4recruiting class
Oklahoma signed a top-15 recruiting class.
Brent Venables' top-15 class arrives as Oklahoma navigates 7 NFL exits and a Texas rivalry that signed a top-7 class — the crown still shines, but the throne is contested.
Oklahoma10-3CFP #8Latest
The read on Oklahoma depends entirely on who you ask.
belief cooled ↓ 19.9vs prior week
Fanbase belief
Mixed
47/100 · 649 mentions
~ our readGrounding
about average
6% cite a stat · 7% typical ✓ counted
~ our readVolatility
Chaotic
σ 31 pts
~ our readThe model
#22
CFB Zeitgeist · +7.9
✓ measured4Hope-Doping·Offseason
The Sooners are the seven-title program that crossed leagues and made the Playoff in year three of the SEC — then watched a 17-0 lead and the doubt they came to bury both slip away in one half against Alabama.
CFP Ranking#8 CFP
Ever since the leagues changed, the take has been that the Sooners showed up late and out of their depth; the fanbase points to a Playoff berth in year three and says the doubters got the answer, then…
offseason · quiet
Roster Reload - Oklahoma
2026 snapshot - 2026-08-06Returning Production53%Moderate continuity
Talent Composite#14 nationally247 composite 882.6
Portal Additions16Primary repair: TE
Portal Losses29Primary pressure: WR
Draft Loss7Heavy NFL Draft loss (7) — 1 with a next man up identified below
Recruiting Reload#15Top-25 recruiting class
WRin 3 - Trell Harrisout 7 - JaVonnie GibsonStarter Risk
current room: 195 lbs avg (2025 roster)
OTin 3 - E'Marion Harrisout 5 - Jake TaylorStarter Risk
TEin 3 - Jack Van Dorselaerout 2 - Carson KentUpgrade
current room: 238 lbs avg (2025 roster)
CBin 2 - Dakoda Fieldsout 3 - Gentry WilliamsDowngrade
current room: 194 lbs avg (2025 roster)
Sin 0out 3 - Kendel DolbyStarter Risk
LBin 1 - Cole Sullivanout 2 - Sammy OmosighoDowngrade
current room: 233 lbs avg (2025 roster)
Next man up
Belief EKG
WinLoss · hover for scorePrior seasonsWire eventStory arc
Approaching
30 days
until kickoff · vs UTEP · Sat Sep 5 · 00:00 UTC
The experience
Oklahoma is a crown program crossing leagues and still carrying the crown.
Offense: PoorDefense: EliteDefensive shape: Gives up the big play
Oklahoma faces roster challenges but enters 2026 with #25 recruiting class
Oklahoma returns 53% of its roster but lost seven players to the NFL draft and faces significant transfer departures. The team's #15 recruiting class offers hope for long-term improvement.
- Roster reloadOklahoma returns 53% of its roster, but lost seven players to the NFL draft and faces significant transfer departures.
- RecruitingThe team's #15 recruiting class offers hope for long-term improvement.
Data as of 2026-08-01
·
Validated against program evidence
Owen Field is quiet. Seven titles do not insulate a program from the present.
Oklahoma · the story right now
8 storylines developing
What Oklahoma's recruiting class is really about
the open questiondoes the recruiting haul translate on the field?
recruitingthis cycle~readnew
Michael Fasusi (#5 OT nationally) headlines Oklahoma's eighth straight top-20 class as Brent Venables navigates 7 NFL exits and a Texas rivalry that just signed No. 1.
what happenedOklahoma signed a top-17 recruiting class. ✓ fact
the contexteighth consecutive top-20 recruiting class
narrative tension · our read
dynastythis cycle~readnew
Oklahoma has reached elite-tier consistency — the 22-14 three-year mark raises the question of whether Venables' fourth season can sustain a top-14% power rating without a return to the national title conversation.
what happenedOklahoma has climbed into dynasty-caliber territory — into the top 14% of FBS by power rating over the last three seasons, up from the top 16% a year ago. ✓ fact
the contexta 22-14 record over the last three regular seasons
narrative tension · our read
coordinatorsthis cycle~readnew
Brent Venables begins his fourth season with a 10-3 record and a #8 AP finish, reinforcing Oklahoma's status as a crown program adapting to the SEC's demands.
what happenedOklahoma: coordinator change reshaping a unit. ✓ fact
narrative tension · our read
program_outlookthis cycle~readnew
Oklahoma jumped 19 spots in SP+ — the gap between the ranking and its 10-3 record is the story Brent Venables has to answer in Big 12 this year.
what happenedOklahoma enters 2026 rated No. 14 in 2025 SP+ (+18.3), up 19 spots from 2024. ✓ fact
narrative tension · our read
recruitingthis cycle~readnew
Brent Venables' top-15 class arrives as Oklahoma navigates 7 NFL exits and a Texas rivalry that signed a top-7 class — the crown still shines, but the throne is contested.
what happenedOklahoma signed a top-15 recruiting class. ✓ fact
the contexteighth consecutive top-20 recruiting class
narrative tension · our read
dynastythis cycle~readnew
Oklahoma has slipped from elite-tier consistency — the first time below the top-14% tier since 2024, and the market projects 7.5 wins, raising questions about whether Venables' system can reset.
what happenedOklahoma has slipped from dynasty-caliber territory — down to the top 16% of FBS by three-year power rating, from the top 14%. ✓ fact
the contexta 26-10 record over the last three regular seasons
narrative tension · our read
deep threatthis cycle~attributednew
Jaren Kanak is used almost exclusively underneath -- a low share of his targets are downfield shots.
narrative tension · our read
coordinatorsthis cycle~readnew
Brent Venables begins his fifth season with a 10-3 record, but the crown program's uneasy fanbase questions if the SEC move can sustain elite-tier consistency.
what happenedOklahoma: coordinator change reshaping a unit. ✓ fact
narrative tension · our read
How past storylines here turned out
ReplacedOklahoma's defensive coordinator spot turned over again the following season. See who's next →
AnsweredOklahoma's climb into dynasty-caliber territory didn't last — it slipped back out.
ReplacedOklahoma's offensive coordinator spot turned over again the following season. See who's next →
AnsweredOklahoma climbed back into dynasty-caliber territory the following season.
The Offseason Ledger · Oklahoma
6 verified updates · portal · recruiting · staff · news- News
Eligibility ruling impacts Oklahoma players
The five-for-five ruling buys Venables a critical bridge year — seven starters drafted and a WR room under pressure means every extra snap of eligibility is real depth, not just paperwork.
- News
Oklahoma wing Tae Davis granted fifth year of eligibility
Class of 2022 ruling lands perfectly for a WR room already sweating seven draft departures — Davis staying means Venables has a veteran body where the pressure was loudest.
- News
Owen Heinecke cleared to play
Seven drafted off last year's roster and the WR room already drawing heat — Heinecke's clearance is a quiet depth win Venables needed before fall camp pressure got louder.
- Recruiting
Jaiden Fields commits to Oklahoma
Seven draft departures carved real holes in this roster, and the WR room felt the pressure most — Fields is Venables patching a spot where the class needed a playmaker, not just a body.
- Recruiting
Bode Sparrow commits to Oklahoma
Seven starters gone to the NFL and the WR room still needs playmakers — Sparrow's athleticism profile adds the kind of versatility Venables can deploy before the SEC era gets real.
- Recruiting
Four-star ATH Bode Sparrow commits to Oklahoma
Seven starters gone to the draft and the WR room under pressure — Sparrow's athleticism gives Venables a Swiss-army option who can stress a secondary before the formation is even set.
Transfer portal snapshot
-9.2 net portal points
(raw ledger: -46.8 — unweighted, no position adjustment)WR-13.0
starter risk
S-10.7
starter risk
OT-6.7
starter risk
LB-4.4
TE+4.0
RB-3.9
CB-3.8
QB-3.6
low confidence
DL-3.4
EDGE-1.4
IOL+0.1
Top 3 commits
2026 class
★★★★☆
Jake Kreul
#73 national
★★★★☆
Jonathan Hatton Jr.
#82 national
Blue-chip pedigree, profiling early as a prototypical running back — 10 of his 25 closest recruiting profiles since 2018 shared the Balanced Back archetype.~our read · projection from recruiting profile — no college snaps yet
★★★★☆
Bowe Bentley
#89 national
Blue-chip pedigree, profiling early as a prototypical quarterback — 12 of his 25 closest recruiting profiles since 2018 shared the Pocket Passer archetype.~our read · projection from recruiting profile — no college snaps yet
↓
Fan confidence lower than any point since 2021
7th percentile among FBS programs
Fan vs. market↓
7th
Fan percentile
(FBS mood rank)
(FBS mood rank)
7.5
Vegas O/U wins
(60th among FBS)
(60th among FBS)
Market 53pp more optimistic than fan mood
Win total consensus · 3 books
Market outlook
Season expectations
Win total3 booksO/U 7.5
CFP championship#13 in field+2200
SEC title#7 in market+900
Sportsbook consensus · best odds across multiple books · 2026-08-06
Oklahoma · Next-Season Outcome Band
Oklahoma · Next-Season Outcome BandFloor / Base / Ceiling
Floor 7-6
Base 10-3
Ceiling 12-2
floor7-6Bowl game.
base10-3Bowl game.
ceiling12-2Conference title + cFP first round.
Final-season-aware projection: floor / base / ceiling include conference title and CFP games where the model supports them, so a ceiling can exceed a 12-game regular season.
How the room reacted
Following now · Oklahoma · Recruiting Confidence
Oklahoma signed the top-17 class. Talent in the door isn't the same as talent on the field.
Oklahoma signed a top-17 recruiting class. It is eighth consecutive top-20 recruiting class. A class ranked in the teens won the trail competition. The depth-chart work starts now. The bulls are loud — the coverage treats this class as a program-level statement.
near-unanimous belief
where the takes land · dot = how loud
DOUBTBELIEF
Believers20 bull takes
💬 fans: 5% volume · negative overall
Developing5 new this week
todayLoaded 2028 class in state of Arizona has national appeal — On3
yesterdayNorman schools cancel classes due to OU football season opener — News 9
yesterdayNorman public schools cancel class for OU football’s home opener — KFOR
5 days agoEligibility ruling impacts Oklahoma players — Reported
6 days agoOklahoma wing Tae Davis granted fifth year of eligibility — Official
The cast who's driving the story · latest headline on each, attributed
Alabama Predicted Recruit
“Oklahoma's Recruiting Success in Alabama Predicted to Continue” — sports.yahoo.com · 2026-08-02
CFB Zeitgeist Read · our take
Michael Fasusi (#5 OT nationally) headlines Oklahoma's eighth straight top-20 class as Brent Venables navigates 7 NFL exits and a Texas rivalry that just signed No. 1.
Next · what to watch
The obvious read is 'more talent.' The non-obvious one: a big class intensifies the depth-chart squeeze, which is itself a portal pressure the signing-day headline never mentions. Watch attrition and portal balance once camp opens — early enrollees and portal departures will tell you which of these names actually stick.
