CFB Zeitgeist

Home Conferences FBS 2026 season

Conference USA

Coaching Premium League

North Texas finished 12-2 with the 112th recruiting class. Can they earn the kind of committee respect that turns that record into a New Year's Six bid — or does Conference USA's bottom tier (Charlotte went 1-11, UTEP went 2-10) cap how far any program here can climb in the selection room?

Conference USA is outperforming its raw power profile. The league body of work is stronger than the market would expect.

#10overall
#10in FBS
+3.6RR50
+7.3upper strength
10teams
0top-25 teams
Power snapshot Projected 2026 standing

Coaching Premium League

North Texas went 12-2 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #112 nationally. Old Dominion went 10-3 with a #102 class. UTSA finished at SP+ #26 with a #107 recruiting rank. The top three teams in Conference USA all carry coaching premiums above +80 — which means the coaches in this conference are collectively doing more with less than nearly any other league in FBS. Meanwhile UTEP went 2-10 with the #70 recruiting class.

0 top-25 teams.

The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. The gap between the top and bottom is narrow — a sign of genuine parity.

The question heading into 2026.

North Texas finished 12-2 with the 112th recruiting class. Can they earn the kind of committee respect that turns that record into a New Year's Six bid — or does Conference USA's bottom tier (Charlotte went 1-11, UTEP went 2-10) cap how far any program here can climb in the selection room?

Tools Matchup Simulator Compare Teams Playoff Forecast Style map Head to head Power map

North Texas Went 12-2 With the 112th Recruiting Class

North Texas's coaching premium is +100 — the gap between their #112 recruiting rank and their #12 SP+ rating. Twelve wins in 2025 from a program in Denton, Texas that competes for recruits in the shadow of Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, TCU, and Baylor. No transfer portal intervention, no sudden spike in NIL budget: just a coaching staff that turns players other programs passed over into a team that wins twelve games. If Conference USA gets talked about nationally, this is why.

Why it matters →

Old Dominion's 10-3 Season Matches the North Texas Story

Old Dominion went 10-3 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #102 nationally — a +91 coaching premium that makes them the second-best overperformer in the conference. The program that started as an FCS power in Norfolk, Virginia and made the move to FBS in 2012 has spent more than a decade proving it belongs. Ten wins in 2025 is the most compelling argument they've made yet.

Why it matters →

UTEP Recruited at #70 and Went 2-10

UTEP's coaching gap is -51: a #70 recruiting class — the conference's best after Rice's #70 match — produced a 2-10 season. Charlotte went 1-11. Middle Tennessee went 3-9 with a #98 class. The bottom of Conference USA is a study in what happens when G5 programs recruit well enough to create expectations but can't close the gap on the field. Every win by North Texas and Old Dominion lands differently when you know this is the same conference.

Why it matters →

Active arcs our read

All arcs →
Fan pulse Last 30 days · 250 mentions
15% positive 72% neutral 13% negative
Kennesaw State
77
→ neutral
Florida International
73
→ neutral
Sam Houston
30
↑ positive
Liberty
20
→ neutral
Jacksonville State
18
↓ negative
New Mexico State
13
↑ positive
Fan confidence — FBS percentile

Where each Conference USA program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 66th percentile.

Delaware
Bullish+41
Sam Houston
Bullish
Liberty
Souring
The coaching premium
Recruiting class rank vs. SP+ performance — where coaches add or subtract value
Above line = coaching premium
Below line = underperforming
Gap = recruiting rank minus SP+ rank

Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Conference USA teams, 10 programs.

Coaching grades
Coaching premium ↑
Liberty
+53
Kennesaw
+24
Delaware
+23
Missouri
+20
Jacksonville
+16
Underperforming ↓
Middle
-22
Sam
-19
New
-17
Western
-3

Standings

2026 final — sorted by power rating. Stature tag = interim Zeitgeist calibration (medium confidence).

#TeamRecordRR50Resume
1 LibertyRegional Program II#91 0-0 +7.8 +81.0
2 Jacksonville StateRegional Program III#97 0-0 +6.7 +76.1
3 Western KentuckyRegional Program II#87 0-0 +4.6 +71.3
4 DelawareRegional Program V#124 0-0 +3.4 +68.5
5 Kennesaw StateRegional Program IV#121 0-0 +3.2 +66.8
6 Florida InternationalRegional Program V#123 0-0 +2.4 +64.4
7 Missouri StateRegional Program V#129 0-0 +1.6 +60.6
8 Middle TennesseeRegional Program IV#118 0-0 -1.5 +44.6
9 Sam HoustonRegional Program V#126 0-0 -1.8 +42.2
10 New Mexico StateRegional Program VI#135 0-0 -2.7 +36.3

Projected Standings · Conference USA · 2026

Win Projection

Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. AVG = expected wins; W–L = most-likely record.

# Team W–L PWR AVG ≥8≥7≥6≥5≥4≥3≥2≥1
Favorites
1Liberty5–3+5.45.231642719098
2Jacksonville State5–3+4.45.021337658797
Challengers
3Western Kentucky5–3+2.24.5172349769298
4Delaware4–4+1.04.141639678897
5Kennesaw State4–4+0.84.141538658797
The Field
6Florida International4–4+0.04.131437668797
7Missouri State4–4-0.73.82102957829599
8Middle Tennessee3–5-3.83.2151741699099
Rebuilding
9Sam Houston3–5-4.23.2141640699099
10New Mexico State3–5-5.03.0131334638698

How they play

Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2025 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.

ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate
Team ScoringConvertsBig playsDefensePacePass rate Identity
Liberty+0.1643.1%+1.20-0.1968.038.7%Balanced
Jacksonville State+0.1943.9%+1.27-0.1569.633.6%Balanced
Western Kentucky+0.1743.4%+1.21-0.1069.854.5%Balanced
Delaware+0.1943.2%+1.30-0.2273.057.0%Balanced
Kennesaw State+0.1640.8%+1.37-0.1868.843.9%Big-play offense
Florida International+0.1640.8%+1.33-0.1670.346.9%Balanced
Missouri State+0.1739.4%+1.49-0.2465.151.4%Big-play offense
Middle Tennessee+0.1541.8%+1.26-0.2167.861.4%Balanced
Sam Houston-0.0135.5%+1.26-0.2663.251.2%Can't sustain drives
New Mexico State+0.0336.1%+1.29-0.1069.057.0%Can't sustain drives

Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2025 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.

Top players

Conference USA's highest CFB Index Scores, 2025 season.

#PlayerTeamNational
1Jakari FosterSLouisiana Tech#4 of 544
2Elijah HillEDGEKennesaw State#12 of 420
3Damonte SmithIDLMiddle Tennessee#9 of 330
4Mister ClarkCBFlorida International#12 of 364
5Cam CookRBJacksonville State#5 of 326
6Kadarion JohnsonIDLUTEP#11 of 330
7Naeten MitchellSNew Mexico State#12 of 544
8Jacob FieldsSLouisiana Tech#17 of 544
9Sifa LeotaLBLouisiana Tech#40 of 583
10Walker O'SteenLBJacksonville State#41 of 583

Where Conference USA stands nationally

Conference strength by RR50 (round-robin adjusted power).

1 SEC SEC
+11.4
2 B10 Big Ten
+10.1
3 IND FBS Independents
+9.4
4 B12 Big 12
+8.3
5 ACC ACC
+8.2
6 P12 Pac-12
+5.3
7 AAC American Athletic
+5.3
8 MW Mountain West
+4.0
9 SB Sun Belt
+3.7
10 CUSA Conference USA
+3.6