Texas State

0-2

Pac-12 · G.J. Kinne, year 4 (23-18) · Bobcat Stadium (TX) · 30,000 · 22,019 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#32 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #101 (-7.8) · FPI #102
The marketTexas State by 3vs North Texas · our model 81% Texas State · a number, not a pick

LastL 26–31 vs UTSA · Sat Sep 12 · Torrance Burgess Jr. 149 rush yds, 6 rec yds

Nextvs North Texas · Sat Sep 19 · 12 pm ET · Bobcat Stadium (TX) · Texas State by 3 · series 1-0 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
16.5
Pts allowed/game
45.0
Total yards/gmT-#70 / 138 · 49th pct
415.0
Rush yards/gmT-#34 / 138 · 75th pct
225.0
Pass yards/gm#101 / 138 · 27th pct
190.0
Yards allowed/gm#123 / 138 · 11th pct
457.0
Rush yds allowed/gm#94 / 138 · 32nd pct
148.0
SacksT-#128 / 138 · 5th pct
1
InterceptionsT-#63 / 115 · 23rd pct
1
3rd-down conv#19 / 138 · 87th pct
54.8%
All 91 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
830415.0/gm5.53/playT-#70 / 138 · 49th pctT-#42 / 70 · 40th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
914457.0/gm6.35/play#123 / 138 · 11th pct#70 / 70 · 1st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
450225.0/gm3.00/playT-#34 / 138 · 75th pct#21 / 70 · 71st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
296148.0/gm2.06/play#94 / 138 · 32nd pct#60 / 70 · 15th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
9145.5/gm#23 / 138 · 84th pct#9 / 70 · 88th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
6733.5/gmT-#60 / 138 · 55th pctT-#41 / 70 · 41st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
31.5/gmT-#77 / 138 · 34th pctT-#45 / 70 · 29th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
52.5/gmT-#120 / 138 · 12th pct#68 / 70 · 4th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
380190.0/gm2.53/play#101 / 138 · 27th pct#61 / 70 · 14th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
618309.0/gm4.29/play#127 / 138 · 8th pct#68 / 70 · 4th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
5929.5/gmT-#67 / 138 · 51st pctT-#39 / 70 · 44th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
7738.5/gmT-#120 / 138 · 13th pct#62 / 70 · 12th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
3718.5/gmT-#72 / 138 · 47th pctT-#44 / 70 · 36th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
5527.5/gmT-#129 / 138 · 7th pctT-#66 / 70 · 6th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
10.5/gmT-#114 / 138 · 11th pctT-#60 / 70 · 9th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#129 / 138 · 5th pct#69 / 70 · 2nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating
Team
119.0119.0#89 / 115 · 23rd pct#50 / 60 · 18th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct
Opp
156.8156.8#81 / 91 · 12th pct#41 / 42 · 4th pct#12 / 13 · 15th pct
Interceptions thrown
Team
31.5/gmT-#8 / 138 · 89th pctT-#5 / 70 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#24 / 138 · 64th pctT-#11 / 70 · 64th pct#2 / 13 · 92nd pct
Sacks (def)
Team
10.5/gmT-#128 / 138 · 5th pctT-#68 / 70 · 2nd pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#33 / 138 · 67th pctT-#20 / 70 · 61st pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
115.5/gmT-#63 / 138 · 49th pctT-#37 / 70 · 42nd pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
94.5/gmT-#55 / 138 · 57th pctT-#36 / 70 · 45th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
4522.5/gmT-#59 / 138 · 56th pctT-#38 / 70 · 45th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
4824.0/gmT-#123 / 138 · 11th pct#68 / 70 · 4th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
178.5/gmT-#10 / 138 · 91st pctT-#5 / 70 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
147.0/gmT-#111 / 138 · 17th pctT-#60 / 70 · 12th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
3115.5/gmT-#25 / 138 · 81st pctT-#9 / 70 · 86th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3015.0/gmT-#89 / 138 · 31st pctT-#45 / 70 · 29th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
10.5/gmT-#85 / 138 · 29th pctT-#44 / 70 · 32nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
73.5/gm#138 / 138 · 1st pct#70 / 70 · 1st pct#2 / 13 · 92nd pct
4th-down att
Team
42.0/gmT-#47 / 138 · 60th pctT-#24 / 70 · 59th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
84.0/gmT-#131 / 138 · 3rd pctT-#68 / 70 · 2nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
62:0631:03/gm#64 / 138 · 54th pct#32 / 70 · 55th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
57:5428:57/gm#55 / 138 · 61st pct#32 / 70 · 55th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.54 EPA/play8232 / 5360.43426.513109.55529.34.11.9
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.40 EPA/play4229183
#31 FBS
6.3065
+0.59 EPA/play62251285.12
#43 FBS
16
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
+0.96 EPA/play22610217031
+0.45 EPA/play1211948.5122

2026 stat leaders · Texas State

through 2 games

Jayden Bradley leads Texas State with 18 tackles through 2 games.