Source of record: Oklahoma signed a top-17 recruiting class — eighth consecutive top-20 recruiting class.
How each room is reacting — tap to expand
📣Believers20 bullish/recruiting items -- the case it's working.›
The optimistic read: the class is real, the program is a destination again.
“Loaded 2028 class in state of Arizona has national appeal”
On3 · 2026-08-06 · read ↗
“Norman schools cancel classes due to OU football season opener”
News 9 · 2026-08-05 · read ↗
“Norman public schools cancel class for OU football’s home opener”
KFOR · 2026-08-05 · read ↗
🧐SkepticsNo prominent dissent — the coverage runs one way.›
The 'rankings don't tell the whole story' counter -- development gaps, position holes still open.
Nothing in our corpus yet — this door stays open for when there is.
💬The boards5% of recent board volume — quieter than the headlines. Board mood this week: negative overall · anger notable (78%).›
This event was in 48 of 1021 board posts (5%) over the last 60 days — engaged but not consumed. Fan text shown verbatim, attributed to the community not the individual poster.
"Hello, I am currently a rising senior, and my GPA by graduation will hover around a 3.4 unweighted. I know this is not the best GPA, and I’m extremely concerned on whether this wil"
r/sooners ~ fan take
"As a national merit scholar I heard students get priority class registration. Anyone know where to find those dates for when priority enrollment opens?"
r/sooners ~ fan take
Board health this week (667 posts): 15% positive · 47% neutral · 38% negative. Team-level weekly mood — not specific to this event. The boards ≠ the fanbase: a self-selected vocal slice.
Following now · Oklahoma · Program power Confidence
The arrow is pointing up for Oklahoma — the data backs it.
Oklahoma has climbed into dynasty-caliber territory — into the top 14% of FBS by power rating over the last three seasons, up from the top 16% a year ago. It is a 22-14 record over the last three regular seasons. Three-year power ratings tell a structural story — the room is split on whether the schedule will confirm it.
bullish — but with real dissent
where the takes land · dot = how loud
DOUBTBELIEF
Skeptics1 doubt take
Believers6 bull takes
Developing2 new this week
5 days agoEligibility ruling impacts Oklahoma players — Reported
6 days agoOklahoma wing Tae Davis granted fifth year of eligibility — Official
2 weeks agoOwen Heinecke cleared to play — Reported
4 weeks agoJaiden Fields commits to Oklahoma — Official
4 weeks agoTomorrow may mark the nation's 250th year of existence, but today is a milestone of equal importance... — r/CFB
CFB Zeitgeist Read · our take
Oklahoma has reached elite-tier consistency — the 22-14 three-year mark raises the question of whether Venables' fourth season can sustain a top-14% power rating without a return to the national title conversation.
Next · what to watch
The non-obvious consequence of climbing the power tiers is the expectation tax: the same season that looked like a breakout last year now reads as a disappointment. Watch whether the schedule lets the run actually show up on the field.
Source of record: Oklahoma has climbed into dynasty-caliber territory — into the top 14% of FBS by power rating over the last three seasons, up from the top 16% a year ago — a 22-14 record over the last three regular seasons.
How each room is reacting — tap to expand
📣Believers6 bullish/momentum items -- the case it's working.›
The 'resurgence is real' read: the numbers are starting to back the hype.
“What Position Could Push the Sooners Toward Elite Success?”
On3 · 2026-08-05 · read ↗
“Oklahoma Adds Enhanced Pregame Tailgate Options for 2026 Football Season”
Sports Illustrated · 2026-08-05 · read ↗
“Norman schools cancel classes due to OU football season opener”
News 9 · 2026-08-05 · read ↗
🧐Skeptics“College Football Coaches Poll: USA Today ranks teams with toughe” — the real counter.›
The 'wait and see' counter -- power shifts often get overread before the season proves them.
“College Football Coaches Poll: USA Today ranks teams with toughest schedules based on Top 25”
On3 · 2026-08-05 · read ↗
Recent Form · last 10 games
Warming
Four of five. The board favors this trend.
Streak L1Last 5 · 4-1Last 10 · 7-3
The forecast
Opens Sep 5
vs UTEP · at home
Season line7.5 winsover -145
PoorEliteGives up the big play
✓ fact on line · ~ our read on style
Rival pulse
Oklahoma State
Mixed+2
Bedlam
Fan mood index · most recent r/cfb data
Recruiting Footprint · 2026
Recruiting Footprint · 2026
25
TX · 6FL · 5CA · 3AZ · 2IN · 2AL · 1AR · 1CO · 1+4 more
TX leads the 2026 class with 6 commits. National footprint reaching 12 states.
Where they recruit · 2023-2026
100 signees across 26 states, 2023-2026. TX leads the pull.
Recruiting & portal buzz
2028 4* QB Trey Tagliaferri commits to Oklahoma
2027 4* WR Bode Sparrow commits to Oklahoma
Top r/cfb community posts · last 12 months
Voter spread
66 of 66 AP voters have them ranked, final AP ballot (2025) — from #9, Kevin Carter (CBS Sports), to #15, Damien Sordelett (The Roanoke Times).
Individual AP Top 25 ballots, final AP ballot, 2025 — 66 voters tracked.
National spotlight
12 games with TV coverage: 9 national broadcast, 1 ESPN, 2 conference network
Kickoff windows: 4 noon, 5 afternoon, 3 primetime
Fumble luck
36% recovery rate on the fumbles they've forced — below the ~49% league baseline.
4 of 11 forced fumbles recovered; 6 of 10 own fumbles recovered themselves, 2025 only.
Takeaway conversion
18% of tipped/broken-up passes have turned into picks — about the ~19% league average.
9 interceptions of 51 disrupted passes (42 deflected, 9 intercepted), 2025 only.
Penalty battle
88 penalties committed, 58 drawn on opponents — ceding 326 yards of field position.
795 penalty yards committed vs. 469 drawn on opponents, 2025 season total.
The Pulse on Oklahoma
47
Δ -19.9 vs last wk
649
mentions this week · conversation velocity
What moved it — fall camp · last 14 days
Camp
Fall camp open — install + scrimmage cycle
ongoing
Kickoff
Season opener in 16 days
kickoff
"OU DNA."
— Oklahoma fanbase · recurring line
Fanbase Signals
Cohort Divergence9 pctSpread between sub-fanbase cohorts in the Pulse window.
The Fever Year
Position = mood · width = volume · color = the kind of feeling
Inside the fanbase — all 12 corners
Cr/CFB
GGoogle News
LLocked On
FFootball Brainiacs
CCampus paper
BBluesky
YYouTube
The split, staged
Warmest corner+0.00
Local
most bought-in cohort our read
vs
Coldest corner−0.00
Bettors
most skeptical cohort our read
How Oklahoma fans actually talk real · top-upvoted
The crowd’s loudest take by upvotes — read for mood, not as a side. The cohort read is the measured part.
Loudest in the room this week real · by engagement
All 12 corners of the fanbase
skeptical
buying in
Local+0.06
Bettors−0.17
Cohort sentiment is a source-weighted model read — never a quote pinned to a person.
What this fanbase keeps coming back to our read · topic model
Topics are model-labeled from Reddit — a rough signal of what this fanbase is circling right now.
1088 mentions · 7 sources · week 2026-01. Counts, sources and the divergence rank are measured (fact). Cohort labels and sentiment are a source-weighted model read (our read) — never a quote attributed to a person.
Belief checkmiddle of the pack
~ our readOklahoma fans are down on the program, and they're backing it with about as much hard evidence as anyone.
backed by facts
the mood
✓ counted We read 667 posts from Oklahoma fans this week.
Red River Rivalry
Fan mood across the 2025 season, both sides — our read
Hover a week for both sides’ game
Shaded weeks show whose fanbase read warmer, our measure of what fans actually said, not a poll.
What fans are saying
Fan claims · every quote verified verbatim
job securityWidely held among fans that season
fans believe Brent Venables is underperforming and should be replaced
Hi Joel! Could you please let us know your opinion of the pressure on Brett Venables at Oklahoma University? I don't live in OK anymore, but I've got to think that the fans there are putting him in the "it's time" category. What do you think?
Venables at # 8 is an absolute disgrace!!!! Oklahoma had arguably the hardest schedule in college football last year and they made the playoffs!!!! What an absolute joke. He's definitely not at the top, but 8 is just stupid!!!
Based on 2 comments from 2 posters across 2 threads · Jul 16, 2026–Jul 27, 2026 · via Josh Pate's College Football Show, The Joel Klatt Show: A College Football Podcast
recruiting effortLimited signal that season
fans believe JJF is a terrible assistant coach
JJF is a football terrorist, every time we would put a TE out there to block it was either penalty or a loss of yards because they can't block for shit.
JJF is the worst assistant in Oklahoma history. Our starting TE is a converted LB because he can't recruit for shit and he's an AWFUL developmental coach.
Based on 2 comments from 2 posters across 2 threads · Aug 30, 2025–Nov 16, 2025 · via CFB
player performanceLimited signal that season
fans believe the QB-WR connection is more reliable
The QB/WR connection looks much better, we will probably win more because those look good.
Based on 2 comments from 2 posters across 2 threads · Aug 31, 2025 · via CFB
scheme identityLimited signal that season
fans believe Oklahoma's offense is consistently strong but the defense is often unreliable
The offense had carried OU all year, and while the defense was holding their own in the 4th quarter and OT, that wasn’t the time to start trusting the defense.
Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Jul 30, 2026 · via CFB
fan moraleWidely held among fans
fans believe Bob Stoops was a great coach
Bob Stoops is obviously beloved. There was a time though from like 2010-2014 where he was definitely under appreciated.
Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Jul 29, 2026 · via CFB
Show all 12
injury availabilityWidely held among fans that season
fans believe mateer's injury reduced the team's ability to score points
I think for OU it will really depend on if we have a run game or not. Without one we were too easy to defend against and it was made worse once mateer got hurt.
Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Jul 28, 2026 · via CFB
scheme identityWidely held among fans that season
fans believe Brent has transformed OU's defense and improved the team's overall performance
We somehow stumbled into a baseball natty out of the (very needed) investment into the baseball program and Brent has OU playing smash mouth defense and winning games after fixing the roster.
Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Jul 22, 2026 · via CFB
fan moraleLimited signal that season
fans believe Oklahoma's defense in 2018 was among the worst in the country
2017-2018. Absolutely elite offenses with bottom 5 in the country defenses. Although 2017 I think was a better team overall with Baker at the helm (the Rose Bowl is one of the only OU games I can't rewatch) the 2018 offense with Kyler actually put up some better numbers. The defense was just even worse.
Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Jul 20, 2026 · via CFB
coaching decisionLimited signal that season
fans argue Brent Venables has underperformed expectations
I really don't understand how to look at Brent Venables coaching tenure here so far. Half of me wants him fired for some of the horse shit presented in this game and the season, but then you see the moments of excellence that shines through the shit.
Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Nov 2, 2025 · via CFB
coaching decisionLimited signal that season
fans think better defensive coaching would have helped him win more
If we had this defense and the Riley era offense, we could have realistically won four in a row from 2015-2018 with Baker and Kyler.
Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Oct 5, 2025 · via CFB
player performanceLimited signal that season
fans think Jackson Arnold struggles under pressure
Your giants at OL against our DL will tell the tale of how the game will go. If we can shut down your running game and make Arnold throw, it will be a long day.
Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Sep 13, 2025 · via CFB
scheme identityLimited signal that season
fans believe Brent Venables excels at designing defensive schemes
Love seeing Venables calling the defense. He's so good at it.
Based on 1 comment from 1 poster across 1 thread · Aug 31, 2025 · via CFB
Season storylines
Week 2
“This defense is the real deal. And Mateer looks good too, now bring on Jackson Arnold!”— r/CFB
Week 10
“Well I don't center my thoughts and feelings on how my football team does outside of the game. And I certainly don't let talking heads dictate my feelings. You should try that”— r/CFB
Week 7
“Fire those refs into the sun, holy shit... GG Cocks. Nothing against you guys, y'all were pretty cool in the game thread”— r/CFB
Week 8
“Legitimately I think you have to fire Lebby after that. That game was literally unloseable.”— r/CFB
Week 6
“Kansas and Missouri fought a war, with actual deaths and burning of cities. Oklahoma and Texas fought over a bridge, and Oklahoma won without firing a shot.”— r/CFB
Five Lenses
What people are saying right now
Radio, beat writers & editorial5 posts
News & campus coverage7 posts
Rent free · r/cfb fan posts, last season
Oklahoma lives rent-free in
- Texas8%
- Texas Tech8%
- Florida5%
share of each rival fanbase’s football posts that bring up Oklahoma
Fanbase Health Index · Oklahoma · high confidence
Fanbase Health Index · Oklahoma · high confidenceGrowing (71)
DecliningStableGrowingSurging
On-Field — 10-3 (77% win rate)78
Volume — 2871 effective signal-N99
Cohort Engagement — Divergence 0.09 — quiet35
From the booth
Fanbase Voice
762 fan mentions
Doomers
vs the 28 highest-volume fanbases - 2026 season
Season Vocabulary
2026NIL
nildamenotre damenotrecollegenfl
This is kind of what I’d assume would need to happen, but also this would spread nil VERY thin.
2025DEFENSE
defenseoffensefieldlinemateeryards
Hawai'i defense: "fine, I'll do it myself"
2024OFFENSE
offenseoffensivetransfer portalportalsoonerstransfer
Our entire offense is ass so theres that
Words of the season
how the conversation changed, year to year
2026
nil×4.9dame×6.5notre dame×6.5notre×5.7college×3.3
2025
defense×2.9offense×3.0field×3.6line×2.6mateer×3.4
2024
offense×2.2offensive×4.4transfer portal×13.4portal×2.4sooners×12.5
Your Vocabulary Clustercamp / fall camp / fall
campfall campfall
with 19 other fanbasesKey stats — 2025 — FBS rank
Points/game#74 / 138 · 47th pct26.2
Pts allowed/game#6 / 138 · 96th pct15.5
Total yards/gm#85 / 136 · 38th pct354.5
Rush yards/gm#107 / 136 · 22nd pct118.7
Pass yards/gm#57 / 136 · 59th pct235.8
Yards allowed/gm#3 / 136 · 99th pct272.8
Rush yds allowed/gm#2 / 136 · 99th pct77.5
Sacks#3 / 136 · 99th pct45
Interceptions#68 / 136 · 51st pct9
3rd-down conv#84 / 136 · 39th pct38.6%
All 98 stats
Offense / Defense
Total yards
Team4609354.5/gm5.33/play#85 / 136 · 38th pct#47 / 69 · 33rd pct#11 / 16 · 38th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct
Opp3546272.8/gm4.31/play#3 / 136 · 99th pct#2 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Rush yards
Team1543118.7/gm1.79/play#107 / 136 · 22nd pct#54 / 69 · 23rd pct#14 / 16 · 19th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct
Opp100877.5/gm1.22/play#2 / 136 · 99th pct#2 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Rush carries
Team43333.3/gm#78 / 136 · 43rd pct#36 / 69 · 49th pct#9 / 16 · 50th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct
Opp41632.0/gm#24 / 136 · 83rd pct#19 / 69 · 74th pct#5 / 16 · 75th pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
Rush TDs
Team181.4/gm#79 / 136 · 43rd pct#46 / 69 · 35th pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct
Opp70.5/gm#3 / 136 · 99th pct#3 / 69 · 97th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Net pass yards
Team3066235.8/gm3.55/play#57 / 136 · 59th pct#34 / 69 · 52nd pct#10 / 16 · 44th pct#10 / 12 · 25th pct
Opp2538195.2/gm3.08/play#35 / 136 · 75th pct#18 / 69 · 75th pct#3 / 16 · 88th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Pass attempts
Team43133.2/gm#38 / 136 · 73rd pct#20 / 69 · 72nd pct#5 / 16 · 75th pct#4 / 12 · 75th pct
Opp40731.3/gm#85 / 136 · 38th pct#41 / 69 · 42nd pct#10 / 16 · 44th pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
Completions
Team26520.4/gm#49 / 136 · 65th pct#28 / 69 · 61st pct#7 / 16 · 62nd pct#7 / 12 · 50th pct
Opp24018.5/gm#71 / 136 · 49th pct#30 / 69 · 58th pct#9 / 16 · 50th pct#4 / 12 · 75th pct
Pass TDs
Team171.3/gm#82 / 136 · 40th pct#47 / 69 · 33rd pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct#10 / 12 · 25th pct
Opp110.8/gm#7 / 136 · 96th pct#6 / 69 · 93rd pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Passer rating
Team130.1130.1#78 / 136 · 43rd pct#45 / 69 · 36th pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct#10 / 12 · 25th pct
Opp114.9114.9#17 / 136 · 88th pct#10 / 69 · 87th pct#3 / 16 · 88th pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
Interceptions thrown
Team110.8/gm#41 / 136 · 71st pct#16 / 69 · 78th pct#4 / 16 · 81st pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
Opp90.7/gm#54 / 136 · 61st pct#27 / 69 · 62nd pct#5 / 16 · 75th pct#4 / 12 · 75th pct
Sacks (def)
Team453.5/gm#3 / 136 · 99th pct#3 / 69 · 97th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 10 · 100th pct
Opp302.3/gm#107 / 136 · 22nd pct#53 / 69 · 25th pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct#7 / 10 · 40th pct
Tackles for loss
Team1239.5/gm#2 / 136 · 99th pct#2 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#2 / 10 · 90th pct
Opp735.6/gm#98 / 136 · 29th pct#54 / 69 · 23rd pct#10 / 16 · 44th pct#6 / 10 · 50th pct
First downs
Team24118.5/gm#95 / 136 · 31st pct#50 / 69 · 29th pct#13 / 16 · 25th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct
Opp19414.9/gm#3 / 136 · 99th pct#2 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
3rd-down conv
Team715.5/gm#54 / 136 · 61st pct#26 / 69 · 64th pct#7 / 16 · 62nd pct#8 / 12 · 42nd pct
Opp534.1/gm#6 / 136 · 96th pct#3 / 69 · 97th pct#2 / 16 · 94th pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
3rd-down att
Team18414.2/gm#32 / 136 · 77th pct#12 / 69 · 84th pct#4 / 16 · 81st pct#3 / 12 · 83rd pct
Opp18914.5/gm#111 / 136 · 19th pct#57 / 69 · 19th pct#13 / 16 · 25th pct#4 / 12 · 75th pct
4th-down conv
Team80.6/gm#116 / 136 · 15th pct#62 / 69 · 12th pct#14 / 16 · 19th pct#9 / 12 · 33rd pct
Opp110.8/gm#32 / 136 · 77th pct#14 / 69 · 81st pct#6 / 16 · 69th pct#4 / 12 · 75th pct
4th-down att
Team141.1/gm#130 / 136 · 5th pct#65 / 69 · 7th pct#15 / 16 · 12th pct#9 / 12 · 33rd pct
Opp241.8/gm#57 / 136 · 59th pct#27 / 69 · 62nd pct#11 / 16 · 38th pct#5 / 12 · 67th pct
Time of possession
Team386:3629:44/gm#60 / 136 · 57th pct#31 / 69 · 57th pct#8 / 16 · 56th pct#7 / 12 · 50th pct
Opp393:2430:16/gm#94 / 136 · 32nd pct#48 / 69 · 32nd pct#11 / 16 · 38th pct#5 / 12 · 67th pct
Kicking & Punting
Field goals#22 / 135 · 84th pct24/28 (85.7%)
Extra points35/35
Punting#20 / 136 · 86th pct45.8 avg · 62 punts
Turnovers & special teams
Turnovers
Team161.2/gm#65 / 136 · 53rd pct#26 / 69 · 64th pct#7 / 16 · 62nd pct#7 / 12 · 50th pct
Opp131.0/gm#32 / 136 · 77th pct#18 / 69 · 75th pct#4 / 16 · 81st pct#3 / 12 · 83rd pct
Fumbles lost
Team50.4/gm#91 / 136 · 34th pct#41 / 69 · 42nd pct#10 / 16 · 44th pct#10 / 12 · 25th pct
Opp40.3/gm#19 / 136 · 87th pct#11 / 69 · 86th pct#3 / 16 · 88th pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
INT return TDs
Team10.1/gm#36 / 135 · 74th pct#19 / 69 · 74th pct#5 / 16 · 75th pct#6 / 11 · 55th pct
Opp10.1/gm#61 / 136 · 56th pct#30 / 69 · 58th pct#8 / 16 · 56th pct#6 / 11 · 55th pct
INT return yards
Team17713.6/gm#34 / 136 · 76th pct#18 / 69 · 75th pct#6 / 16 · 69th pct#6 / 12 · 58th pct
Opp16212.5/gm#100 / 136 · 27th pct#51 / 69 · 28th pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct#10 / 12 · 25th pct
Punt ret yds
Team25519.6/gm#21 / 136 · 85th pct#15 / 69 · 80th pct#4 / 16 · 81st pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
Opp25219.4/gm#123 / 136 · 10th pct#62 / 69 · 12th pct#15 / 16 · 12th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct
Punt ret TDs
Team00.0/gm#43 / 135 · 69th pct#23 / 69 · 68th pct#7 / 16 · 62nd pct#5 / 10 · 60th pct
Opp10.1/gm#97 / 135 · 29th pct#52 / 69 · 26th pct#11 / 16 · 38th pct#7 / 10 · 40th pct
Kick ret yds
Team171.3/gm#136 / 136 · 1st pct#69 / 69 · 1st pct#16 / 16 · 6th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct
Opp36928.4/gm#60 / 136 · 57th pct#38 / 69 · 46th pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
Kick ret TDs
Team00.0/gm#40 / 136 · 71st pct#17 / 69 · 77th pct#4 / 16 · 81st pct#3 / 9 · 78th pct
Opp00.0/gm#1 / 135 · 100th pct#1 / 69 · 100th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 10 · 100th pct
Penalty yards
Team79561.2/gm#28 / 136 · 80th pct#13 / 69 · 83rd pct#4 / 16 · 81st pct#5 / 12 · 67th pct
Opp46936.1/gm#8 / 136 · 95th pct#6 / 69 · 93rd pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Other
H2 epa per play opponent#6 / 143 · 96th pct#4 / 69 · 96th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct0.00.0
H1 epa per play opponent#10 / 167 · 95th pct#6 / 69 · 93rd pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct0.10.0/gm
Fumbles rec (def)#13 / 136 · 91st pct#9 / 69 · 88th pct#2 / 16 · 94th pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct40.3/gm
Penalties (opp)#13 / 136 · 91st pct#8 / 69 · 90th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct584.5/gm
Recruiting rating#17 / 138 · 88th pct#17 / 69 · 77th pct#10 / 16 · 44th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct248.619.1/gm
Punt returns#36 / 136 · 74th pct#21 / 69 · 71st pct#6 / 16 · 69th pct#5 / 12 · 67th pct201.5/gm
Penalties#37 / 136 · 74th pct#20 / 69 · 72nd pct#8 / 16 · 56th pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct886.8/gm
Interceptions (def)#68 / 136 · 51st pct#35 / 69 · 51st pct#10 / 16 · 44th pct#7 / 12 · 50th pct90.7/gm
Kick ret (opp)#71 / 136 · 49th pct#44 / 69 · 38th pct#11 / 16 · 38th pct#4 / 12 · 75th pct211.6/gm
