North Dakota State

3-0

Mountain West · Tim Polasek, year 1 (3-0) · Fargodome · 18,700 · 16,892 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#70 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #61 (+2.6) · FPI #66
The marketNorth Dakota State by 27.5at Sacramento State · our model 60% North Dakota State · a number, not a pick

LastW 38–32 at Air Force · Sat Sep 12 · Nathan Hayes 228 pass yds, 2 TD, 1 INT

Nextat Sacramento State · Sat Sep 19 · 10:30 pm ET · Hornet Stadium · North Dakota State by 27.5 · first meeting on record · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
36.3
Pts allowed/game
13.0
Total yards/gm#16 / 138 · 89th pct
373.3
Rush yards/gm#28 / 138 · 80th pct
161.0
Pass yards/gm#26 / 138 · 82nd pct
212.3
Yards allowed/gm#80 / 138 · 42nd pct
230.3
Rush yds allowed/gm#100 / 138 · 28th pct
103.7
SacksT-#11 / 138 · 89th pct
7
InterceptionsT-#1 / 115 · 98th pct
5
3rd-down convT-#73 / 138 · 46th pct
40.0%
All 93 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
1120373.3/gm5.71/play#16 / 138 · 89th pct#11 / 70 · 85th pct#3 / 10 · 75th pct
Opp
691230.3/gm4.11/play#80 / 138 · 42nd pct#54 / 70 · 24th pct#4 / 10 · 65th pct
Rush yards
Team
483161.0/gm2.46/play#28 / 138 · 80th pct#18 / 70 · 75th pct#6 / 10 · 45th pct
Opp
311103.7/gm1.85/play#100 / 138 · 28th pct#62 / 70 · 12th pct#5 / 10 · 55th pct
Rush carries
Team
12441.3/gm#1 / 138 · 99th pct#1 / 70 · 99th pct#1 / 10 · 95th pct
Opp
10836.0/gm#135 / 138 · 3rd pct#70 / 70 · 1st pct#9 / 10 · 15th pct
Rush TDs
Team
51.7/gmT-#35 / 138 · 70th pctT-#23 / 70 · 60th pctT-#3 / 10 · 70th pct
Opp
31.0/gmT-#86 / 138 · 31st pctT-#57 / 70 · 16th pctT-#3 / 10 · 55th pct
Net pass yards
Team
637212.3/gm3.25/play#26 / 138 · 82nd pct#16 / 70 · 78th pct#3 / 10 · 75th pct
Opp
380126.7/gm2.26/play#59 / 138 · 58th pct#39 / 70 · 45th pct#5 / 10 · 55th pct
Pass attempts
Team
7224.0/gmT-#32 / 138 · 77th pct#15 / 70 · 79th pct#4 / 10 · 65th pct
Opp
6020.0/gmT-#69 / 138 · 49th pctT-#38 / 70 · 46th pctT-#4 / 10 · 60th pct
Completions
Team
5117.0/gmT-#24 / 138 · 83rd pct#11 / 70 · 85th pct#4 / 10 · 65th pct
Opp
3311.0/gmT-#50 / 138 · 60th pctT-#31 / 70 · 51st pct#4 / 10 · 65th pct
Pass TDs
Team
62.0/gmT-#17 / 138 · 83rd pctT-#14 / 70 · 74th pct#2 / 10 · 85th pct
Opp
20.7/gmT-#45 / 138 · 57th pctT-#29 / 70 · 46th pctT-#3 / 10 · 65th pct
Passer rating
Team
158.8158.8#38 / 115 · 67th pct#26 / 60 · 57th pct
Opp
112.5112.5#32 / 91 · 65th pct#24 / 42 · 44th pct
Interceptions thrown
Team
20.7/gmT-#23 / 138 · 74th pctT-#8 / 70 · 77th pct#4 / 10 · 65th pct
Opp
51.7/gmT-#135 / 138 · 1st pctT-#69 / 70 · 1st pctT-#9 / 10 · 10th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
72.3/gmT-#11 / 138 · 89th pctT-#7 / 70 · 88th pctT-#2 / 10 · 80th pct
Opp
51.7/gmT-#101 / 138 · 20th pctT-#56 / 70 · 14th pctT-#6 / 10 · 40th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
103.3/gmT-#79 / 138 · 38th pctT-#45 / 70 · 31st pct#8 / 10 · 25th pct
Opp
165.3/gmT-#129 / 138 · 6th pct#69 / 70 · 2nd pct#8 / 10 · 25th pct
First downs
Team
6020.0/gmT-#9 / 138 · 93rd pct#5 / 70 · 94th pctT-#2 / 10 · 80th pct
Opp
4414.7/gmT-#106 / 138 · 23rd pct#63 / 70 · 11th pctT-#5 / 10 · 50th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
165.3/gmT-#16 / 138 · 88th pctT-#8 / 70 · 88th pct#3 / 10 · 75th pct
Opp
124.0/gmT-#91 / 138 · 30th pctT-#52 / 70 · 24th pctT-#5 / 10 · 50th pct
3rd-down att
Team
4013.3/gmT-#5 / 138 · 96th pct#1 / 70 · 99th pct#3 / 10 · 75th pct
Opp
3612.0/gmT-#126 / 138 · 8th pct#68 / 70 · 4th pct#7 / 10 · 35th pct
4th-down conv
Team
82.7/gm#1 / 138 · 99th pct#1 / 70 · 99th pct#1 / 10 · 95th pct
Opp
41.3/gmT-#121 / 138 · 9th pctT-#63 / 70 · 7th pct#10 / 10 · 5th pct
4th-down att
Team
93.0/gm#5 / 138 · 97th pct#2 / 70 · 98th pct#2 / 10 · 85th pct
Opp
51.7/gmT-#98 / 138 · 25th pctT-#54 / 70 · 20th pctT-#8 / 10 · 20th pct
Time of possession
Team
98:3932:53/gm#2 / 138 · 99th pct#2 / 70 · 98th pct#1 / 10 · 95th pct
Opp
81:2127:07/gm#130 / 138 · 6th pct#70 / 70 · 1st pct#7 / 10 · 35th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.18 EPA/play2347 / 6770.1598
#19 FBS
8.96
#14 FBS
2168.76161.58.55.6
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.02 EPA/play5336180
#32 FBS
52
#43 FBS
31
+0.11 EPA/play7336145
#72 FBS
4.02
#43 FBS
15
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
+0.76 EPA/play18311149
#72 FBS
13.5051
+0.48 EPA/play153696162
#24 FBS
44
Complete TE · +0.21 EPA/play81399010123

