CFB Zeitgeist Score
47
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rush tds at the 80th percentile.
CharMar Brown
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
460 RUSH YDS · 7 RUSH TD · 122 CARRIES
2026 Outlook
Returning to Miami for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Running back · Miami
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Miami · Last season: 13-3 (AP #10) · Talent rank #15 · 2026 recruiting class #13
RB · MIAMI · ACC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
47
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rush tds at the 80th percentile.
Heisman Heat
Awaiting
Not on the live Heisman board this week.
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
—
TOP RB AWARD
Doak Walker
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterStarter. A locked-in starting role.
Career Arc
Heisman futures · live sportsbook odds
#20 in market ▼ from #17 · 6 books
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No recruiting profile is on file for this player. | ||
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the model places this player relative to the rest of the Heisman field.
Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
50
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
2
count
All FBS WRs, min 20 receptions
Why it matters
#302 of 531 All FBS WRs in receiving TDs — 2 TDs on 20 receptions.
Vs cohort
MODERATE · n=20 cohort 531
Signature Moment
Week 14 at Pittsburgh — 1 receiving_tds
Result W 38-7
The week the volume broke through — stacked 1 td at Pittsburgh.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the rushing totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
CharMar Brown's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Miami, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Passing-game back against FBS RB peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Rushing
Receiving
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 15 games
| Wk | Opp | CAR | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 27-24vs Notre Dame | 15 | 54 | 3.6 | 1 | 8 | |
| Wk 2 | W 45-3vs Bethune-Cookman | 7 | 35 | 5.0 | 1 | 11 | |
| Wk 3 | W 49-12vs South Florida | 9 | 22 | 2.4 | 0 | 8 | |
| Wk 4 | W 26-7vs Florida | 18 | 80 | 4.4 | 2 | 12 | Season-high 80 yds |
| Wk 6 | W 28-22@ Florida State | 8 | 19 | 2.4 | 0 | 5 | |
| Wk 8 | L 21-24vs Louisville | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 | 5 | |
| Wk 9 | W 42-7vs Stanford | 5 | 9 | 1.8 | 0 | 6 | |
| Wk 10 | L 20-26@ SMU | 9 | 37 | 4.1 | 0 | 9 | |
| Wk 11 | W 38-10vs Syracuse | 8 | 40 | 5.0 | 0 | 13 | |
| Wk 12 | W 41-7vs NC State | 8 | 45 | 5.6 | 1 | 12 | |
| Wk 13 | W 34-17@ Virginia Tech | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | 6 | |
| Wk 14 | W 38-7@ Pittsburgh | 8 | 16 | 2.0 | 0 | 7 | |
| Bowl | W 24-14@ Ohio State | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 1 | 13 | |
| Bowl | W 31-27@ Ole Miss | 14 | 54 | 3.9 | 1 | 9 | |
| Bowl | L 21-27@ Indiana | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 0 | 4 | |
| Total | 122 | 460 | 3.6 | 7 | 13 |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted rushing value. It helps separate empty volume from carries that actually move the scoreboard.
How much of the team's offense flows through this back once rushing work and receiving work are combined.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 460 | #185/735 | 75th pct | Volumevs FBS RB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 7 | #62/739 | 92nd pct | Scoringvs FBS RB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 3.8 | #534/735 | 27th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS RB |
| Receiving | Receptions | 20 | #73/552 | 87th pct | Volumevs FBS RB |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 138 | #105/548 | 81st pct | Volumevs FBS RB |
| Value | Rushing WEPA | +0.18 | #84/362 | 77th pct | Opponent-adjusted rushing value | 114 weighted playsvs FBS RB |
| Usage | Role share | 13.8% | #207/738 | 72nd pct | Share of team offensevs FBS RB |
| Rushing | Carries | 122 | #111/739 | 85th pct | Volumevs FBS RB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 13 | #513/733 | 30th pct | Metricvs FBS RB |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 22 | #198/540 | 64th pct | Metricvs FBS RB |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 6.9 | #281/548 | 49th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS RB |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 2 | #20/552 | 97th pct | Scoringvs FBS RB |
| Usage | Rush share | 23.7% | #203/738 | 73rd pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS RB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 16.2% | #206/738 | 72nd pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS RB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 15.7% | #216/738 | 71st pct | Early-down loadvs FBS RB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 13.9% | #97/738 | 87th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS RB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 11.1% | #299/738 | 60th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS RB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 6.6% | #376/738 | 49th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS RB |
| Usage | Pass share | 4.0% | #231/738 | 69th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS RB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 1 | #78/256 | 70th pct | Turnoversvs FBS RB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 15 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | YPC | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home8g | 36.8 | 3.9 | 0.6 |
| Road7g | 23.7 | 3.4 | 0.3 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | YPC | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wins12g | 34.1 | 3.8 | 0.6 |
| Losses3g | 17.0 | 2.9 | 0.0 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | YPC | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-78g | 36.9 | 3.6 | 0.8 |
| Weeks 8+7g | 23.6 | 3.7 | 0.1 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the RB cohort
Concern: long run (1st).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · RB · 2025
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Plays within the scheme — consistent production without a dominant dimension.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to LJ Johnson Jr.’s 2024 season.
LJ Johnson Jr.
Ronald Awatt
Cam Porter
Dominic Richardson
Tavierre Dunlap
Matches LJ on
Differs from LJ on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a sophomore, his production profile tracks closest to Brandon Campbell's sophomore season at Houston (2022).
Brandon Campbell
Adam Mohammed
Kirby Vorhees
Gi'Bran Payne
Jamal Roberts
Matches Brandon on
Differs from Brandon on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Mario Cristobal
Pass share
47.2%
496 pass / 554 run
Plays / game
65.6
16 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
4.1%
245 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under Mario Cristobal.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This player hasn’t appeared on a Heisman ballot tracked by the model. | |||||||||
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Miami | ACC | RB | 2 | No. 6 | 5-11 | 214 lb | Omaha, NE |