Passes intercepted opponent#82 / 136 · 40th pct#48 / 69 · 32nd pct#10 / 16 · 44th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct110.8/gm
H1 epa per play#85 / 162 · 48th pct#49 / 69 · 30th pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct0.20.0/gm
Fumbles recovered#109 / 136 · 21st pct#57 / 69 · 19th pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct#10 / 12 · 25th pct40.3/gm
Red zone pass rate#119 / 154 · 23rd pct#56 / 69 · 20th pct#11 / 16 · 38th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct0.30.0/gm
H2 epa per play#127 / 142 · 11th pct#64 / 69 · 9th pct#14 / 16 · 19th pct0.10.0/gm
Punt ret (opp)#132 / 136 · 4th pct#67 / 69 · 4th pct#16 / 16 · 6th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct272.1/gm
Fourth down go rate#136 / 138 · 2nd pct#68 / 69 · 3rd pct#16 / 16 · 6th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct0.20.0/gm
Kick returns#136 / 136 · 1st pct#69 / 69 · 1st pct#16 / 16 · 6th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct40.3/gm
First down pass rate#138 / 215 · 36th pct#52 / 69 · 26th pct#14 / 16 · 19th pct#6 / 12 · 58th pct0.40.0/gm
Situational
3rd-down conversion
Off38.6%#84 / 136 · 39th pct#48 / 69 · 32nd pct#13 / 16 · 25th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct
Def28.0%#3 / 136 · 99th pct#3 / 69 · 97th pct#2 / 16 · 94th pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
4th-down conversion
Off57.1%#52 / 136 · 62nd pct#32 / 69 · 55th pct#8 / 16 · 56th pct#7 / 12 · 50th pct
Def45.8%#37 / 136 · 74th pct#18 / 69 · 75th pct#5 / 16 · 75th pct#3 / 12 · 83rd pct
Turnover margin#86 / 136 · 38th pct#46 / 69 · 35th pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct#10 / 12 · 25th pct-0.23/gm
Sack rate (def)#2 / 136 · 99th pct#2 / 69 · 99th pct#2 / 16 · 94th pct#1 / 10 · 100th pct11.1%
Red Zone & Drive Efficiency (2014– , play-by-play derived)
Red zone trips
Team332.5/gm#118 / 167 · 30th pct#62 / 69 · 12th pct#15 / 16 · 12th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct
Opp282.2/gm#39 / 166 · 77th pct#7 / 69 · 91st pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Red zone score %
Team100.0%100.0%#1 / 167 · 100th pct#1 / 69 · 100th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Opp75.0%75.0%#53 / 166 · 69th pct#22 / 69 · 70th pct#4 / 16 · 81st pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Points / drive
Team1.90.1/gm#79 / 167 · 53rd pct#47 / 69 · 33rd pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct
Opp1.00.1/gm#6 / 166 · 97th pct#4 / 69 · 96th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Yards / drive
Team40.23.1/gm#86 / 167 · 49th pct#50 / 69 · 29th pct#13 / 16 · 25th pct#9 / 12 · 33rd pct
Opp352.7/gm#21 / 166 · 88th pct#13 / 69 · 83rd pct#5 / 16 · 75th pct#4 / 12 · 75th pct
Plays / drive
Team6.30.5/gm#119 / 167 · 29th pct#60 / 69 · 14th pct#15 / 16 · 12th pct#6 / 12 · 58th pct
Opp6.40.5/gm#50 / 166 · 70th pct#17 / 69 · 77th pct#5 / 16 · 75th pct#8 / 12 · 42nd pct
Three-and-out rate
Team13.6%13.6%#84 / 167 · 50th pct#44 / 69 · 38th pct#10 / 16 · 44th pct#3 / 12 · 83rd pct
Opp24.5%24.5%#5 / 166 · 98th pct#2 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct
Scheme Identity (2014– , play-by-play derived)
Rush rate over expected#106 / 145 · 28th pct#50 / 69 · 29th pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct-4.0%-4.0%
Havoc rate
Team23.1%23.1%#3 / 140 · 99th pct#3 / 69 · 97th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct
Opp16.6%16.6%#96 / 140 · 32nd pct#48 / 69 · 32nd pct#10 / 16 · 44th pct
Standard-downs success
Team46.6%46.6%#92 / 154 · 41st pct#51 / 69 · 28th pct#13 / 16 · 25th pct
Opp36.5%36.5%#2 / 172 · 99th pct#1 / 69 · 100th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct
Passing-downs success
Team29.3%29.3%#89 / 153 · 42nd pct#48 / 69 · 32nd pct#12 / 16 · 31st pct
Opp25.8%25.8%#18 / 149 · 89th pct#11 / 69 · 86th pct#3 / 16 · 88th pct
Line yards / carry
Team2.72.7#108 / 143 · 25th pct#54 / 69 · 23rd pct#13 / 16 · 25th pct
Opp2.02.0#2 / 155 · 99th pct#2 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct
Stuff rate
Team22.2%22.2%#124 / 143 · 14th pct#63 / 69 · 10th pct#15 / 16 · 12th pct
Opp29.5%29.5%#4 / 155 · 98th pct#2 / 69 · 99th pct#1 / 16 · 100th pct
Power success rate
Team63.3%63.3%#107 / 137 · 23rd pct#57 / 69 · 19th pct#13 / 16 · 25th pct
Opp64.7%64.7%#41 / 141 · 72nd pct#19 / 69 · 74th pct#5 / 16 · 75th pct
Efficiency
Completion %
Off61.5%#75 / 136 · 46th pct#46 / 69 · 35th pct#11 / 16 · 38th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct
Def59.0%#30 / 136 · 79th pct#13 / 69 · 83rd pct#4 / 16 · 81st pct#6 / 12 · 58th pct
Yards / attempt
Off7.1#72 / 136 · 48th pct#43 / 69 · 39th pct#11 / 16 · 38th pct#10 / 12 · 25th pct
Def6.2#22 / 136 · 85th pct#14 / 69 · 81st pct#3 / 16 · 88th pct#2 / 12 · 92nd pct
Yards / completion
Off11.6#72 / 136 · 48th pct#41 / 69 · 42nd pct#9 / 16 · 50th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct
Def10.6#26 / 136 · 82nd pct#21 / 69 · 71st pct#4 / 16 · 81st pct#1 / 12 · 100th pct
Yards / carry#121 / 136 · 12th pct#60 / 69 · 14th pct#14 / 16 · 19th pct#12 / 12 · 8th pct3.6
Yards / play#98 / 136 · 29th pct#55 / 69 · 22nd pct#14 / 16 · 19th pct#11 / 12 · 17th pct5.33
Scoring margin#29 / 136 · 79th pct#22 / 69 · 70th pct#7 / 16 · 62nd pct#9 / 12 · 33rd pct+10.8/gm
FBS rankings · 2025 season · all stats vs 136 FBS programs
Player stats — 2025 season
Quarterbacks
| Player | # | G | Cmp/Att | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | INT | Rate | QBR | Adj ANY/A | Sack% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pocket Passer · +0.25 EPA/play | 10 | 12 | 247 / 397 | 62.2 | 2885 #44 FBS | 7.3 | 14 | 11 | 129.4 | 67.6 | 6.0 | 5.9 | |
Yards by week → Pocket PasserBalanced passer who operates within the system, without one standout number carrying the profile. Watch-list name — on at least one major award watch list, no hardware yet — trending, not yet confirmed. The most common profile in its group this season — 97 of 183 classified this way. Played in 12 of 21 games this season · junior Aura Tax — perception-vs-production gap across 4 tracked snapshots, 343 mentions | |||||||||||||
| +0.23 EPA/play | 3 | 2 | 15 / 27 | 55.6 | 167 | 6.2 | 3 | 0 | 144.2 | 43 | — | — | |
Yards by week → | |||||||||||||
Running Backs
| Player | # | G | Car | Yds | Avg | TD | Long | 3rd Dn Use | Pass Dn Use | Stuff% | 10+% | Tgt Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced Back · -0.03 EPA/play | 6 | 12 | 120 | 482 | 4.0 | 4 | 25 | 10.5 | 9.1 | 21.8 | 14.3 | 5.1% (19/371) | |
Yards by week → Balanced BackPlays within the scheme — consistent production without a dominant dimension. Starter — over 60% of the snaps, holding the job. 186 of 349 RBs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Yards / carry5.0 bottom 14th percentile · FBS RBs, min. 40 carries Yards / reception5.9 bottom 30th percentile · FBS RBs, min. 40 carries Trait fingerprint Plays like View Tory Blaylock's full player page | |||||||||||||
| Workhorse · +0.14 EPA/play | 24 | 10 | 83 | 421 | 5.1 | 4 | 65 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 7.4 | 6.2 | 5.1% (19/371) | |
Yards by week → Workhorse· Boom-or-bustBuilt to take 20+ carries per game. Volume is the value. his yards come in chunks — feast or famine Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 52 of 349 RBs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Weight239 lb 99th percentile · FBS RBs, min. 40 carries Yards / carry6.4 76th percentile · FBS RBs, min. 40 carries Trait fingerprint View Xavier Robinson's full player page | |||||||||||||
| +0.19 EPA/play | — | 5 | 21 | 68 | 3.2 | 0 | 12 | 2.9 | 4.7 | — | — | — | |
Yards by week → | |||||||||||||
Receivers
| Player | # | G | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Long | 3rd Dn Use | Pass Dn Use | Tgt Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slot Technician · +0.57 EPA/play | 5 | 12 | 65 | 949 #29 FBS | 14.6 | 8 #23 FBS | 87 | 18.1 | 16.4 | 25.3% (94/371) | |
Yards by week → Slot Technician· Boom-or-bustRuns precise routes in tight quarters. Volume player who keeps chains moving. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. The rare part: the passing game runs through him — and every touch moves the offense, too 97 of 558 WRs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Reception volume65 95th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions Total EPA (college ability)51.4 96th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions — the part the label misses Trait fingerprint Plays like our readSustained Ascent: his CFB Index score shows two real climbs in a row — 5th to 54th to 94th percentile among FBS WRs | |||||||||||
| Slot Technician · +0.30 EPA/play | 4 | 13 | 57 | 620 | 10.9 | 4 | 45 | 5.3 | 9.3 | 22.1% (82/371) | |
Yards by week → Slot TechnicianRuns precise routes in tight quarters. Volume player who keeps chains moving. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 97 of 558 WRs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Reception volume57 89th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions EPA / play (adj)0.3 bottom 22th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions Trait fingerprint Plays like our readBounce-Back: his CFB Index score shows a real arc: 80th percentile among FBS WRs, fell to 32nd, now back up to 77th | |||||||||||
| Complete TE · +0.70 EPA/play | 12 | 13 | 44 | 533 | 12.1 | 0 | 48 | 7.0 | 8 | 14.6% (54/371) | |
Yards by week → Complete TENo single go-to route — the receiving numbers show up inline and split out alike. 177 of 223 TEs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Yards / reception13.2 73th percentile · FBS TEs, min. 8 receptions Reception volume44 97th percentile · FBS TEs, min. 8 receptions Trait fingerprint Plays like View Jaren Kanak's full player page | |||||||||||
| Possession Receiver · +0.44 EPA/play | 9 | 7 | 21 | 243 | 11.6 | 2 | 28 | 7.7 | 7.4 | 8.4% (31/371) | |
Yards by week → Possession ReceiverReliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive. The most common profile in its group this season — 332 of 558 classified this way. Played in 7 of 21 games this season · senior View Keontez Lewis's full player page | |||||||||||
| Possession Receiver · +0.55 EPA/play | 11 | 9 | 18 | 199 | 11.1 | 1 | 38 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 7.3% (27/371) | |