2026 stat leaders · North Dakota State

through 3 games

Donovan Woolen leads North Dakota State with 22 tackles through 3 games.

1. Donovan Woolen LB 22 tackles
2. Nathan Hayes QB 598 passing yards
3. Gavin Sell LB 14 tackles
4. Darius Givance S 13 tackles
5. Jackson Williams WR 149 receiving yards
How They Play · 2026

North Dakota State fields a capable run-heavy offense behind an elite, bend-don't-break defense.

Offense
55th pct EPA/play
Run/Pass
62% run plays
Defense
95th pct EPA allowed
Defensive shape
95th pct at limiting explosive plays

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · North Dakota State · 2026

North Dakota State reads strongest in epa allowed (top 5%) and explosive plays allowed (top 5%); the crux lives in passing epa, where North Dakota State sits at the 45th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.20
55th
Success Rate +0.43
65th
Explosive Plays +1.34
75th
Rushing EPA +0.10
75th
Red-Zone Finish +4.64
75th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed -0.12
95th
Success Rate Allowed +0.37
75th
Explosive Plays Allowed +0.98
95th
Passing EPA Allowed +0.07
85th
Red-Zone Defense +2.72
95th

hidden math · special situations

Field Position (O) +31.82
75th
Passing EPA +0.35
45th
Rushing EPA Allowed -0.16
95th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 3 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 10 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · North Dakota State · 2018–present · FBS opponents

North Dakota State is worth +2.9 points more at home than on the road.

