Virginia Tech

2-0

ACC · James Franklin, year 1 (2-0) · Lane Stadium · 65,632 · 65,632 avg in 2026

The nationunrankedAP / Coaches
The model#42 CFB ZeitgeistSP+ #25 (+12.4) · FPI #31
The marketVirginia Tech by 3at Maryland · our model 50% Virginia Tech · a number, not a pick

LastW 44–21 vs Old Dominion · Sat Sep 12 · Mylachi Williams 2 sacks, 3.5 TFL, 4 tackles

Nextat Maryland · Sat Sep 19 · 7:30 pm ET · SECU Stadium · Virginia Tech by 3 · series 15-17, lost the last 2 · Game preview

Updated Tue Sep 15 · through week 2

Key stats — 2026 — FBS rank
Points/game
58.5
Pts allowed/game
12.0
Total yards/gm#28 / 138 · 80th pct
517.5
Rush yards/gm#70 / 138 · 50th pct
178.5
Pass yards/gm#16 / 138 · 89th pct
339.0
Yards allowed/gm#10 / 138 · 93rd pct
196.5
Rush yds allowed/gm#9 / 138 · 94th pct
59.5
Sacks#1 / 138 · 99th pct
12
InterceptionsT-#63 / 115 · 23rd pct
1
3rd-down convT-#56 / 138 · 59th pct
44.8%
All 72 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team
1035517.5/gm6.55/play#28 / 138 · 80th pct#18 / 69 · 75th pct#4 / 17 · 79th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
393196.5/gm3.64/play#10 / 138 · 93rd pct#9 / 69 · 88th pct#2 / 17 · 91st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team
357178.5/gm2.26/play#70 / 138 · 50th pct#37 / 69 · 47th pct#8 / 17 · 56th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
11959.5/gm1.10/play#9 / 138 · 94th pct#8 / 69 · 89th pct#3 / 17 · 85th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team
8241.0/gmT-#41 / 138 · 70th pctT-#21 / 69 · 70th pct#4 / 17 · 79th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
7437.0/gmT-#91 / 138 · 32nd pctT-#53 / 69 · 21st pctT-#11 / 17 · 35th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Rush TDs
Team
84.0/gmT-#9 / 138 · 91st pctT-#6 / 69 · 88th pct#2 / 17 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#24 / 138 · 73rd pctT-#18 / 69 · 64th pctT-#5 / 17 · 65th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team
678339.0/gm4.29/play#16 / 138 · 89th pct#9 / 69 · 88th pct#5 / 17 · 74th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
274137.0/gm2.54/play#19 / 138 · 87th pct#16 / 69 · 78th pct#4 / 17 · 79th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team
7638.0/gmT-#24 / 138 · 82nd pctT-#10 / 69 · 84th pctT-#3 / 17 · 82nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3417.0/gm#1 / 138 · 99th pct#1 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Completions
Team
5929.5/gmT-#9 / 138 · 93rd pctT-#3 / 69 · 96th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
189.0/gm#3 / 138 · 98th pct#3 / 69 · 96th pct#2 / 17 · 91st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Pass TDs
Team
52.5/gmT-#33 / 138 · 71st pctT-#24 / 69 · 60th pctT-#5 / 17 · 68th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#13 / 138 · 80th pctT-#11 / 69 · 72nd pctT-#4 / 17 · 76th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Passer rating#24 / 115 · 80th pct#20 / 59 · 67th pct#5 / 14 · 68th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
171.6171.6
Interceptions thrown
Team
00.0/gmT-#92 / 138 · 17th pctT-#42 / 69 · 20th pctT-#11 / 17 · 21st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
10.5/gmT-#24 / 138 · 64th pctT-#11 / 69 · 64th pctT-#4 / 17 · 53rd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Sacks (def)
Team
126.0/gm#1 / 138 · 99th pct#1 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
42.0/gmT-#74 / 138 · 37th pctT-#42 / 69 · 30th pctT-#10 / 17 · 35th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
Tackles for loss
Team
3216.0/gm#1 / 138 · 99th pct#1 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#11 / 11 · 9th pct
Opp
115.5/gmT-#81 / 138 · 34th pctT-#47 / 69 · 27th pctT-#11 / 17 · 29th pct#1 / 11 · 100th pct
First downs
Team
5628.0/gmT-#20 / 138 · 86th pctT-#13 / 69 · 81st pct#3 / 17 · 85th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
178.5/gm#3 / 138 · 98th pct#3 / 69 · 96th pct#1 / 17 · 97th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team
136.5/gmT-#37 / 138 · 68th pctT-#19 / 69 · 67th pctT-#3 / 17 · 82nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
63.0/gmT-#12 / 138 · 86th pctT-#10 / 69 · 80th pctT-#3 / 17 · 82nd pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
3rd-down att
Team
2914.5/gmT-#34 / 138 · 72nd pctT-#13 / 69 · 78th pctT-#3 / 17 · 79th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
3015.0/gmT-#89 / 138 · 31st pctT-#45 / 69 · 29th pctT-#10 / 17 · 35th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down conv
Team
42.0/gmT-#13 / 138 · 88th pctT-#7 / 69 · 88th pct#2 / 17 · 91st pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#71 / 138 · 37th pctT-#40 / 69 · 32nd pctT-#12 / 17 · 29th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
4th-down att
Team
52.5/gmT-#27 / 138 · 74th pctT-#13 / 69 · 75th pctT-#2 / 17 · 82nd pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
21.0/gmT-#20 / 138 · 74th pctT-#10 / 69 · 72nd pctT-#3 / 17 · 71st pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct
Time of possession
Team
66:5733:28/gm#35 / 138 · 75th pct#13 / 69 · 82nd pct#3 / 17 · 85th pct#13 / 13 · 8th pct
Opp
53:0326:32/gm#26 / 138 · 82nd pct#13 / 69 · 82nd pct#3 / 17 · 85th pct#1 / 13 · 100th pct