Yards by week → Possession Receiver· Money-downReliable target who converts on critical downs. Not flashy; consistently productive. lives on the sticks and moves the chains 332 of 558 WRs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Yards / reception13.1 bottom 47th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions Reception volume18 bottom 18th percentile · FBS WRs, min. 12 receptions Trait fingerprint Plays like View JaVonnie Gibson's full player page | |||||||||||
| +0.78 EPA/play | 84 | 4 | 9 | 101 | 11.2 | 0 | 22 | 3.3 | 4.9 | — | |
Yards by week → | |||||||||||
| +0.93 EPA/play | 18 | 5 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 16 | 2.6 | 2.6 | — | |
Yards by week → | |||||||||||
Defensive Line
| Player | # | G | Tot | Solo | TFL | Sack | Hur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nose Anchor | — | 13 | 43 | 16 | 8 | 1.5 | 6 |
Nose AnchorThe heaviest frame on the interior. Sack production is intentionally not the point of this profile. Starter — over 60% of the snaps, holding the job. 152 of 809 IDLs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Weight310 lb 83th percentile · FBS interior linemen, min. 10 tackles Plays like our readBreakout: his CFB Index score climbed from the 5th percentile to the 75th among FBS IDLs | |||||||
| 3-Tech Penetrator | 44 | 13 | 39 | 22 | 15 #21 FBS | 7 #39 FBS | 6 |
3-Tech PenetratorDisruptive interior rusher who lives in the backfield. Starter — over 60% of the snaps, holding the job. 269 of 809 IDLs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt TFL rate38.5% 99th percentile · FBS interior linemen, min. 10 tackles Plays like View Taylor Wein's full player page | |||||||
| 3-Tech Penetrator | 56 | 13 | 33 | 11 | 7 | 3.5 | 7 |
3-Tech PenetratorDisruptive interior rusher who lives in the backfield. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 269 of 809 IDLs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt TFL rate21.2% 75th percentile · FBS interior linemen, min. 10 tackles Plays like View Gracen Halton's full player page | |||||||
| Two-Gap Base | 65 | 11 | 28 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
Two-Gap BaseStout at the point of attack — steady tackle-for-loss production without a standout pass-rush number. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 388 of 809 IDLs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt TFL rate17.9% 63th percentile · FBS interior linemen, min. 10 tackles Plays like our readFading: his CFB Index score moved from the 87th to 62nd percentile among FBS IDLs | |||||||
| Nose Anchor | 52 | 11 | 27 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
Nose AnchorThe heaviest frame on the interior. Sack production is intentionally not the point of this profile. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 152 of 809 IDLs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Weight323 lb 92th percentile · FBS interior linemen, min. 10 tackles Plays like View Damonic Williams's full player page | |||||||
| 3-Tech Penetrator | 32 | 9 | 26 | 18 | 9.5 | 6.5 #55 FBS | 3 |
3-Tech PenetratorDisruptive interior rusher who lives in the backfield. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 269 of 809 IDLs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt TFL rate36.5% 99th percentile · FBS interior linemen, min. 10 tackles Plays like our readFading: his CFB Index score now sits at the 71st percentile among FBS IDLs, up from the 98th | |||||||
| 3-Tech Penetrator | 8 | 11 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
3-Tech PenetratorDisruptive interior rusher who lives in the backfield. 269 of 809 IDLs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt TFL rate25.0% 86th percentile · FBS interior linemen, min. 10 tackles Plays like View Marvin Jones Jr.'s full player page | |||||||
| 3-Tech Penetrator | 34 | 7 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
3-Tech PenetratorDisruptive interior rusher who lives in the backfield. 269 of 809 IDLs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt TFL rate26.7% 90th percentile · FBS interior linemen, min. 10 tackles Plays like View Adepoju Adebawore's full player page | |||||||
| 99 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
| 16 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
Linebackers
| Player | # | G | Tot | Solo | Ast | TFL | Sack | PD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage 'Backer | 10 | 13 | 76 | 38 | 38 | 10.5 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Coverage 'BackerCarries tight ends and patrols the middle of the field in coverage. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 99 of 660 LBs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt PD rate5.3% 83th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles Tackle volume76 82th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles Trait fingerprint Plays like our readSustained Ascent: his CFB Index score shows two real climbs in a row — 42nd to 69th to 90th percentile among FBS LBs | |||||||||
| Coverage 'Backer | 38 | 13 | 74 | 34 | 40 | 12 #51 FBS | 3 | 4 | 0 |
Coverage 'BackerCarries tight ends and patrols the middle of the field in coverage. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 99 of 660 LBs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt PD rate5.4% 84th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles TFL rate16.2% 83th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles Trait fingerprint Plays like our readUnranked recruit — top-quartile production against his own recruiting profile our readBreakout: his CFB Index score climbed from the 0th percentile to the 87th among FBS LBs | |||||||||
| Thumper | 5 | 13 | 54 | 29 | 25 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
ThumperDownhill striker who fills the run lane and blitzes off the edge. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 97 of 660 LBs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt TFL rate18.5% 90th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles PD rate5.6% 85th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles Trait fingerprint Plays like our readFading: his CFB Index score climbed from the 96th percentile to the 63rd among FBS LBs | |||||||||
| Coverage 'Backer | 7 | 13 | 50 | 28 | 22 | 4.5 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Coverage 'BackerCarries tight ends and patrols the middle of the field in coverage. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 99 of 660 LBs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt PD rate6.0% 89th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles Sack rate4.0% 55th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles Trait fingerprint Plays like our readSustained Ascent: his CFB Index score shows two real climbs in a row — 0th to 31st to 62nd percentile among FBS LBs | |||||||||
| Thumper | 11 | 10 | 32 | 12 | 20 | 6.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
ThumperDownhill striker who fills the run lane and blitzes off the edge. 97 of 660 LBs we've classified this way this season. Season receipt TFL rate20.3% 94th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles PD rate0.0% bottom 18th percentile · FBS linebackers, min. 15 tackles Trait fingerprint Plays like View Kobie McKinzie's full player page | |||||||||
| 17 | 5 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | |
Defensive Backs
| Player | # | G | Tot | PD | INT | TFL | Sack |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Safety | 3 | 13 | 59 | 2 | 1 | 1.5 | 0 |
Box SafetyLives near the line of scrimmage as a de facto extra linebacker. Starter — over 60% of the snaps, holding the job. 166 of 801 Ss we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Tackle volume59 79th percentile · FBS safeties, min. 15 tackles Plays like View Robert Spears-Jennings's full player page | |||||||
| Centerfielder | 22 | 12 | 46 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
CenterfielderSingle-high range who erases the deep middle of the field. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 133 of 801 Ss we've classified this way this season. Season receipt PD rate15.2% 83th percentile · FBS safeties, min. 15 tackles Plays like our readUnranked recruit — top-quartile production against his own recruiting profile our readReinvented: changed shape entirely — Hybrid Nickel to Centerfielder, his CFB Index score now sits at the 84th percentile among FBS Ss, up from the 12th | |||||||
| Centerfielder | 4 | 13 | 41 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
CenterfielderSingle-high range who erases the deep middle of the field. Part-time starter — splitting the role or filling in on injury. 133 of 801 Ss we've classified this way this season. Season receipt View Courtland Guillory's full player pagePD rate17.1% 89th percentile · FBS safeties, min. 15 tackles | |||||||
| Hybrid Nickel | 13 | 11 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 2.5 | 1 |
Hybrid NickelMoves between deep coverage and the slot — the modern positionless DB. 419 of 801 Ss we've classified this way this season. Season receipt PD rate3.2% bottom 26th percentile · FBS safeties, min. 15 tackles Plays like View Reggie Powers III's full player page | |||||||
| Box Safety | 25 | 12 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 1 |
Box SafetyLives near the line of scrimmage as a de facto extra linebacker. 166 of 801 Ss we've classified this way this season. Season receipt Tackle volume31 bottom 30th percentile · FBS safeties, min. 15 tackles Plays like our readAscending: his CFB Index score went from the 0th percentile among FBS Ss to the 20th | |||||||
| Centerfielder | 23 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Centerfielder· Takeaway threatSingle-high range who erases the deep middle of the field. the kind of DB who takes it back the other way 133 of 801 Ss we've classified this way this season. Season receipt PD rate12.5% 73th percentile · FBS safeties, min. 15 tackles Plays like View Eli Bowen's full player page | |||||||
| 12 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 1 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 9 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 19 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 15 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
Kicking
| Player | # | G | FG M/A | FG% | XP M/A | Pts | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weapon | 29 | 13 | 24/27 | 88.9 | 35/35 | 107 | 55 |
| 95 | 1 | 0/1 | 0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 |
Punt Returns
| Player | # | G | No | Yds | Avg | TD | Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slot Technician · +0.57 EPA/play | 5 | 12 | 20 | 255 | 12.8 | 0 | 43 |
2025 stat leaders
final
2025 stat leaders
1.