1. Jayden Bradley DB 18 tackles
2. Ryan Nolan DB 17 tackles
3. Terrence Cooks II LB 14 tackles
4. Torrance Burgess Jr. RB 183 rushing yards
5. Craig Royal Jr. DB 11 tackles
How They Play · 2025

Texas State fields an elite run-heavy offense behind a leaky, gives up the big play defense.

Offense
94th pct EPA/play
Run/Pass
61% run plays
Defense
44th pct EPA allowed
Defensive shape
21st pct at limiting explosive plays

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Texas State · 2025

Texas State reads strongest in rushing epa (top 5%) and epa / play (top 6%); the crux lives in explosive plays allowed, where Texas State sits at the 20th percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.32
94th
Success Rate +0.47
86th
Explosive Plays +1.36
87th
Rushing EPA +0.28
96th

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.16
44th
Success Rate Allowed +0.41
54th
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.34
21st
Passing EPA Allowed +0.27
41st

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.43
86th
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.10
41st
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 13 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Texas State · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Texas State is worth +4.8 points more at home than on the road.

Middle of FBS, 64th percentile of 133 programs

44% at home, 23% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (19–24 home, 11–36 away). Interval ±4.0.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Texas State has beaten the number by +1.2 more at home than away over 72 games — inside the ±7.5 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Bobcat Stadium (TX) seats 30,000 and has averaged 70% full (21,017, 25 games reported). Visitors cover a median 583 miles to get here since 2018 — 32nd-longest of 135 FBS venues, inside the ordinary range. 11% of the 2026 roster (11 of 104 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 50 home games since 2018.

Home19–24Away11–36Edge+4.8 ±4.0Visitor trip583 mi

More in this tab

Scheme claimsFive specific, testable claims about how this team plays.

Fourth-quarter reliability, corrected

Texas State's 4th-quarter offense, before and after garbage time

Raw Q4 EPA/play ranks 37th percentile in FBS. Strip out snaps taken with a blowout margin and it climbs to the 59th — the correction is the finding, not a footnote.

league medianRaw 4th quarter · 37th pctileCompetitive snaps only · 59th pctileWorst in FBSBest in FBS
Source CFB Zeitgeist · CFBD play-by-play, garbage-time adjusted by pre-play margin
Tendency driftHow this coordinator's calls have drifted since arriving.

Season by season

How Texas State’s current staff calls plays, year over year

Offense: Landon Keopple / co-Jordan Shoemaker (2025–2026)
1st-down pass rate
2025: 41% → 2026: 33% · 7-pt range · #120 of 184 · a typical amount
Red-zone pass rate
2025: 39% → 2026: 26% · 13-pt range · #94 of 182 · a typical amount
Pass defense by zoneThe part of the field opponents keep attacking.

Pass-depth identity

What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), Texas State’s defense allows a completion rate above the FBS mean (67.3% vs 65.2% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 64-play sample) — mid-pack, 15 of 18 qualifying defenses.

We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.

Screened 59 claims, 59 survived · 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=64 short-zone plays, raw rate 71.9%
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Texas State

CFB Zeitgeist

#32

+5.2

SP+

#101

-7.8

FPI

#102

-8.2

Elo

#79

1438

The national models put Texas State between 79th and 102nd nationally — CFB Zeitgeist is higher on them than any of these models, at 32nd.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Texas State

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

Historical echoPrograms whose arc bent the same way -- then what happened.

Historical echo

Texas State’s breakout has happened before — and 1 of the 4 closest programs couldn’t hold it.

Programs whose stature climbed in the same shape. The grey line is their run; the color is what came next for them.

Wake Forest 1984–1989
held the gain
Army 2014–2019
kept climbing
Duke 1985–1990
held the gain
Eastern Michigan 1993–1998
fell back

An analogy on the shape of a program’s Zeitgeist stature arc — not a prediction. Interim calibration, medium confidence; matched among current FBS programs at a comparable level.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

78°F average kickoff temp; 12% of games had measurable precipitation; 10 mph average wind.

Based on 75 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site