CFB Zeitgeist Score
50
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by pass tds at the 72nd percentile.
Drake Lindsey
Drake Lindsey steps into Max Brosmer's shoes — the gap is the story.
PERCEPTION ABOVE TAPE · PCTL GAP
-38
perception vs production percentile · 2025
The name carries 72nd-percentile weight; the snaps grade out 34th. The gap is the open question.
AI narrative · updated 2026-06-22 · compiled from CFB Zeitgeist data
2026 Outlook
Returning to Minnesota for 2026
2026 Depth chart
Projected starter
Quarterback · Minnesota
Returning around him
2026 Award watch
No preseason watch lists yet (most drop June 15 – July 15)
Minnesota · Last season: 8-5 · Talent rank #41 · 2026 recruiting class #49
QB · MINNESOTA · BIG TEN
CFB Zeitgeist Score
50
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by pass tds at the 72nd percentile.
Heisman Heat
#577
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
“Gophers quarterback Drake Lindsey apologizes for offseason arrest: “I’ve certainly grown a lot from them and learned a lot.””
Development Trajectory · passing yards
2024–2025Up 4664% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-star | 0.8717 | No. 873 recruit | HighSchool |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| No transfer portal moves on file for this player. | ||
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
Selector recognition fills in once the major honors lists (AP, FWAA, AFCA, Walter Camp, Sporting News, SI) are scraped and ingested.
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★☆☆
to —
Composite
0.8717
#873 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment · Season 2025 conversation window
Belief Meter
54
Reading The Room
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
Only 1 rival mention(s) — below the 4-mention floor for a defensible read.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
3.0
ratio
P4 + Notre Dame QBs, min 150 attempts
Why it matters
#22 of 72 P4 + Notre Dame QBs at 3.0 TDs per INT (389 attempts).
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=389 cohort 72
Signature Moment
No signature moment on the ledger yet.
Returns once this player puts together a multi-game body of work — single-game flashes alone don't clear the bar.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
Drake Lindsey's story is about how role and output meet each other. For Minnesota, the card already shows enough current-season production to explain why he is on the serious-player board, and the next layer is determining whether the profile is just very good or actually distinctive.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
High-volume passer | Pocket-leaning against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 13 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 23-10vs Buffalo | 19/35 | 290 | 2 | 1 | 8.3 | 44.3 | |
| Wk 2 | W 66-0vs Northwestern State | 8/9 | 139 | 1 | 0 | 15.4 | 96.1 | |
| Wk 3 | L 14-27@ California | 19/32 | 205 | 1 | 1 | 6.4 | 65.3 | |
| Wk 5 | W 31-28vs Rutgers | 31/41 | 324 | 3 | 0 | 7.9 | 75.9 | Season-high 324 yds |
| Wk 6 | L 3-42@ Ohio State | 15/26 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 3.6 | 70.1 | |
| Wk 7 | W 27-20vs Purdue | 21/45 | 232 | 2 | 1 | 5.2 | 34.5 | |
| Wk 8 | W 24-6vs Nebraska | 16/20 | 153 | 1 | 0 | 7.7 | 93.8 | |
| Wk 9 | L 3-41@ Iowa | 16/28 | 109 | 0 | 3 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 3 INTs — rough day |
| Wk 10 | W 23-20vs Michigan State | 26/39 | 197 | 0 | 0 | 5.1 | 57.4 | |
| Wk 12 | L 13-42@ Oregon | 19/32 | 138 | 1 | 0 | 4.3 | 64.3 | |
| Wk 13 | L 35-38@ Northwestern | 20/30 | 264 | 4 | 0 | 8.8 | 86.0 | 4 TD passes |
| Wk 14 | W 17-7vs Wisconsin | 18/24 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 3.8 | 59.4 | |
| Bowl | W 20-17vs New Mexico | 18/28 | 147 | 2 | 0 | 5.3 | 54.7 | |
| Total | 246/389 | 2382 | 18 | 6 | 6.6 | 62.0 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 2,382 | #71/382 | 82nd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 18 | #49/407 | 88th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 246 | #40/383 | 90th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 63.2% | #162/383 | 58th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 6.1 | #254/382 | 34th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | -119 | #406/408 | 1st pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.24 | #118/200 | 42nd pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 376 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 53.3% | #52/428 | 88th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 389 | #34/407 | 92nd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 6 | #294/407 | 28th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 34 | #162/408 | 61st pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 4 | #74/408 | 82nd pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 3 | #376/391 | 4th pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | -3.5 | #393/407 | 4th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 95.6% | #18/428 | 96th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 66.5% | #65/428 | 85th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 65.2% | #66/428 | 85th pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 51.9% | #22/428 | 95th pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 49.3% | #88/428 | 80th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 47.0% | #52/428 | 88th pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 3.7% | #310/428 | 28th pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 0 | #1/258 | 100th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION
AWAITING CLASSIFICATION · Rung None of 16
Why he’s here
Standing classification populates when honors, Heisman, and roster signals all align.
What moves him up
What moves him down
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 13 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home8g | 196 | 1.5 | 7.3 | 0.2 |
| Road5g | 162 | 1.2 | 5.4 | 0.8 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins8g | 196 | 1.5 | 7.3 | 0.2 |
| Losses5g | 162 | 1.2 | 5.4 | 0.8 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-77g | 204 | 1.6 | 7.4 | 0.4 |
| Weeks 8+6g | 158 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 0.5 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: fumbles lost (91st). Concern: rush yards (1st).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Pass Profile · Completion depth (PBP)
Where the throws are landing
Short
0–9 ydsMiddle
10–19 ydsDeep
20+ ydsOverall 59.7% completion on 206 attempts · 17 deep completions averaging 32.4 yds.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2024
Concerns: EPA / dropback.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
Balanced passer who operates within the system. Profile sits near league average across dimensions.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Tanner McKee’s 2022 season.
Tanner McKee
Jack Plummer
Maalik Murphy
Hayden Wolff
Hayden Wolff
Matches Tanner on
Differs from Tanner on
Through 1 college season, his career arc tracks closest to Parker McKinney’s path through Eastern Kentucky.
Parker McKinney
Derek Robertson
Evan Bullock
Matthew Caldwell
Jalon Jones
Matches Parker on
As a sophomore, his production profile tracks closest to Maalik Murphy's sophomore season at Duke (2024).
Maalik Murphy
Jacob Sirmon
Tanner McKee
Jalen Kitna
Hayden Wolff
Differs from Maalik on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
P.J. Fleck
Pass share
51.7%
397 pass / 371 run
Plays / game
59.1
13 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
7.3%
302 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced, slow tempo.
Coaching Lineage · 2024–2025
1 coachPlayed his entire career under P.J. Fleck.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
All-America, all-conference, player-of-the-week, watch-list, and postseason awards land here when they're earned. The absence is the signal: most players never collect formal honors, and that's its own kind of context.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No formal honors on the ledger yet. All-America, all-conference, weekly awards, watch lists, and postseason trophies land here when they’re earned. | ||||
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
| Season | Team | Role | Latest Model | Forecast | Win | Finalist | Official Finish | Points | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Minnesota | QB1 | #577 | #648 | 0.0% | 0.0% | -- | -- | W16 snapshot | Big Ten |
Team, conference, and class by season.