CFB Zeitgeist Score
51
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by completion % at the 83rd percentile.
Dylan Lonergan
Below the discourse floor — the honest stats-only state.
2,025 PASS YDS · 12 PASS TD · -37 RUSH YDS
Where He Ended Up · Transfer
Transferred to Rutgers
QB · BOSTON COLLEGE · ACC
CFB Zeitgeist Score
51
Mid-pack in the position cohort. Carried by completion % at the 83rd percentile.
Heisman Heat
#205
<1% win probability
Fan Belief
Awaiting
Player-specific FI not yet ingested. Falls back to team mood below.
Respect Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
Reality Gap
Awaiting
Coming online with player-level FI.
ACCOLADE PROBABILITY
Heisman
<1%
TOP QB AWARD
Davey O'Brien
—
CONSENSUS
All-American
—
Player Standing · 17 rungs
Tier 2 · StarterImpact starter. Producing measurable value above replacement.
Career arc · Season-by-season Standing
3 seasons on the ladder
2023
Alabama · QB
—
2024
Alabama · QB
—
2025
Boston College · QB
R09 · All-Conference HM / 2nd team
Recognized
Development Trajectory · passing yards
2023–2025Up 16775% from first season to most-recent.
Career Arc
The durable bio layer: position, size, hometown, and roster role.
How big the prospect was before college, and whether the later career arc beat that expectation.
| Class | Profile | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4-star | 0.9359 | No. 154 recruit | HighSchool | Alabama |
Portal movement changes role, context, and perception. This keeps that path in one place.
| Season | Move | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Boston College -> Rutgers | 3-star | 0.8600 | Immediate |
| 2025 | Alabama -> Boston College | 3-star | 0.8700 | Immediate |
Where the player landed at the end of the listed season — final nowcast rank, win/finalist/ballot probabilities, and the cleanest official Heisman placement on file.
HIGH CONFIDENCE· through week 16Heisman Futures
Not yet listed on major futures markets.
Achievements
Selector Grid · 2025
NIL · Recruiting · NFL Draft
Market value, pedigree & pro outcome
Recruit stars
★★★★☆
to Alabama
Composite
0.9359
#154 national
Today’s Hot-Take
The Hot-Take engine fires when this player’s percentile profile crosses a defensible threshold (top 10% in a cohort, 100+ snap sample). When it’s quiet, the model is honoring its “must be defensible” rule.
Anti-Take
PENDINGThe contrarian read fires when the rules-engine detects a stat that complicates the Hot-Take. Quiet here means the model hasn’t found a defensible counter yet — not that one doesn’t exist.
Fan sentiment ·
Belief Meter
—
Awaiting per-cohort signal
Top Take
“”
Trajectory
Rival Radar
No rival-bucket mentions in the current season.
2025 Signature · 2025 season
0.7%
pct
P4 + Notre Dame QBs, min 150 attempts
Best by a Boston College QB since Emmett Morehead 2022.
Why it matters
#16 of 72 P4 + Notre Dame QBs at 0.7% completion rate (284 attempts).
Vs cohort
HIGH · n=284 cohort 72
Signature Moment
Week 2 at Michigan State — 390 completion_pct
Result L 40-42
The week the volume broke through — put up 390 yds at Michigan State.
Season Pace · Projection
Where the passing totals stand
To hit 3,000-yard season (currently 2,025): needs 325/game over remaining 3.
To hit 4,000-yard season (currently 2,025): needs 658.3/game over remaining 3.
To hit 25 passing TDs (currently 12): needs 4.3/game over remaining 3.
To hit 30 passing TDs (currently 12): needs 6/game over remaining 3.
To hit 35 passing TDs (currently 12): needs 7.7/game over remaining 3.
The fast read on the thing that makes this player more than a generic stat line.
The useful clue on this card is not just the Heisman rank, but the broader honors spine. Dylan Lonergan already has 1 loaded recognition item, which helps distinguish a player who is merely productive from one who is already earning selector-level validation.
Traditional stats first. Advanced context underneath.
Last season
2025 season snapshot | final
30-second read
Steady volume | Efficient | Pocket-leaning against FBS QB peers. The quickest read is whether the profile wins on volume, efficiency, explosiveness, or rushing value.
