Conference USA, at a glance.
Top 10 by power rating — last season final records.
Home Conferences FBS 2026 season
North Texas finished 12-2 with the 112th recruiting class. Can they earn the kind of committee respect that turns that record into a New Year's Six bid — or does Conference USA's bottom tier (Charlotte went 1-11, UTEP went 2-10) cap how far any program here can climb in the selection room?
Conference USA is outperforming its raw power profile. The league body of work is stronger than the market would expect.
Top 10 by power rating — last season final records.
North Texas went 12-2 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #112 nationally. Old Dominion went 10-3 with a #102 class. UTSA finished at SP+ #26 with a #107 recruiting rank. The top three teams in Conference USA all carry coaching premiums above +80 — which means the coaches in this conference are collectively doing more with less than nearly any other league in FBS. Meanwhile UTEP went 2-10 with the #70 recruiting class.




The depth argument for this conference rests on how many credible opponents are clustered behind the leader. The gap between the top and bottom is narrow — a sign of genuine parity.
North Texas finished 12-2 with the 112th recruiting class. Can they earn the kind of committee respect that turns that record into a New Year's Six bid — or does Conference USA's bottom tier (Charlotte went 1-11, UTEP went 2-10) cap how far any program here can climb in the selection room?
The Best Story in C-USANorth Texas's coaching premium is +100 — the gap between their #112 recruiting rank and their #12 SP+ rating. Twelve wins in 2025 from a program in Denton, Texas that competes for recruits in the shadow of Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, TCU, and Baylor. No transfer portal intervention, no sudden spike in NIL budget: just a coaching staff that turns players other programs passed over into a team that wins twelve games. If Conference USA gets talked about nationally, this is why.
Why it matters →
The Co-LeaderOld Dominion went 10-3 in 2025 with a recruiting class ranked #102 nationally — a +91 coaching premium that makes them the second-best overperformer in the conference. The program that started as an FCS power in Norfolk, Virginia and made the move to FBS in 2012 has spent more than a decade proving it belongs. Ten wins in 2025 is the most compelling argument they've made yet.
Why it matters →
The Other SideUTEP's coaching gap is -51: a #70 recruiting class — the conference's best after Rice's #70 match — produced a 2-10 season. Charlotte went 1-11. Middle Tennessee went 3-9 with a #98 class. The bottom of Conference USA is a study in what happens when G5 programs recruit well enough to create expectations but can't close the gap on the field. Every win by North Texas and Old Dominion lands differently when you know this is the same conference.
Why it matters →How will these commitments impact Notre Dame’s future roster and competitiveness?
How will Chadwell's medical condition affect Liberty's performance this season?
Will SMU's shift from relevance to championship pursuit align with Sam Houston's turnaround efforts?
How will Jacksonville State perform in their upcoming series against San Jose State?
Where each Conference USA program stands nationally in fan sentiment (100th = most positive in FBS, 0 = least). Conference median: 66th percentile.
Positive gap means the coaching staff won more than the recruiting class predicted. Data: Conference USA teams, 10 programs.
2026 final — sorted by power rating. Stature tag = interim Zeitgeist calibration (medium confidence).
| # | Team | Record | RR50 | Resume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
LibertyRegional Program II#91
|
0-0 | +7.8 | +81.0 |
| 2 |
Jacksonville StateRegional Program III#97
|
0-0 | +6.7 | +76.1 |
| 3 |
Western KentuckyRegional Program II#87
|
0-0 | +4.6 | +71.3 |
| 4 |
DelawareRegional Program V#124
|
0-0 | +3.4 | +68.5 |
| 5 |
Kennesaw StateRegional Program IV#121
|
0-0 | +3.2 | +66.8 |
| 6 |
Florida InternationalRegional Program V#123
|
0-0 | +2.4 | +64.4 |
| 7 |
Missouri StateRegional Program V#129
|
0-0 | +1.6 | +60.6 |
| 8 |
Middle TennesseeRegional Program IV#118
|
0-0 | -1.5 | +44.6 |
| 9 |
Sam HoustonRegional Program V#126
|
0-0 | -1.8 | +42.2 |
| 10 |
New Mexico StateRegional Program VI#135
|
0-0 | -2.7 | +36.3 |
Projected Standings · Conference USA · 2026
Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. AVG = expected wins; W–L = most-likely record.
