CFB Zeitgeist Score
36
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 42nd percentile.
Mikey Matthews
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
348 REC YDS · 33 REC · 2 REC TD
2026 Outlook
Returning to UCLA for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Wide receiver · UCLA
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
UCLA · Last season: 3-9 · Talent rank #26 · 2026 recruiting class #46
WR · UCLA · BIG TEN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
36
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by rec yards at the 42nd percentile.
Heisman Heat
#738
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP WR AWARD
Biletnikoff
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Development Trajectory · receiving yards
2023–2025Up 33% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4-star | 0.9095 | No. 275 recruit | HighSchool | Utah |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★☆
to Utah
Composite
0.9095
#275 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
50
Mixed Sentiment
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
Signature Story
He hasn't written his page yet — we'll start filling it in when there are enough snaps to rank against his peers.
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the receiving totals stand
To hit 700-yard receiver (currently 348): needs 176/game over remaining 2.
To hit 1,000-yard receiver (currently 348): needs 326/game over remaining 2.
To hit 60-catch season (currently 33): needs 13.5/game over remaining 2.
To hit 80-catch season (currently 33): needs 23.5/game over remaining 2.
To hit 8 receiving TDs (currently 2): needs 3/game over remaining 2.
To hit 10 receiving TDs (currently 2): needs 4/game over remaining 2.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Mikey Matthews's story is about how role and output meet each other. For UCLA, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Receiving weapon against FBS receiving peers.
2025 season snapshot | final
Receiving
Rushing
Returns
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 11 games
| Wk | Opp | REC | YDS | AVG | TD | LONG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | L 10-43vs Utah | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 | 18 | |
| Wk 2 | L 23-30@ UNLV | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 0 | 15 | |
| Wk 3 | L 10-35vs New Mexico | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 0 | 32 | Season-high 67 yds |
| Wk 6 | W 42-37vs Penn State | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 | |
| Wk 7 | W 38-13@ Michigan State | 2 | 46 | 23.0 | 0 | 37 | |
| Wk 8 | W 20-17vs Maryland | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 1 | 14 | |
| Wk 9 | L 6-56@ Indiana | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 0 | 18 | |
| Wk 11 | L 21-28vs Nebraska | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 0 | 24 | |
| Wk 12 | L 10-48@ Ohio State | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 | 8 | |
| Wk 13 | L 14-48vs Washington | 6 | 38 | 6.3 | 1 | 37 | |
| Wk 14 | L 10-29@ USC | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 0 | 21 | |
| Total | 33 | 348 | 12.0 | 2 | 37 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | UCLA | 33 | 348 | 10.5 | 2 | -- |
| 2024 | California | 34 | 292 | 8.6 | 1 | -- |
| 2023 | Utah | 29 | 261 | 9.0 | 0 | -- |
| Career | 3 loaded seasons | 96 | 901 | 9.4 | 3 | -- |
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | UCLA | 1 | 1 | 28 | 47 | -- |
| 2024 | California | 7 | 29 | -- | 67 | -- |
| 2023 | Utah | 1 | 4 | 309 | 75 | -- |
| Career | 3 loaded seasons | 9 | 34 | 337 | 189 | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
The player's share of a team's passing-game involvement. It is the fastest way to see whether the receiver is a true focal point or more of a complementary piece.
A blended workload view that accounts for catches, designed touches, and any return-game involvement that shapes the overall profile.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving | Receptions | 33 | #247/1110 | 78th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving yards | 348 | #322/1107 | 71st pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving TD | 2 | #281/1111 | 75th pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Yards / catch | 10.5 | #700/1106 | 37th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return yards | 28 | #164/238 | 32nd pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return yards | 47 | #109/224 | 52nd pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Pass share | 15.4% | #224/1137 | 80th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Carries | 1 | #264/407 | 35th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 1 | #334/346 | 4th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | 1 | #317/397 | 20th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | 1.0 | #309/393 | 22nd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 0 | #81/411 | 81st pct | Scoringvs FBS WR |
| Receiving | Receiving LONG | 37 | #499/1105 | 55th pct | Metricvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick return avg | 14.0 | #184/236 | 22nd pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt returns | 9 | #80/237 | 67th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Returns | Punt return avg | 5.2 | #161/222 | 28th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS WR |
| Returns | Kick returns | 2 | #132/243 | 46th pct | Volumevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 10.2% | #212/1137 | 81st pct | Money-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 9.4% | #278/1137 | 76th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 8.5% | #202/1137 | 82nd pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Role share | 8.0% | #214/1137 | 81st pct | Share of team offensevs FBS WR |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 7.4% | #187/1137 | 84th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS WR |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 7.1% | #229/1137 | 80th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS WR |
| Usage | Rush share | 0.3% | #332/1137 | 71st pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS WR |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 1 | #131/302 | 57th pct | Turnoversvs FBS WR |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 11 games
Home vs Road
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home6g | 2.8 | 32.3 | 11.7 | 0.3 |
| Road5g | 3.2 | 30.8 | 12.4 | 0.0 |
Win vs Loss
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins3g | 2.0 | 27.3 | 12.8 | 0.3 |
| Losses8g | 3.4 | 33.2 | 11.7 | 0.1 |
First half vs Second half
| REC/g | YDS/g | YPR | TD/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-75g | 2.6 | 34.8 | 13.6 | 0.0 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 3.3 | 29.0 | 10.7 | 0.3 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the WR cohort
Concern: rush yards (20th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Advanced Savant · WR · 2024
Advanced opponent-adjusted percentile bars are coming soon for this player.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Reliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Yusuf Ali’s 2020 season.
Yusuf Ali
Renard Bell
Mookie Cooper
Chandler Speights
Jaylon Robinson
Matches Yusuf on
Not enough data yet for this comparison.
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Drae McCray's junior season at Texas Tech (2023).
Drae McCray
Mario Williams
Semaj Morgan
Grayson Tempest
DeAngelo Irvin Jr.
Matches Drae on
Differs from Drae on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Deshaun Foster
Pass share
48.9%
358 pass / 374 run
Plays / game
61.0
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
9.3%
280 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced, slow tempo.
Coaching Lineage · 2023–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Chip Kelly → Deshaun Foster. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | California | WR3 | #738 | #832 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | ACC |
| 2023 | Utah | WR3 | #1513 | #1480 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W19 snapshot | Pac-12 |
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | UCLA | Big Ten | WR | 3 | No. 7 | 5-9 | 180 lb | Irvine, CA |
| 2024 | California | ACC | WR | 3 | No. 7 | 5-9 | 180 lb | Irvine, CA |
| 2023 | Utah | Pac-12 | WR | 3 | No. 7 | 5-9 | 180 lb | Irvine, CA |