Bottom third of FBS, 29th percentile of 133 programs

100% at home, 67% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (6–0 home, 4–2 away). Interval ±8.2.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, North Dakota State has beaten the number by +2.1 more at home than away over 53 games — inside the ±7.2 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Fargodome seats 18,700 and has averaged 83% full (15,546, 18 games reported). Visitors face the 10th-longest trip of 135 FBS venues: a median 698 miles since 2018. The map isn't translating, though — the split above still reads bottom third of fbs. 11% of the 2026 roster (13 of 116 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 64 home games since 2018.

Home6–0Away4–2Edge+2.9 ±8.2Visitor trip698 mi

More in this tab

Position battlesReps are split -- here's who's actually winning them.

Positional competition · RB room

The carries are split. The job isn’t.

DJ Scott and Myles Mitchell split the carries (35/70 vs 35/70) -- but the job isn't split the same way.

DJ ScottMyles Mitchell
Carries
3535
the baseline -- every row below is tested against this split, not a flat 50/50
Targets
5/83/8
shared -- dots touch, this room really is a committee here
Top-5-carry share
43.5%53.6%
concentration alone -- EPA/carry doesn't corroborate, read with caution
Screened 2 claims, 0 survived, 2 falsified
Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

Standard downs vs. passing downs

Does North Dakota State hold up once the down-and-distance turns against them?

86th percentile success on standard downs, 27th on passing downs — a 59-point gap between the two.

Fragile off scheduleBalanced, both workStruggles even on scheduleStandard-downs reliantNorth Dakota StateWeak on standard downsElite on standard downsFalls apart off scheduleHolds up off scheduleHawai'i18th standard · 41st passingUNLV51st standard · 7th passingStanford76th standard · 15th passingEastern Michigan52nd standard · 10th passingSan José State54th standard · 22nd passingNew Mexico State45th standard · 75th passingSacramento State23rd standard · 14th passingOklahoma State41st standard · 49th passingDuke20th standard · 29th passingFlorida State28th standard · 65th passingRutgers30th standard · 71st passingKansas70th standard · 35th passingBoston College27th standard · 56th passingNorfolk State16th standard · 9th passingLouisville96th standard · 70th passingMissouri36th standard · 85th passingMemphis69th standard · 65th passingGeorgia Southern24th standard · 45th passingOle Miss94th standard · 50th passingJacksonville State65th standard · 82nd passingNorth Dakota State86th standard · 27th passingArizona92nd standard · 86th passingUSC97th standard · 99th passingWake Forest56th standard · 97th passingTCU93rd standard · 8th passingDelaware70th standard · 31st passingUAB65th standard · 81st passingMichigan State62nd standard · 29th passingSouth Florida91st standard · 52nd passingFlorida International46th standard · 43rd passingNavy98th standard · 59th passingWisconsin13th standard · 18th passingOregon State10th standard · 38th passingSyracuse48th standard · 64th passingOhio State90th standard · 40th passingBall State12th standard · 24th passingPittsburgh30th standard · 76th passingColorado35th standard · 77th passingGeorgia Tech58th standard · 44th passingAuburn75th standard · 55th passingBaylor40th standard · 96th passingNorth Texas49th standard · 68th passingApp State44th standard · 90th passingIowa State4th standard · 23rd passingUTSA99th standard · 29th passingArkansas60th standard · 80th passingBoise State58th standard · 46th passingOregon35th standard · 33rd passingTulsa56th standard · 1st passingTulane31st standard · 2nd passingPurdue83rd standard · 88th passingMiddle Tennessee87th standard · 68th passingVanderbilt80th standard · 12th passingSan Diego State4th standard · 40th passingLSU33rd standard · 98th passingClemson1st standard · 19th passingCentral Michigan16th standard · 6th passingTexas Tech88th standard · 48th passingMichigan2nd standard · 62nd passingWestern Michigan39th standard · 20th passingOhio38th standard · 17th passingBuffalo7th standard · 14th passingTexas72nd standard · 94th passingCoastal Carolina61st standard · 52nd passingColorado State82nd standard · 91st passingWyoming65th standard · 36th passingTexas A&M85th standard · 72nd passingLiberty14th standard · 59th passingFlorida Atlantic43rd standard · 87th passingLouisiana19th standard · 92nd passingSouth Alabama50th standard · 73rd passingTroy22nd standard · 59th passingSam Houston78th standard · 61st passingNevada77th standard · 52nd passingWestern Kentucky25th standard · 34th passingWashington State8th standard · 3rd passingWashington81st standard · 4th passingCalifornia9th standard · 25th passingCharlotte73rd standard · 83rd passingTennessee65th standard · 78th passingUtah State4th standard · 93rd passing
Source CFB Zeitgeist · advanced team stats, Connelly success-rate definition
View all FBS teams as a table
TeamStandard-downs percentilePassing-downs percentile
App State44th90th
Arizona92nd86th
Arkansas60th80th
Auburn75th55th
Ball State12th24th
Baylor40th96th
Boise State58th46th
Boston College27th56th
Buffalo7th14th
California9th25th
Central Michigan16th6th
Charlotte73rd83rd
Clemson1st19th
Coastal Carolina61st52nd
Colorado35th77th
Colorado State82nd91st
Delaware70th31st
Duke20th29th
Eastern Michigan52nd10th
Florida Atlantic43rd87th
Florida International46th43rd
Florida State28th65th
Georgia Southern24th45th
Georgia Tech58th44th
Hawai'i18th41st
Iowa State4th23rd
Jacksonville State65th82nd
Kansas70th35th
LSU33rd98th
Liberty14th59th
Louisiana19th92nd
Louisville96th70th
Memphis69th65th
Michigan2nd62nd
Michigan State62nd29th
Middle Tennessee87th68th
Missouri36th85th
Navy98th59th
Nevada77th52nd
New Mexico State45th75th
Norfolk State16th9th
North Dakota State86th27th
North Texas49th68th
Ohio38th17th
Ohio State90th40th
Oklahoma State41st49th
Ole Miss94th50th
Oregon35th33rd
Oregon State10th38th
Pittsburgh30th76th
Purdue83rd88th
Rutgers30th71st
Sacramento State23rd14th
Sam Houston78th61st
San Diego State4th40th
San José State54th22nd
South Alabama50th73rd
South Florida91st52nd
Stanford76th15th
Syracuse48th64th
TCU93rd8th
Tennessee65th78th
Texas72nd94th
Texas A&M85th72nd
Texas Tech88th48th
Troy22nd59th
Tulane31st2nd
Tulsa56th1st
UAB65th81st
UNLV51st7th
USC97th99th
UTSA99th29th
Utah State4th93rd
Vanderbilt80th12th
Wake Forest56th97th
Washington81st4th
Washington State8th3rd
Western Kentucky25th34th
Western Michigan39th20th
Wisconsin13th18th
Wyoming65th36th
Pass defense by zoneThe part of the field opponents keep attacking.