Isaiah Sategna
WR
949 yds (rec)
2.
Kip Lewis
LB
76.0 tot (def)
3.
Owen Heinecke
LB
74.0 tot (def)
4.
John Mateer
QB
2,885 yds (pass)
5.
Samuel Omosigho
LB
50.0 tot (def)
Roster
2025
25
players carry a qualified CFB Index Score this season.
Taylor Wein
EDGE
#13 of 420
Isaiah Sategna
WR
#36 of 485
Jaren Kanak
TE
#14 of 156
Kip Lewis
LB
#65 of 583
Owen Heinecke
LB
#84 of 583
Peyton Bowen
CB
#73 of 364
+19 more
Oklahoma · 2025 schedule & results10-3Brutal slateAverage opponent win rate 59% · 9 AP top-25 opponents on the schedule. 5 ranked wins banked (time-of-game rank).
| Wk | Date | Us | Opp | Line | Opponent | Result | Record | Conf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aug 30 | #26 | #138 | -38.5 | Illinois State | W 35–3 115 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
| 2 | Sep 6 | #29 | #17 | -3.5 | MichiganTop 25 win | W 24–13 130 | 2-0 | 0-0 |
| 3 | Sep 13 | #18 | #73 | -24.5 | @Temple | W 42–3 132 | 3-0 | 0-0 |
| 4 | Sep 20 | #12 | #41 | -6.5 | AuburnTop 25 win | W 24–17 128 | 4-0 | 1-0 |
| 6 | Oct 4 | #17 | #257 | -46.5 | Kent State | W 44–0 120 | 5-0 | 1-0 |
| 7 | Oct 11 | #18 | #9 | +2.5 | Texas (N) | L 6–23 128 | 5-1 | 1-1 |
| 8 | Oct 18 | #22 | #31 | -4 | @South Carolina | W 26–7 134 | 6-1 | 2-1 |
| 9 | Oct 25 | #13 | #21 | -5.5 | Ole Miss | L 26–34 147 | 6-2 | 2-2 |
| 10 | Nov 1 | #21 | #14 | +3 | @TennesseeTop 25 win | W 33–27 144 | 7-2 | 3-2 |
| 12 | Nov 15 | #19 | #7 | +6.5 | @AlabamaTop 10 win | W 23–21 126 | 8-2 | 4-2 |
| 13 | Nov 22 | #19 | #21 | -4.5 | MissouriTop 25 win | W 17–6 133 | 9-2 | 5-2 |
| 14 | Nov 29 | #19 | #34 | -11.5 | LSU | W 17–13 121 | 10-2 | 6-2 |
| College Football Playoff | ||||||||
| 17 | Dec 20 | #19 | #11 | -2.5 | Alabama | L 24–34 | 10-3 | 6-3 |
Advanced box score (EPA, success rate, explosiveness)▼
| Date | Opp | Result | Yds | TO | TOP | EPA/play | Success% | Explosive% | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20 | Alabama | L 24–34 | — | — | — | -0.006 | 31.2% | 143.2% | |
| Nov 29 | LSU | W 17–13 | 393 | 3 | 30:41 | +0.028 | 30.4% | 170.8% | Most explosive |
| Nov 22 | Missouri | W 17–6 | 276 | 0 | 27:12 | -0.038 | 29.2% | 128.3% | |
| Nov 15 | @Alabama | W 23–21 | 212 | 0 | 25:32 | -0.055 | 27.8% | 140.7% | One-score win |
| Nov 1 | @Tennessee | W 33–27 | 351 | 2 | 30:07 | +0.005 | 45.6% | 95.7% | One-score win |
| Oct 25 | Ole Miss | L 26–34 | 359 | 1 | 24:24 | +0.085 | 33.3% | 168.3% | Defense's roughest night |
| Oct 18 | @South Carolina | W 26–7 | 319 | 0 | 33:38 | +0.146 | 43.9% | 97.2% | |
| Oct 11 | Texas | L 6–23 | 258 | 3 | 29:02 | -0.063 | 34.8% | 121.9% | Season-low EPA/play |
| Oct 4 | Kent State | W 44–0 | 355 | 0 | 31:02 | +0.203 | 52.2% | 102.6% | Best defensive stand |
| Sep 20 | Auburn | W 24–17 | 306 | 1 | 24:26 | +0.062 | 41.9% | 115.3% | One-score win |
| Sep 13 | @Temple | W 42–3 | 515 | 1 | 32:16 | +0.268 | 53.2% | 117.8% | Best success rate |
| Sep 6 | Michigan | W 24–13 | 408 | 2 | 32:12 | +0.211 | 45.9% | 118.8% | |
| Aug 30 | Illinois State | W 35–3 | 495 | 2 | 32:56 | +0.479 | 50.7% | 140.0% | Season-high EPA/play |
| Season average (13 games) | 354 | 1.2 | +0.102 | 40.0% | 127.7% | ||||
How They Play · 2025
How They Play · 2025Oklahoma fields a struggling offense behind an elite, gives up the big play defense.
Opponent-adjusted percentiles vs all FBS. Bar = where this team ranks — right is better.
Team identity · competitive snaps only
How Oklahoma actually scores
20th percentile quality, 80th percentile boom-dependency. Garbage time excluded from both axes — the same correction that changes the Q4 story below.
View all FBS teams as a table
| Team | Quality percentile | Boom-share percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Air Force | 86th | 11th |
| Akron | 12th | 89th |
| Alabama | 58th | 17th |
| App State | 35th | 47th |
| Arizona | 64th | 37th |
| Arizona State | 41st | 62nd |
| Arkansas | 90th | 12th |
| Arkansas State | 17th | 66th |
| Army | 57th | 43rd |
| Auburn | 47th | 53rd |
| BYU | 78th | 19th |
| Baylor | 69th | 25th |
| Boise State | 66th | 20th |
| Boston College | 37th | 54th |
| Bowling Green | 2nd | 98th |
| Buffalo | 11th | 88th |
| California | 28th | 48th |
| Central Michigan | 52nd | 64th |
| Cincinnati | 89th | 16th |
| Clemson | 51st | 48th |
| Coastal Carolina | 17th | 83rd |
| Colorado | 18th | 84th |
| Colorado State | 16th | 83rd |
| Delaware | 38th | 58th |
| Duke | 80th | 14th |
| East Carolina | 63rd | 36th |
| Eastern Michigan | 49th | 42nd |
| Florida | 30th | 67th |
| Florida Atlantic | 62nd | 59th |
| Florida International | 42nd | 50th |
| Florida State | 83rd | 32nd |
| Fresno State | 26th | 73rd |
| Georgia | 81st | 3rd |
| Georgia Southern | 73rd | 21st |
| Georgia State | 36th | 70th |
| Georgia Tech | 84th | 5th |
| Hawai'i | 64th | 41st |
| Houston | 27th | 65th |
| Illinois | 75th | 26th |
| Indiana | 95th | 1st |
| Iowa | 44th | 40th |
| Iowa State | 68th | 22nd |
| Jacksonville State | 54th | 38th |
| James Madison | 65th | 44th |
| Kansas | 85th | 28th |
| Kansas State | 71st | 49th |
| Kennesaw State | 56th | 30th |
| Kent State | 21st | 86th |
| Kentucky | 15th | 85th |
| LSU | 14th | 81st |
| Liberty | 43rd | 56th |
| Louisiana | 19th | 73rd |
| Louisiana Tech | 39th | 61st |
| Louisville | 48th | 64th |
| Marshall | 55th | 39th |
| Maryland | 30th | 74th |
| Memphis | 80th | 24th |
| Miami | 76th | 5th |
| Miami (OH) | 34th | 67th |
| Michigan | 67th | 33rd |
| Michigan State | 27th | 75th |
| Middle Tennessee | 39th | 52nd |
| Minnesota | 29th | 77th |
| Mississippi State | 22nd | 77th |
| Missouri | 61st | 30th |
| Missouri State | 55th | 46th |
| NC State | 86th | 23rd |
| Navy | 94th | 17th |
| Nebraska | 48th | 57th |
| Nevada | 3rd | 97th |
| New Mexico | 58th | 60th |
| New Mexico State | 9th | 87th |
| North Carolina | 13th | 89th |
| North Texas | 98th | 7th |
| Northern Illinois | 8th | 92nd |
| Northwestern | 52nd | 36th |
| Notre Dame | 99th | 20th |
| Ohio | 67th | 18th |
| Ohio State | 93rd | 4th |
| Oklahoma | 20th | 80th |
| Oklahoma State | 5th | 95th |
| Old Dominion | 83rd | 45th |
| Ole Miss | 89th | 2nd |
| Oregon | 91st | 10th |
| Oregon State | 2nd | 98th |
| Penn State | 73rd | 33rd |
| Pittsburgh | 60th | 39th |
| Purdue | 25th | 78th |
| Rice | 6th | 94th |
| Rutgers | 70th | 27th |
| SMU | 74th | 42nd |
| Sam Houston | 4th | 96th |
| San Diego State | 24th | 76th |
| San José State | 45th | 69th |
| South Alabama | 36th | 58th |
| South Carolina | 23rd | 86th |
| South Florida | 87th | 23rd |
| Southern Miss | 40th | 55th |
| Stanford | 10th | 90th |
| Syracuse | 5th | 95th |
| TCU | 72nd | 35th |
| Temple | 70th | 34th |
| Tennessee | 96th | 11th |
| Texas | 45th | 55th |
| Texas A&M | 82nd | 14th |
| Texas State | 92nd | 8th |
| Texas Tech | 77th | 31st |
| Toledo | 50th | 61st |
| Troy | 14th | 80th |
| Tulane | 79th | 15th |
| Tulsa | 20th | 70th |
| UAB | 61st | 45th |
| UCF | 33rd | 82nd |
| UCLA | 23rd | 79th |
| UConn | 95th | 13th |
| UL Monroe | 11th | 92nd |
| UNLV | 88th | 9th |
| USC | 98th | 2nd |
| UTEP | 1st | 99th |
| UTSA | 77th | 51st |
| Utah | 97th | 6th |
| Utah State | 46th | 63rd |
| Vanderbilt | 100th | 0th |
| Virginia | 59th | 27th |
| Virginia Tech | 32nd | 71st |
| Wake Forest | 42nd | 72nd |
| Washington | 92nd | 8th |
| Washington State | 33rd | 52nd |
| West Virginia | 7th | 93rd |
| Western Kentucky | 53rd | 29th |
| Western Michigan | 31st | 68th |
| Wisconsin | 0th | 100th |
| Wyoming | 8th | 91st |
Fourth-quarter reliability, corrected
Oklahoma's 4th-quarter offense, before and after garbage time
Raw Q4 EPA/play ranks 9th percentile in FBS. Strip out snaps taken with a blowout margin and it climbs to the 10th — the correction is the finding, not a footnote.