2025 season snapshot | final
Passing Efficiency
Passing Production
Rushing
Game Log · Week-by-week
2025 season · 10 games
| Wk | Opp | CMP/ATT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA | QBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | W 66-10vs Fordham | 26/34 | 268 | 4 | 0 | 7.9 | 55.3 | 4 TD passes |
| Wk 2 | L 40-42@ Michigan State | 34/45 | 390 | 4 | 0 | 8.7 | 88.9 | Season-high 390 yds |
| Wk 3 | L 20-30@ Stanford | 30/44 | 333 | 1 | 1 | 7.6 | 51.4 | |
| Wk 5 | L 24-28vs California | 21/37 | 197 | 0 | 2 | 5.3 | 34.5 | |
| Wk 6 | L 7-48@ Pittsburgh | 9/18 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 4.9 | 21.6 | |
| Wk 7 | L 10-41vs Clemson | 12/19 | 117 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 | 61.1 | |
| Wk 10 | L 10-25vs Notre Dame | 5/8 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 3.6 | 32.1 | |
| Wk 11 | L 13-45vs SMU | 25/37 | 232 | 1 | 1 | 6.3 | 42.6 | |
| Wk 12 | L 34-36vs Georgia Tech | 26/40 | 362 | 2 | 0 | 9.1 | 77.4 | Clean 2-TD game |
| Wk 14 | W 34-12@ Syracuse | 2/2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 77.9 | |
| Total | 190/284 | 2025 | 12 | 5 | 6.4 | 54.3 |
Traditional history
Season rows up top, career context at the bottom.
Season context · Team result + system
| Season | Team | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Boston College | 190 | 284 | 66.9% | 2,025 | 7.1 | 12 | 5 | 137.2 | -- | -- |
| 2024 | Alabama | 5 | 6 | 83.3% | 23 | 3.8 | 0 | 0 | 115.5 | -- | -- |
| 2023 | Alabama | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 150.4 | -- | -- |
| Career | 3 loaded seasons | 197 | 292 | 67.5% | 2,060 | 7.1 | 12 | 5 | 136.9 | -- | -- |
| Season | Team | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Boston College | 36 | -37 | -1.0 | 1 | -- |
| 2024 | Alabama | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 | -- |
| 2023 | Alabama | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | -- |
| Career | 3 loaded seasons | 38 | -16 | -0.4 | 1 | -- |
Advanced metrics second
Usage, value, and opponent-adjusted context.
Opponent-adjusted passing value. Positive numbers mean the quarterback is adding more value through the air than a neutral peer would in the same environment.
How much of the offense runs through the quarterback once passing and rushing responsibility are blended together.
Every percentile is compared against players at the same position and level, so an FBS quarterback is judged against FBS quarterbacks, not the whole sport.
The top tables stick to the stats fans already know from broadcasts and box scores. Advanced context is pushed underneath instead of replacing the basics.
| Group | Metric | Value | Rank | Pct | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | Passing yards | 2,025 | #90/382 | 77th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Pass TD | 12 | #88/407 | 79th pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completions | 190 | #80/383 | 79th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Completion % | 66.9% | #95/383 | 75th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Passing | Yards / attempt | 7.1 | #165/382 | 57th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing yards | -37 | #391/408 | 4th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Value | Passing WEPA | +0.23 | #127/200 | 37th pct | Opponent-adjusted passing value | 248 weighted playsvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Role share | 43.9% | #129/428 | 70th pct | Share of team offensevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Attempts | 284 | #90/407 | 78th pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Passing | Interceptions | 5 | #276/407 | 32nd pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Carries | 36 | #158/408 | 62nd pct | Volumevs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rushing LONG | 16 | #207/391 | 47th pct | Metricvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Rush TD | 1 | #151/408 | 63rd pct | Scoringvs FBS QB |
| Rushing | Yards / carry | -1.0 | #358/407 | 12th pct | Efficiencyvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Pass share | 69.4% | #142/428 | 67th pct | Air-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Passing-down usage | 58.3% | #114/428 | 74th pct | Known-passing sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | 3rd-down usage | 55.6% | #127/428 | 71st pct | Money-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 2nd-down usage | 45.5% | #114/428 | 74th pct | Middle-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | 1st-down usage | 37.9% | #119/428 | 72nd pct | Early-down loadvs FBS QB |
| Usage | Standard-down usage | 37.8% | #123/428 | 71st pct | Base-situation sharevs FBS QB |
| Usage | Rush share | 7.6% | #207/428 | 52nd pct | Ground-game usagevs FBS QB |
| Ball Security | Fumbles lost | 3 | #213/258 | 18th pct | Turnoversvs FBS QB |
Universal 17-step ladder. Tier pills below; accolade streams nested.
