maryland with 187 receiving yards through 2 games.

1. Na'eem Abdul-Rahim Gladding WR 187 receiving yards
2. Malik Washington QB 533 passing yards
3. Chris Durr Jr. WR 147 receiving yards
4. Carlton Smith LB 10 tackles
5. Trey Reddick LB 9 tackles
How They Play · 2025

Maryland fields a limited pass-first, explosive, big-play offense behind a strong defense.

Offense
28th pct EPA/play
Run/Pass
62% pass plays
Tempo
74th pct explosiveness
Defense
62nd pct EPA allowed

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Maryland · 2025

Maryland reads strongest in explosive plays (top 27%) and passing epa allowed (top 38%); the crux lives in rushing epa, where Maryland sits at the 9th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.10
28th
Success Rate +0.38
17th
Explosive Plays +1.32
74th
Rushing EPA -0.02
9th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.11
62nd
Success Rate Allowed +0.43
30th
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.26
47th
Passing EPA Allowed +0.20
63rd

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.20
31st
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.09
46th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 12 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Maryland · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Maryland is worth +3.1 points more at home than on the road.

Bottom third of FBS, 30th percentile of 133 programs

45% at home, 33% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (20–24 home, 13–26 away). Interval ±5.3.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Maryland has beaten the number by +0.7 more at home than away over 72 games — inside the ±8.4 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

SECU Stadium seats 51,802 and has averaged 72% full (37,475, 29 games reported). Visitors cover a median 422 miles to get here since 2018 — 67th-shortest of 135 FBS venues, inside the ordinary range. For the home side it is genuinely home ground: 54% of the 2026 roster (54 of 100 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 50 home games since 2018.

Home20–24Away13–26Edge+3.1 ±5.3Visitor trip422 mi

More in this tab

Tendency driftHow this coordinator's calls have drifted since arriving.

Season by season

How Maryland’s current staff calls plays, year over year

Defense: co-Aazaar Abdul-Rahim / Ted Monachino (2025–2026)
1st-down pass rate
2025: 58% → 2026: 58% · 0-pt range · #204 of 203 · less than most
Red-zone pass rate
2025: 58% → 2026: 40% · 18-pt range · #57 of 200 · a typical amount
Pass defense by zoneThe part of the field opponents keep attacking.

Pass-depth identity

What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), Maryland’s passing game completes a completion rate above the FBS mean (73.1% vs 68.3% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 73-play sample) — mid-pack, 37 of 41 qualifying offenses.

We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.

Screened 59 claims, 59 survived · 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=73 short-zone plays, raw rate 78.1%
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Maryland

CFB Zeitgeist

#65

+0.8

SP+

#37

+9.1

FPI

#45

+5.5

Elo

#66

1495

The national models put Maryland between 37th and 66th nationally — CFB Zeitgeist agrees, slotting them 65th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Maryland

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

64°F average kickoff temp; 7% of games had measurable precipitation; 7 mph average wind.

Based on 75 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site