Standard downs vs. passing downs
Does Oklahoma hold up once the down-and-distance turns against them?
39th percentile success on standard downs, 41st on passing downs — little dropoff between the two — a schedule-independent identity.
View all FBS teams as a table
| Team | Standard-downs percentile | Passing-downs percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Air Force | 82nd | 69th |
| Akron | 20th | 36th |
| Alabama | 47th | 76th |
| App State | 41st | 80th |
| Arizona | 54th | 54th |
| Arizona State | 40th | 37th |
| Arkansas | 90th | 97th |
| Arkansas State | 51st | 40th |
| Army | 37th | 44th |
| Auburn | 73rd | 24th |
| Austin Peay | 56th | 13th |
| BYU | 91st | 46th |
| Ball State | 5th | 3rd |
| Baylor | 70th | 77th |
| Boise State | 42nd | 63rd |
| Boston College | 56th | 54th |
| Bowling Green | 10th | 17th |
| Bryant | 7th | 2nd |
| Buffalo | 29th | 20th |
| California | 25th | 66th |
| Central Michigan | 57th | 11th |
| Charlotte | 7th | 7th |
| Cincinnati | 89th | 65th |
| Clemson | 49th | 34th |
| Coastal Carolina | 16th | 22nd |
| Colorado | 8th | 48th |
| Colorado State | 29th | 35th |
| Delaware | 66th | 31st |
| Duke | 82nd | 63rd |
| East Carolina | 63rd | 91st |
| Eastern Michigan | 46th | 67th |
| Florida | 52nd | 45th |
| Florida Atlantic | 44th | 61st |
| Florida International | 50th | 26th |
| Florida State | 65th | 90th |
| Fresno State | 22nd | 71st |
| Georgia | 95th | 69th |
| Georgia Southern | 64th | 84th |
| Georgia State | 22nd | 75th |
| Georgia Tech | 92nd | 89th |
| Hawai'i | 33rd | 87th |
| Houston | 61st | 29th |
| Idaho | 30th | 78th |
| Idaho State | 93rd | 14th |
| Illinois | 79th | 95th |
| Indiana | 97th | 98th |
| Iowa | 74th | 19th |
| Iowa State | 80th | 58th |
| Jacksonville State | 59th | 56th |
| James Madison | 77th | 52nd |
| Kansas | 99th | 82nd |
| Kansas State | 37th | 59th |
| Kennesaw State | 44th | 67th |
| Kent State | 15th | 5th |
| Kentucky | 62nd | 29th |
| LSU | 18th | 52nd |
| Lafayette | 0th | 12th |
| Liberty | 65th | 53rd |
| Lindenwood | 4th | 1st |
| Long Island University | 24th | 78th |
| Louisiana | 24th | 23rd |
| Louisiana Tech | 41st | 24th |
| Louisville | 84th | 32nd |
| Maine | 3rd | 18th |
| Marshall | 71st | 62nd |
| Maryland | 11th | 86th |
| Massachusetts | 5th | 9th |
| Memphis | 75th | 68th |
| Merrimack | 1st | 83rd |
| Miami | 80th | 64th |
| Miami (OH) | 33rd | 39th |
| Michigan | 73rd | 74th |
| Michigan State | 48th | 39th |
| Middle Tennessee | 69th | 47th |
| Minnesota | 35th | 33rd |
| Mississippi State | 52nd | 35th |
| Missouri | 76th | 50th |
| Missouri State | 32nd | 50th |
| Murray State | 1st | 6th |
| NC State | 58th | 71st |
| Navy | 95th | 72nd |
| Nebraska | 78th | 51st |
| Nevada | 17th | 16th |
| New Mexico | 38th | 60th |
| New Mexico State | 16th | 33rd |
| North Carolina | 14th | 30th |
| North Texas | 100th | 97th |
| Northern Illinois | 9th | 5th |
| Northwestern | 48th | 88th |
| Notre Dame | 88th | 99th |
| Ohio | 69th | 76th |
| Ohio State | 99th | 99th |
| Oklahoma | 39th | 41st |
| Oklahoma State | 14th | 7th |
| Old Dominion | 72nd | 79th |
| Ole Miss | 83rd | 95th |
| Oregon | 93rd | 55th |
| Oregon State | 54th | 25th |
| Penn State | 76th | 73rd |
| Pittsburgh | 35th | 56th |
| Purdue | 46th | 88th |
| Rice | 20th | 0th |
| Rutgers | 71st | 84th |
| SMU | 50th | 57th |
| Sam Houston | 26th | 4th |
| San Diego State | 84th | 1st |
| San José State | 68th | 70th |
| South Alabama | 53rd | 28th |
| South Carolina | 31st | 8th |
| South Carolina State | 10th | 3rd |
| South Florida | 86th | 46th |
| Southern Miss | 27th | 38th |
| Stanford | 12th | 12th |
| Syracuse | 19th | 10th |
| TCU | 63rd | 82nd |
| Temple | 85th | 22nd |
| Tennessee | 97th | 81st |
| Texas | 27th | 61st |
| Texas A&M | 88th | 59th |
| Texas State | 60th | 93rd |
| Texas Tech | 45th | 65th |
| Toledo | 67th | 42nd |
| Troy | 18th | 27th |
| Tulane | 81st | 86th |
| Tulsa | 43rd | 43rd |
| UAB | 34th | 94th |
| UCF | 39th | 20th |
| UCLA | 28th | 48th |
| UConn | 96th | 37th |
| UL Monroe | 13th | 14th |
| UNLV | 78th | 85th |
| USC | 94th | 90th |
| UT Martin | 2nd | 41st |
| UTEP | 3rd | 10th |
| UTSA | 67th | 92nd |
| Utah | 87th | 96th |
| Utah State | 31st | 49th |
| Vanderbilt | 90th | 100th |
| Virginia | 36th | 73rd |
| Virginia Tech | 59th | 21st |
| Wake Forest | 21st | 31st |
| Washington | 98th | 93rd |
| Washington State | 61st | 44th |
| West Virginia | 12th | 18th |
| Western Kentucky | 55th | 80th |
| Western Michigan | 86th | 16th |
| Wisconsin | 6th | 27th |
| Wyoming | 23rd | 15th |
Halftime identity
Oklahoma by half
1st-half offense ranks 48th percentile in FBS; 2nd-half, 11th — competitive snaps only, garbage time excluded from both halves.
Schedule mirage
How much of Oklahoma's number is the schedule?
Raw EPA/play through week 21 is 0.10; 30th percentile once opponent strength is stripped out, it's 0.01. The widest gap came in week 1: 0.48 raw vs. 0.04 adjusted.
Oklahoma reads strongest in success rate allowed (top 1%) and epa allowed (top 2%); the crux lives in rushing epa, where Oklahoma sits at the 16th percentile.
offense · strengths lead
defense · higher bar = harder to play against
hidden math · special situations
ELITE · 90+STRONG · 70+AVERAGE · 40-70CONCERN · 10-40BOTTOM · <10
Most Similar Programs · Oklahoma
Most Similar Programs · OklahomaReads Like
AlabamaTier 1 · Similarly-sized rosters up frontClemsonTier 1 · Similarly-sized rosters up frontGeorgiaTier 1 · Similarly-sized rosters up front
Static-attribute similarity across tier, archetype, conference, and voice. Not a prediction — a calibration.
Home-Field Advantage · Oklahoma · 2018-present
Strong
86% home win rate vs 64% on the road. margin runs +12.5 better at home. Memorial Stadium (Norman, OK) seats 86,112, averaging 97% full (83,665 attendance, 27 games reported).
Home45-7Away22-12
Positional competition · RB room
The carries are split. The job isn’t.
Tory Blaylock and Xavier Robinson split the carries (118/199 vs 81/199) -- but the job isn't split the same way. Xavier Robinson produces in bigger chunks.
Tory BlaylockXavier Robinson
Carries
the baseline -- every row below is tested against this split, not a flat 50/50
Targets
shared -- dots touch, this room really is a committee here
Top-5-carry share
concentration and EPA/carry agree -- a real boom/bust split
Screened 2 claims, 1 survived, 1 falsified
Positional competition · WR/TE room
The targets are split. The job isn’t.
Isaiah Sategna (WR) and Jaren Kanak (TE) split the targets (89/142 vs 53/142) -- but the job isn't split the same way. Jaren Kanak produces in bigger chunks.
Isaiah SategnaJaren Kanak
Targets
the baseline -- every row below is tested against this split, not a flat 50/50
3rd-down targets
shared -- dots touch, this room really is a committee here
Top-5-catch share
concentration and EPA/target agree -- a real boom/bust split
Screened 2 claims, 1 survived, 1 falsified
What changed
Oklahoma’s play-calling, before and after the change
Offense: co-Joe Jon Finley / co-Kevin Johns (interim) / Seth Littrell (2024) → Ben Arbuckle (2025)
The biggest shift: red-zone pass rate moved down 7 points. The rest held closer to steady.
1st-down pass rate
Red-zone pass rate
Defense: co-Todd Bates / Zac Alley / co-Jay Valai (2024) → co-Todd Bates / co-Jay Valai (2025)
The biggest shift: red-zone pass rate moved down 7 points. The rest held closer to steady.
1st-down pass rate
Red-zone pass rate
Defensive identity · pass zones
What this defense gives up, by zone.
On short passes, Oklahoma’s defense allows a completion rate below the FBS mean (65.3% vs 65.9% league-wide, shrunk toward the mean for its 145-play sample) — mid-pack, 57 of 133 qualifying defenses.
We won’t show a deep-ball leaderboard here: at the defense level, most teams face well under 30 rich-feed deep targets all season — too thin to tell a real tendency from noise, so we won’t guess.
Screened 133 claims, 133 survived · 2025 only, in the 399 games with the detailed play-text feed; n=145 short-zone plays faced, raw rate 64.8%
Historical echo
Oklahoma’s slide has precedent — and 2 of the 4 closest kept falling.
Programs whose stature fell in the same shape. The grey line is their decline; the color is what came next for them.
Alabama 1981–1986
clawed back
Florida 2012–2017
kept sliding
Texas A&M 1957–1962
kept sliding
Syracuse 1971–1976
stayed down
An analogy on the shape of a program’s Zeitgeist stature arc — not a prediction. Interim calibration, medium confidence; matched among current FBS programs at a comparable level.