Pass-depth identity

What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), North Dakota State’s passing game completes a completion rate above the FBS mean (70.4% vs 68.3% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 63-play sample) — mid-pack, 33 of 41 qualifying offenses.

We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.

Screened 59 claims, 59 survived · 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=63 short-zone plays, raw rate 73.0%
Havoc & trenchesDisruption, run-blocking, and down-and-distance efficiency.

Havoc & trenches

Disruption, run-blocking, and down-and-distance efficiency.

Havoc Rate (D) 0.165
85th
Havoc Allowed (O) 0.120
85th
Front-Seven Havoc (D) 0.099
75th
Secondary Havoc (D) 0.065
55th
Stuff Rate (D) 0.168
45th
Stuff Rate Allowed (O) 0.189
45th
Line Yards (O) 2.851
25th
Line Yards Allowed (D) 2.327
95th
Standard-Downs Success (O) 0.495
65th
Standard-Downs Success Allowed (D) 0.472
55th
Passing-Downs Success (O) 0.273
35th
Passing-Downs Success Allowed (D) 0.165
95th
Screened 12 claims, 12 survived · 2026 season, FBS only, min. 3 games with data this season
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank North Dakota State

CFB Zeitgeist

#70

-0.1

SP+

#61

+2.6

FPI

#66

+0.7

Elo

#46

1567

The national models put North Dakota State between 46th and 66th nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is more skeptical, at 70th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · North Dakota State

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site