Massachusetts

2-0

Mid-American · Joe Harasymiak, year 2 (2-12) · Warren McGuirk Alumni Stadium · 17,000 · 14,895 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#137 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #135 (-25.8) · FPI #117
The marketno line yetvs Stonehill · our model 77% Massachusetts · a number, not a pick

LastW 37–10 vs Sacred Heart · Sat Sep 12 · William Watson III 152 pass yds, 1 TD, 40 rush yds

Nextvs Stonehill · Sat Sep 19 · 3:30 pm ET · Warren McGuirk Alumni Stadium · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
37.0
Pts allowed/game
15.5
Total yards/gm#104 / 138 · 25th pct
356.0
Rush yards/gm#72 / 138 · 48th pct
176.0
Pass yards/gm#104 / 138 · 25th pct
180.0
Yards allowed/gmT-#68 / 138 · 51st pct
326.0
Rush yds allowed/gm#37 / 138 · 74th pct
86.5
SacksT-#38 / 138 · 65th pct
5
InterceptionsT-#5 / 115 · 91st pct
4
3rd-down convT-#94 / 138 · 32nd pct
35.0%
All 79 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
712356.0/gm6.91/play#104 / 138 · 25th pct#62 / 70 · 12th pct#6 / 13 · 58th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
652326.0/gm5.02/playT-#68 / 138 · 51st pctT-#49 / 70 · 30th pct#3 / 13 · 81st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
352176.0/gm3.42/play#72 / 138 · 48th pct#39 / 70 · 45th pct#3 / 13 · 81st pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
17386.5/gm1.33/play#37 / 138 · 74th pct#30 / 70 · 58th pct#1 / 13 · 96th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
6733.5/gmT-#93 / 138 · 32nd pctT-#46 / 70 · 34th pct#9 / 13 · 35th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
6733.5/gmT-#60 / 138 · 55th pctT-#41 / 70 · 41st pctT-#5 / 13 · 62nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
31.5/gmT-#77 / 138 · 34th pctT-#45 / 70 · 29th pctT-#4 / 13 · 58th pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#24 / 138 · 73rd pctT-#18 / 70 · 64th pctT-#2 / 13 · 77th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
360180.0/gm3.50/play#104 / 138 · 25th pct#61 / 70 · 14th pct#8 / 13 · 42nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
479239.5/gm3.68/play#99 / 138 · 29th pct#55 / 70 · 22nd pct#4 / 13 · 73rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
3618.0/gmT-#128 / 138 · 7th pctT-#65 / 70 · 7th pct#13 / 13 · 4th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
6331.5/gmT-#85 / 138 · 38th pctT-#45 / 70 · 36th pct#5 / 13 · 65th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
3015.0/gmT-#107 / 138 · 22nd pct#60 / 70 · 15th pctT-#10 / 13 · 23rd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3919.5/gmT-#80 / 138 · 39th pctT-#47 / 70 · 31st pctT-#3 / 13 · 77th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
42.0/gmT-#48 / 138 · 57th pctT-#33 / 70 · 46th pctT-#4 / 13 · 62nd pct#11 / 13 · 23rd pct
Opp
31.5/gmT-#75 / 138 · 36th pctT-#47 / 70 · 23rd pct#4 / 13 · 73rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating#14 / 115 · 88th pct#14 / 60 · 78th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
181.8181.8
Interceptions thrown
Team
00.0/gmT-#92 / 138 · 17th pctT-#42 / 70 · 21st pctT-#11 / 13 · 12th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
42.0/gmT-#123 / 138 · 7th pctT-#65 / 70 · 5th pct#13 / 13 · 4th pct#3 / 13 · 85th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
52.5/gmT-#38 / 138 · 65th pctT-#21 / 70 · 60th pctT-#3 / 13 · 77th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#9 / 138 · 86th pctT-#6 / 70 · 82nd pctT-#1 / 13 · 92nd pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
73.5/gmT-#111 / 138 · 16th pctT-#61 / 70 · 11th pctT-#8 / 13 · 38th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#20 / 138 · 83rd pctT-#15 / 70 · 77th pctT-#1 / 13 · 92nd pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
3216.0/gmT-#119 / 138 · 14th pctT-#64 / 70 · 9th pct#9 / 13 · 35th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3417.0/gmT-#57 / 138 · 58th pctT-#41 / 70 · 41st pct#3 / 13 · 81st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
73.5/gmT-#117 / 138 · 13th pctT-#63 / 70 · 8th pct#12 / 13 · 12th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#12 / 138 · 86th pctT-#10 / 70 · 79th pctT-#1 / 13 · 92nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
2010.0/gmT-#123 / 138 · 10th pctT-#62 / 70 · 11th pct#13 / 13 · 4th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
2412.0/gmT-#26 / 138 · 79th pctT-#11 / 70 · 83rd pct#4 / 13 · 73rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
21.0/gmT-#51 / 138 · 51st pctT-#28 / 70 · 49th pctT-#3 / 13 · 65th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gm#137 / 138 · 1st pct#70 / 70 · 1st pct#13 / 13 · 4th pct#2 / 13 · 92nd pct
4th-down att
Team
21.0/gmT-#98 / 138 · 22nd pctT-#45 / 70 · 29th pctT-#10 / 13 · 19th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
84.0/gmT-#131 / 138 · 3rd pctT-#68 / 70 · 2nd pct#13 / 13 · 4th pct#2 / 13 · 92nd pct
Time of possession
Team
61:2030:40/gm#71 / 138 · 49th pct#34 / 70 · 52nd pct#10 / 13 · 27th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
58:4029:20/gm#61 / 138 · 56th pct#34 / 70 · 52nd pct#7 / 13 · 50th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.85 EPA/play5228 / 3287.534910.94
#36 FBS
0220.492.8
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.11 EPA/play232301344.5026
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
+0.81 EPA/play12512024139
+1.25 EPA/play22610417.3149