Venue texture
70°F average kickoff temp; 7% of games had measurable precipitation; 10 mph average wind.
Based on 76 home games with weather data.
The CFP Era
12 seasons inside the CFP era, no bids yet — the era the program is still trying to break into.
TRAJECTORY · quality-score line · AP rank dotted · CFP bids marked · coach regimes ribboned
Program Quality
AP Rank (inverted)
CFP Appearance
Oklahoma's 2014–2025 record is 116-39. The era is still being written; the CFP line is the one the program is arguing for.
Red River Rivalry
Golden Hat 118 meetings since 1902 See the whole history →
Heat trajectory
Week-by-week rivalry heat isn't tracked yet for this matchup — check back as the 2026-27 season approaches and real fan-intel signal accumulates.
Fan Heat Index
Who's more worked up right now
Cross-fanbase rivalry sentiment for this matchup hasn't been measured yet this week — both sides show as neutral until real signal comes in.
Oklahoma
Awaiting
Texas
Awaiting
Oklahoma
—
Texas
—
THE LAST 5 · year-by-year
- L 2025 Loss 6–23
- L 2024 Loss 3–34
- W 2023 Win 34–30
- L 2022 Loss 0–49
- W 2021 Win 55–48
All-Time Record
913-343-47
since 1902 · 124 seasons · .700 win rate
HOME
522-110-23
AWAY
343-197-23
NEUTRAL
48-36-1
1900s
1910s
1920s
1930s
1940s
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
2020s
Program résumé
7Nat'l titles
50Conf. titles
7Heismans
5CFP apps
57Bowl apps
1895Founded
The program, in full — read the essay
Oklahoma made the Playoff in year three of the SEC — the vindication the move demanded. Then the Sooners led Alabama 17-0, gave up 27 straight points, and lost 34-24. The doubt came back, wearing a different jersey.
Seven national titles and the highest winning percentage of the modern era. The 47-game winning streak Bud Wilkinson built from 1953 to 1957 is the longest in major college football history and has never been seriously threatened. Barry Switzer's wishbone dynasty. Bob Stoops' 2000 championship over Florida State. Seven Heisman winners — tied for most of any program in the sport. The Sooner Schooner, two white ponies pulling a covered wagon at 25 miles per hour around Gaylord Family Stadium after every score, the only mascot of its kind anywhere. Oklahoma is not a program that performs confidence; it carries the standard as a structural fact and organizes its public life around the conviction that it belongs at the top of the sport in whatever league it joins.
Year three of the SEC answered the first question. Brent Venables and transfer quarterback John Mateer — 2,885 passing yards, 431 rushing yards through a midseason hand injury — built a 10-3 team that returned to the 12-team Playoff, the program's first postseason appearance since the Lincoln Riley era. The 5-0 start, Ben Arbuckle's redesigned offense, the rebuild after the 6-7 2022 season that invited every 'they don't belong in this league' take: the berth itself was the answer. Then the Fiesta Bowl arrived, and Oklahoma led Alabama 17-0 in the first half and lost 34-24, dropping Venables to 0-5 in the postseason and turning a vindicating year into a half-game the fanbase cannot unsee.
Mateer returns for 2026. The program is back in the field — nobody serious disputes that after a Playoff berth in year three of the toughest league in the sport. The open question, the one the 2026 SEC schedule will adjudicate, is whether the Sooners can win the league they chose to join. The eighth title that would make the realignment look like destiny — not a gamble, not an ego play, but a coronation — requires Oklahoma to do in the SEC what it did in the Big 12: be the program everyone else measures itself against. The standard doesn't negotiate about which conference it travels through.
How they play
Crown-program-in-transition: historically tempo-driven and explosive, now reconfigured for SEC line-of-scrimmage demands. Arbuckle's system under Venables uses Mateer's dual-threat ability as the operating lever — quick-game RPO concepts, designed QB runs, and play-action off the threat of it. The defensive identity is 4-2-5 under Venables, built on speed and assignment discipline, still developing the depth required to hold leads in SEC fourth quarters. The Sooner Schooner rides after every score; the standard is still the standard.
Steady
Oklahoma 2016–2025. Holding the line. The 10-year slope (-0.15 rungs / yr) doesn't tilt either way — the program lives at roughly Tier 5.
CFP Era · Oklahoma
12 seasons on file
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
down middle peak CFP year
Season Standing · 2025 · 10-3 · CFP #8 / AP #8
Season Standing · 2025 · 10-3 · CFP #8 / AP #8Top 15
Oklahoma: Top 15 nationally. NY6-bowl conversation.
R0R1R2R3R4R5R6R7R8R9
Sub-FBSBuildingBowlRankedContenderPlayoff
SEC Standing · 2025
7th in the SEC
Oklahoma is 7th of 16 in the SEC at 6-3. The path to the title is steep — the focus is on bowl access and rivalry wins.
| # | Program | Record |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ole Miss | 8-1 |
| 2 | Alabama | 8-2 |
| 3 | Georgia | 8-2 |
| 4 | Texas A&M | 7-1 |
| 5 | Texas | 6-2 |
| 6 | Vanderbilt | 6-2 |
| 7 | Oklahoma | 6-3 |
| 8 | Missouri | 4-4 |
| 9 | Tennessee | 4-4 |
| 10 | LSU | 3-5 |
| 11 | Florida | 2-6 |
| 12 | Kentucky | 2-6 |
| 13 | Auburn | 1-7 |
| 14 | Mississippi State | 1-7 |
| 15 | South Carolina | 1-7 |
| 16 | Arkansas | 0-8 |
Coaching Era · Oklahoma
Coaching Era · OklahomaBrent Venables
Brent Venables has held the program for 5 seasons — the era is established.
Era Brent Venables · 2022–presentPrev: Bob Stoops (2021)OC: Ben ArbucklePrev OC: co-Joe Jon Finley / co-Kevin Johns (interim) / Seth Littrell (2024)DC: Todd BatesPrev DC: co-Todd Bates / co-Jay Valai (2025)
5
years · era
Rituals
Things this fanbase does every Saturday — none of them invented in the last decade.
Sooner Schooner
since 1964
The covered wagon, pulled by two white ponies named Boomer and Sooner, races across the field after every score. The schooner is a Conestoga wagon — a direct reference to the 1889 Land Rush 'Sooners' who entered Oklahoma Territory before the legal start. The 1985 Orange Bowl tipping incident is part of the lore.
Boomer Sooner (fight song)
since 1905
Written by Arthur Alden in 1905 — set to the tune of Yale's 'Boola Boola' (which OU borrowed and arguably improved). The most-played college fight song per minute of game time. The 'Oklahoma! Oklahoma! Oklahoma! Sooners!' breakdown is the signature; visiting fans learn it by osmosis.
The Crimson Walk (Sooner Walk)
since 1990s
Players walk from Switzer Center through fans into Owen Field. Less codified than Auburn's or Michigan's equivalents but central to the gameday rhythm. Bob Stoops formalized it; Lincoln Riley and Brent Venables continued. The walk passes the Heisman statues — every Oklahoma Heisman winner cast in bronze along the route.
Pride of Oklahoma (band)
since 1904
The marching band's halftime performance — distinguished by the 'Boomer Sooner' fan-tradition culminating in the script 'OKLAHOMA' formation. Less photogenic than Script Ohio but more athletic — the band's fast tempo through OU formations is its signature. Drumline solos are a fixture.
Red River Rivalry Week
since 1900
The neutral-site game vs Texas during the State Fair of Texas. The stadium is split exactly in half — crimson on one sideline, burnt orange on the other. The Golden Hat trophy goes to the winner. Calendar-marker rivalry that organizes the OU season the way The Game organizes Ohio State's.
Program memory
What this program never forgets
Most weeks vanish. These didn’t.
1957
The 47-game streak
Wilkinson's Sooners run off the longest winning streak in major college history
1985
The Switzer era
Three national titles under Barry Switzer — 1974, 1975 and 1985, the last of six Oklahoma won between 1950 and 1985
The 2000 national title
Stoops beats Florida State in the Orange Bowl for the program's seventh championship
2025
The 34-24 Playoff collapse
Oklahoma leads Alabama 17-0 in its CFP game, then loses 34-24 at home
Heartbreak
Moment of the Year · Oklahoma · 2025
Moment of the Year · Oklahoma · 2025Won 23-21 at Alabama
Week 12 of 2025. Beat a top-4 opponent on the road.
Bowl / Postseason Ledger
Bowl / Postseason LedgerRecent postseason (2014-2025): 3-9
Most recent: 2025 — loss 24-34 (home). Last 5 postseason: 1-4.
20252024202320222021
NFL Draft Pipeline
2022–2026
NFL Draft PipelineStrong
24 picks last 5 cycles. 2 first-round picks. Recruits with NFL ambitions notice.
24
picks · 2 R1
#27
Anton Harrison
Offensive Tackle · 2023 · Jacksonville
#29
Tyler Guyton
Offensive Tackle · 2024 · Dallas
#40
R Mason Thomas
Defensive Edge · 2026 · Kansas City · #171/420 final season
#12 all-time · 46 first-round picksthe talent factory →
Unit lineage
Oklahoma’s offense and defense, by coordinator
FBS-relative efficiency percentile per season (2014–2025), same population as the Coordinator Mirror board. Dashed vertical lines mark a coordinator change.
Offense2014–2025
2014 · co-Jay Norvell / co-Josh Heupel2015–2016 · Lincoln Riley2017–2021 · co-Bill Bedenbaugh / co-Cale Gundy2022–2023 · Jeff Lebby2024 · co-Joe Jon Finley / co-Kevin Johns (interim) / Seth Littrell2025 (ongoing) · Ben Arbuckle
Defense2014–2025
2014–2018 · Mike Stoops2019–2021 · Alex Grinch2022–2023 · Ted Roof / co-Todd Bates / co-Jay Valai2024 · co-Todd Bates / Zac Alley / co-Jay Valai2025 · co-Todd Bates / co-Jay Valai
Hired for 2026: Todd Bates — not yet reflected in on-field data.
Elite (≥70th pct)AveragePoor (≤30th pct)
Chronicle Visuals
Average 2025 continuity (53% back) — qb room anchors it, offense is the stress point.
The portal upgraded the TE room but opened a hole at WR.
The 2026 draft hit DEFENSIVE EDGE hardest — and the portal hasn't replaced it yet.
Oklahoma sits where recruit talent and draft yield largely match.
Featured in The Canon
r/cfb moments
4.8k
[Postgame Thread] TCU Defeats Oklahoma 55-24
All-time top community posts · ranked by upvotes
This page may include content derived from public news sources, social media, and fan communities. We relay these sources as-is — we are not reporting them. Sources may be summarized or quoted imperfectly; for anything that matters, go look at the original source directly. The original source may also be wrong. AI-generated content is labeled and may contain factual errors. All analysis is editorial opinion, not professional reporting. Data sources · About this site