DIII CONFERENCE · 2026 SEASON
NESCAC
The weekly grind · 2026
A Different Model
NESCAC schools give no athletic scholarships, offer no postseason play, and still produce some of the most competitive Division III football in the country. The model — need-based aid only, athletics embedded in the liberal arts mission — is deliberately different from the scholarship track, and deliberately kept that way.
Conference standings · NESCAC · 2026
Standings
| # | Team | Conf |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trinity (CT) | 7-0 |
| 2 | Amherst | 7-0 |
| 3 | Wesleyan (CT) | 6-1 |
| 4 | Williams | 5-2 |
| 5 | Tufts | 4-3 |
| 6 | Middlebury | 3-4 |
| 7 | Hamilton | 2-5 |
| 8 | Colby | 1-6 |
| 9 | Bowdoin | 0-7 |
| 10 | Bates | 0-7 |
Conference record determines standing. Power = neutral-field pts vs. all-level average. Last 5 = most recent game results.
Projected standings · NESCAC · 2026
Win projection
Odds of winning at least N conference games from current power ratings — full slate played out, not locked to results. Avg = expected wins; W-L = most-likely record.
| # | Team | W-L | Pwr | Avg | ≥9 | ≥8 | ≥7 | ≥6 | ≥5 | ≥4 | ≥3 | ≥2 | ≥1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favorites | |||||||||||||
| 1 | Trinity (CT) | 5-4 | +2.1 | 5.1 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 39 | 65 | 85 | 96 | 99 | ✓ |
| 2 | Wesleyan (CT) | 5-4 | +1.7 | 4.8 | 3 | 13 | 33 | 59 | 82 | 94 | 99 | ✓ | |
| Challengers | |||||||||||||
| 3 | Middlebury | 5-4 | +0.7 | 4.7 | 3 | 11 | 30 | 56 | 79 | 93 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 4 | Williams | 5-4 | +0.4 | 4.7 | 2 | 10 | 29 | 54 | 78 | 93 | 99 | ✓ | |
| 5 | Amherst | 5-4 | +0.4 | 4.6 | 2 | 11 | 29 | 54 | 78 | 93 | 99 | ✓ | |
| The field | |||||||||||||
| 6 | Tufts | 4-5 | −0.5 | 4.5 | 2 | 8 | 24 | 49 | 74 | 91 | 98 | ✓ | |
| 7 | Hamilton | 4-5 | −0.6 | 4.3 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 44 | 70 | 89 | 97 | ✓ | |
| 8 | Colby | 4-5 | −1.1 | 4.2 | 1 | 6 | 19 | 42 | 68 | 88 | 97 | ✓ | |
| Rebuilding | |||||||||||||
| 9 | Bowdoin | 4-5 | −1.5 | 4.1 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 39 | 65 | 86 | 97 | ✓ | |
| 10 | Bates | 4-5 | −1.8 | 4.0 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 37 | 64 | 85 | 96 | ✓ | |
Conference power · Division III
Where we stand
| # | Conference | Avg power |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Southwest | |
| 2 | Wisconsin | |
| 3 | Michigan | |
| 4 | Presidents' | |
| 5 | Southern Athletic | |
| 6 | Old Dominion | |
| 7 | USA South | |
| 8 | Centennial | |
| 9 | CCIW | |
| 10 | Minnesota | |
| 11 | Ohio | |
| 12 | North Coast | |
| 13 | Commonwealth Coast | |
| 14 | American Rivers | |
| 15 | Northwest | |
| 16 | NEWMAC | |
| 17 | New Jersey | |
| 18 | Liberty League | |
| 19 | Empire 8 | |
| 20 | Mid Atlantic | |
| 21 | So. Cal. | |
| 22 | NESCACYou are here | |
| 23 | Landmark Conference | |
| 24 | NACC | |
| 25 | MSCAC | |
| 26 | Heartland | |
| 27 | Midwest | |
| 28 | Southern Collegiate Athletic | |
| 29 | Upper Midwest |
Round-robin power = strength of schedule-adjusted conference average, points vs. all-level average team. Record = NESCAC's record vs. that conference across all games this season.
NESCAC schools give no athletic scholarships, offer no postseason play, and still produce some of the most competitive Division III football in the country. The model — need-based aid only, athletics embedded in the liberal arts mission — is deliberately different from the scholarship track, and deliberately kept that way.
League Drivers
NESCAC Team Board
The league stack, sorted by predictive strength. Power is shown as neutral-field points versus the all-level average team, while resume is shown on a 0-100 season score.
| Rank | Team | Record | Power | Resume | ATS | Wins vs Market | Recent Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #502 | Trinity (CT) | 7-0 | −12.4 | 91 | -- | +0.00 | 4-0 over the last 4 (W6 W7 W8 W9) |
| #515 | Wesleyan (CT) | 6-1 | −12.8 | 80 | -- | +0.00 | 3-1 over the last 4 (W6 W7 L8 W9) |
| #543 | Middlebury | 3-4 | −13.9 | 52 | -- | +0.00 | 1-3 over the last 4 (L6 L7 W8 L9) |
| #549 | Williams | 5-2 | −14.1 | 57 | -- | +0.00 | 3-1 over the last 4 (W6 W7 L8 W9) |
| #551 | Amherst | 7-0 | −14.2 | 89 | -- | +0.00 | 4-0 over the last 4 (W6 W7 W8 W9) |
| #574 | Tufts | 4-3 | −15.0 | 31 | -- | +0.00 | 2-2 over the last 4 (W6 L7 W8 L9) |
| #582 | Hamilton | 2-5 | −15.2 | 21 | -- | +0.00 | 2-2 over the last 4 (L6 W7 W8 L9) |
| #593 | Colby | 1-6 | −15.6 | 5 | -- | +0.00 | 1-3 over the last 4 (L6 L7 L8 W9) |
| #602 | Bowdoin | 0-7 | −16.0 | 7 | -- | +0.00 | 0-4 over the last 4 (L6 L7 L8 L9) |
| #613 | Bates | 0-7 | −16.3 | 3 | -- | +0.00 | 0-4 over the last 4 (L6 L7 L8 L9) |