ALL-CONF HM
ALL-CONF HM · Rung 9 of 16
Why he’s here
All-Conference honorable mention / 2nd team — the recognition has started.
What moves him up
A best-at-position run lifts to 1st team.
What moves him down
A back-end conference finish drops out of the honor list.
Accolade streams
Heisman model tracks the top FBS contenders weekly; this player hasn't entered the watch list yet.
Splits · Per-game
2025 season · 10 games
Home vs Road
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home6g | 201 | 1.2 | 6.4 | 0.7 |
| Road4g | 205 | 1.2 | 6.3 | 0.2 |
Win vs Loss
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wins2g | 138 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 |
| Losses8g | 219 | 1.0 | 6.5 | 0.6 |
First half vs Second half
| YDS/g | TD/g | YPA | INT/g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-76g | 232 | 1.5 | 6.8 | 0.5 |
| Weeks 8+4g | 158 | 0.8 | 5.8 | 0.5 |
Pocket and defense-quality (clean vs. pressure) splits are coming soon.
Savant · Box-rate percentiles
Where this profile ranks vs the QB cohort
Elite: completion % (83rd). Concern: rush yards (9th).
Percentiles versus same-position peers with enough snaps this season, based on box-score rates.
Pass Profile · Completion depth (PBP)
Where the throws are landing
Short
0–9 ydsMiddle
10–19 ydsDeep
20+ ydsOverall 64.2% completion on 176 attempts · 16 deep completions averaging 29.2 yds.
Advanced Savant · QB · 2024
Concerns: EPA / dropback.
Opponent-adjusted advanced metrics with a cohort filter.
Peer Comparator · Fingerprint match
Three closest profiles by box-rate percentile
Closest peers by overall box-score percentile profile at the same position.
Player DNA
High-percentage passer who protects the ball. Loses the matchup on improvisation.
His 2025 production profile sits closest to Miller Moss’s 2024 season.
Miller Moss
Kedon Slovis
Garrett Nussmeier
Miller Moss
Jarret Doege
Matches Miller on
Differs from Miller on
Through 1 college season, his career arc tracks closest to Henry Colombi’s path through Marshall.
Henry Colombi
Jarret Doege
Tommy DeVito
Zac Thomas
Miller Moss
Matches Henry on
As a junior, his production profile tracks closest to Conner Harrell's junior season at Charlotte (2025).
Conner Harrell
Jack Layne
Tommy DeVito
Payton Thorne
Emory Jones
Matches Conner on
Differs from Conner on
Supporting Cast · Scheme
Staff and system around the player
Head Coach
Bill O'Brien
Pass share
54.8%
454 pass / 374 run
Plays / game
69.0
12 games
OL sack rate (allowed)
10.9%
349 dropbacks · PBP
Scheme: Balanced.
Coaching Lineage · 2023–2025
2 coachesCoaching transition mid-career: Jeff Hafley → Bill O'Brien. Worth noting in scheme + development context.
Off-field context — switch tabs to drill into recruit profile, transfer arc, or roster timeline.
No fields populated yet.
No fields populated yet.
Trophy Case · Confirmed honors
What the selectors said
ALL-CONFERENCE
All-Conf mention (2025)
All-ACC
Every honor on the ledger, broken out by stream and selector.
Conference-level recognition helps anchor whether a player is merely statistically loud or actually viewed as elite within his competitive lane.
Season-end distinction and week-by-week recognition on one timeline.
| Season | Honor | Scope | Team / Selector | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All-ACC | all_conference | Boston College | ACC | -- |
Modeled rank and official finish by season.
Team, conference, and class by season.
| Season | Team | Conference | Pos | Class | Bio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Boston College | ACC | QB | 2 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 211 lb | Snellville, GA |
| 2024 | Alabama | SEC | QB | 2 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 211 lb | Snellville, GA |
| 2023 | Alabama | SEC | QB | 2 | No. 9 | 6-2 | 211 lb | Snellville, GA |