FBS rankings · 2026 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs

Player stats — 2026 season
Quarterbacks
Player#GCmp/AttPctYdsY/ATDINTRateZPRQBRAdj ANY/ASack%
+0.36 EPA/play17248 / 6277.4551
#32 FBS
8.94
#36 FBS
0173.46069.89.34.6
22211 / 1478.61279.110178.3
Running Backs
Player#GCarYdsAvgTDLongStuff%10+%
+0.66 EPA/play16223151
#59 FBS
6.62
#43 FBS
50
+0.81 EPA/play272231124.94
#5 FBS
20
Receivers
Player#GRecYdsAvgTDLong
Complete TE · +1.29 EPA/play85213158
#58 FBS
12.23
#9 FBS
21
Possession Receiver · +0.34 EPA/play3213150
#69 FBS
11.5151
255010017

2026 stat leaders · Virginia Tech

through 2 games

Ethan Grunkemeyer leads Virginia Tech with 551 passing yards through 2 games.

1. Ethan Grunkemeyer QB 551 passing yards
2. Luke Reynolds TE 158 receiving yards
3. Que'Sean Brown WR 150 receiving yards
4. Jeffrey Overton Jr. RB 151 rushing yards
5. Marcellous Hawkins RB 112 rushing yards
How They Play · 2025

Virginia Tech fields a capable offense behind a porous defense.

Offense
47th pct EPA/play
Defense
8th pct EPA allowed

Percentile vs all FBS, based on this season's per-game production. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.

The Savant Card · Virginia Tech · 2025

Virginia Tech reads strongest in rushing epa (top 20%) and explosive plays (top 49%); the crux lives in passing epa allowed, where Virginia Tech sits at the 3rd percentile.

offense · strengths lead

EPA / play +0.17
47th
Success Rate +0.41
43rd
Explosive Plays +1.26
52nd
Rushing EPA +0.18
81st

defense · higher bar = harder to play against

EPA Allowed +0.26
8th
Success Rate Allowed +0.44
22nd
Explosive Plays Allowed +1.30
31st
Passing EPA Allowed +0.48
3rd

hidden math · special situations

Passing EPA +0.16
19th
Rushing EPA Allowed +0.11
37th
Elite · 90+Strong · 70+Average · 40-70Concern · 10-40Bottom · <10
Sources · CFBD tier-2 advanced stats · per-game production · 12 games this season · percentiles vs. up to 136 FBS peers

Home-field advantage · Virginia Tech · 2018–present · FBS opponents

Virginia Tech is worth +2.7 points more at home than on the road.

Bottom third of FBS, 24th percentile of 133 programs

50% at home, 36% away against FBS opponents since 2018 (23–23 home, 15–27 away). Interval ±3.7.

95% intervalmodel 2.3 · books ~3Weakest home edge in FBSStrongest

Our model gives every stadium the same flat 2.3-point home edge — per-team modelling was tested and did not survive scrutiny (why) — and the books use about 3. Against the closing line, Virginia Tech has beaten the number by −2.9 more at home than away over 71 games — inside the ±8.0 that many games can resolve. Results here cannot tell the flat number apart from the building, and that is the honest reading of nearly every FBS stadium.

Lane Stadium seats 65,632 and has averaged 97% full (63,648, 26 games reported). Visitors get here easily: a median 224 miles trip since 2018, the 13th-shortest of 135 FBS venues. There is no travel penalty on visitors here either way. 11% of the 2026 roster (13 of 119 located players) grew up inside 100 miles of the stadium.

Edge = half the gap between average home margin and average road margin, FBS opponents only, non-neutral games since 2018; the interval is 95%. Market line: closing spread, seasons with lines on file. Trip length is straight-line miles from the visiting team's campus to the venue, measured across all 53 home games since 2018.

Home23–23Away15–27Edge+2.7 ±3.7Visitor trip224 mi

More in this tab

Pass defense by zoneThe part of the field opponents keep attacking.

Pass-depth identity

What this team throws, and gives up, by depth.

On short throws (≤19 air yards), Virginia Tech’s passing game completes a completion rate above the FBS mean (75.4% vs 68.3% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 71-play sample) — most aggressive underneath, 39 of 41 qualifying offenses.

We won’t show a deep-ball (20+ air yards) leaderboard here, on either side of the ball: even a full season of charted plays gives most teams well under 30 deep attempts — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess. Same refusal for yards-after-catch allowed and where a team’s attempts land by zone: both measured and both came back statistically indistinguishable from season-to-season noise.

Screened 59 claims, 59 survived · 2025+ only, charted plays (parse_status='complete'); n=71 short-zone plays, raw rate 83.1%
RatingsWhere the public rating systems put this team.

Model Consensus

Where the Models Rank Virginia Tech

CFB Zeitgeist

#42

+3.9

SP+

#25

+12.4

FPI

#31

+10.3

Elo

#72

1468

The national models put Virginia Tech between 25th and 72nd nationally — CFB Zeitgeist agrees, slotting them 42nd.

National rank of 138 FBS teams · 2026 season. SP+/FPI/SRS published; Elo & CFB Zeitgeist ranked by rating.

Comparable teamsPrograms built like this one — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, roster size. Not a stat match.

Most similar programs · Virginia Tech

Reads like

Matched on how the programs are built — tier, prestige band, kind of fanbase, conference, voice and roster size — not on this season's stats. A calibration, not a prediction.

ConditionsThe weather and altitude visitors have to deal with.
Venue texture

62°F average kickoff temp; 12% of games had measurable precipitation; 5 mph average wind.

Based on 78 home games with weather data.

This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site