2026 stat leaders · UMass

through 2 games

Khari Bendolph leads UMass with 14 tackles through 2 games.

1. Khari Bendolph LB 14 tackles
2. Timmy Hinspeter LB 13 tackles
3. Kendall Bournes S 13 tackles
4. Zeraun Daniel S 12 tackles
5. TJ Magee CB 11 tackles
How They Play · 2025

Massachusetts fields a struggling pass-first offense behind a porous, bend-don't-break defense.

Offense
1st pct EPA/play
Run/Pass
54% pass plays
Defense
5th pct EPA allowed
Defensive shape
92nd pct at limiting explosive plays

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · UMass · 2025

UMass reads strongest in explosive plays allowed (top 8%) and rushing epa allowed (top 75%); the crux lives in epa / play, where UMass sits at the 0th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play -0.04
1st
Success Rate +0.33
2nd
Explosive Plays +1.18
18th
Rushing EPA -0.05
3rd

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.27
5th
Success Rate Allowed +0.48
5th
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.14
92nd
Passing EPA Allowed +0.58
1st

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA -0.01
2nd
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.14
25th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 12 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · UMass · 2018–present · FBS opponents

UMass is worth +5.3 points more at home than on the road.

Top third of FBS, 69th percentile of 133 programs

12% at home, 8% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (4–28 home, 4–44 away). Interval ±3.7.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, UMass has beaten the number by −2.1 more at home than away over 73 games — inside the ±7.0 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Warren McGuirk Alumni Stadium seats 17,000 and has averaged 63% full (10,784, 24 games reported). Visitors cover a median 494 miles to get here since 2018 — 53rd-longest of 135 FBS venues, inside the ordinary range. 24% of the 2026 roster (21 of 88 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 42 home games since 2018.

Home4–28Away4–44Edge+5.3 ±3.7Visitor trip494 mi

More in this tab

Tendency driftHow this coordinator's calls have drifted since arriving.

Season by season

How UMass’s current staff calls plays, year over year

Defense: Jared Keyte (2025–2026)
1st-down pass rate
2025: 46% → 2026: 31% · 15-pt range · #46 of 203 · more than most
Red-zone pass rate
2025: 52% → 2026: 14% · 38-pt range · #3 of 200 · more than most
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Massachusetts

CFB Zeitgeist

#137

-8.3

SP+

#135

-25.8

FPI

#117

-11.2

Elo

#136

1049

The national models put Massachusetts between 117th and 136th nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is more skeptical, at 137th.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · UMass

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

63°F average kickoff temp; 6% of games had measurable precipitation; 10 mph average wind.

Based on 66 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site