| # | Team | W–L | PWR | AVG | ≥8 | ≥7 | ≥6 | ≥5 | ≥4 | ≥3 | ≥2 | ≥1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorites | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Liberty | 5–3 | +5.4 | 5.2 | 3 | 16 | 42 | 71 | 90 | 98 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 2 | Jacksonville State | 5–3 | +4.4 | 5.0 | 2 | 13 | 37 | 65 | 87 | 97 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Challengers | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Western Kentucky | 5–3 | +2.2 | 4.5 | 1 | 7 | 23 | 49 | 76 | 92 | 98 | ✓ |
| 4 | Delaware | 4–4 | +1.0 | 4.1 | 4 | 16 | 39 | 67 | 88 | 97 | ✓ | |
| 5 | Kennesaw State | 4–4 | +0.8 | 4.1 | 4 | 15 | 38 | 65 | 87 | 97 | ✓ | |
| The Field | ||||||||||||
| 6 | Florida International | 4–4 | +0.0 | 4.1 | 3 | 14 | 37 | 66 | 87 | 97 | ✓ | |
| 7 | Missouri State | 4–4 | -0.7 | 3.8 | 2 | 10 | 29 | 57 | 82 | 95 | 99 | |
| 8 | Middle Tennessee | 3–5 | -3.8 | 3.2 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 41 | 69 | 90 | 99 | |
| Rebuilding | ||||||||||||
| 9 | Sam Houston | 3–5 | -4.2 | 3.2 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 40 | 69 | 90 | 99 | |
| 10 | New Mexico State | 3–5 | -5.0 | 3.0 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 34 | 63 | 86 | 98 | |
Six advanced-stat dimensions per team, ranked against all 134 FBS programs, 2025 season. Every column reads higher-is-better. Click a column to sort.
| Team | Scoring | Converts | Defense | Identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberty | +0.16 | 43.1% | -0.19 | Balanced |
Jacksonville State | +0.19 | 43.9% | -0.15 | Balanced |
Western Kentucky | +0.17 | 43.4% | -0.10 | Balanced |
Delaware | +0.19 | 43.2% | -0.22 | Balanced |
Kennesaw State | +0.16 | 40.8% | -0.18 | Big-play offense |
Florida International | +0.16 | 40.8% | -0.16 | Balanced |
Missouri State | +0.17 | 39.4% | -0.24 | Big-play offense |
Middle Tennessee | +0.15 | 41.8% | -0.21 | Balanced |
Sam Houston | -0.01 | 35.5% | -0.26 | Can't sustain drives |
New Mexico State | +0.03 | 36.1% | -0.10 | Can't sustain drives |
Identity is the single dimension where a team is most above or below the FBS average (pace, defense, big plays, or converting drives) — "Balanced" means nothing stands out either way. CFBD 2025 advanced stats, excludes garbage time.
Conference USA's highest CFB Index Scores, 2025 season.
| # | Player | Team | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jakari FosterS | Louisiana Tech | #4 of 544 |
| 2 | Elijah HillEDGE | Kennesaw State | #12 of 420 |
| 3 | Damonte SmithIDL | Middle Tennessee | #9 of 330 |
| 4 | Mister ClarkCB | Florida International | #12 of 364 |
| 5 | Cam CookRB | Jacksonville State | #5 of 326 |
| 6 | Kadarion JohnsonIDL | UTEP | #11 of 330 |
| 7 | Naeten MitchellS | New Mexico State | #12 of 544 |
| 8 | Jacob FieldsS | Louisiana Tech | #17 of 544 |
| 9 | Sifa LeotaLB | Louisiana Tech | #40 of 583 |
| 10 | Walker O'SteenLB | Jacksonville State | #41 of 583 |
Conference strength by RR50 (round-robin adjusted power).
Best available American odds · sportsbook consensus.
| # | Team | Odds |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Liberty
|
+250 |
| 2 |
Western Kentucky
|
+280 |
| 3 |
Jacksonville State
|
+450 |
| 4 |
Delaware
|
+590 |
| 5 |
Kennesaw State
|
+700 |
| 6 |
Florida International
|
+820 |
| 7 |
New Mexico State
|
+1500 |
| 8 |
Missouri State
|
+1800 |
| 9 |
Middle Tennessee
|
+2500 |
| 10 |
Sam Houston
|
+5000 |